Hi, I am being pursued for an amount which appears to date back to 2002 as the last point of contact.
It was passed from DCA1 to DCA 2, and in September 2010 I wrote to DCA 2 asking for a copy of the credit agreement using a template (consumer credit Act 1974 s77).
DCA 2 replied within the 12 working days to say they had returned the account to DCA 1 and passed on my request.
21 days after the confirmation from DCA 2, I got a confirmation from DCA 1 to say they would provide the information, and expected to be able to do so within a further 12 days (working days was not mentioned).
After 35 days they wrote and confirmed they had not been able to provide the information "within the relevant time period", but still saying I was "obliged to repay".
292 days later (yes, you read that right!) they finally produced the (photocopied then sent through a fax machine by the looks of it) credit agreement including signature and terms and conditions.
I ignored it as I figured it was all dealt with when they took more than the statutory 12 working days. However, that was 13 months ago, and I am still getting a letter once a month, and now it has been passed to DCA 3!
1. Since I wrote to DCA 2 and they passed the request to DCA 1, am I covered by the 12 working day rule, and what date would it run from?
2. In any case, DCA 1 took almost a year to respond in substance, so should I now write to DCA 1 confirming they did not reply in time? I can see templates for No Response, or Invalid Response, but none of the templates seem to cover a Late Response (especially one after they have already admitted they missed the time limit)? Might they say I am at some sort of fault for taking so long to write back to them after ignoring their subsequent letters?
3. Should I just go straight to the 5 year Statute Barred (Scotland) template? Or am I confusing the matter?
4. Should I have any contact with DCA 3 meanwhile, or just see how DCA 1 responds?
It was passed from DCA1 to DCA 2, and in September 2010 I wrote to DCA 2 asking for a copy of the credit agreement using a template (consumer credit Act 1974 s77).
DCA 2 replied within the 12 working days to say they had returned the account to DCA 1 and passed on my request.
21 days after the confirmation from DCA 2, I got a confirmation from DCA 1 to say they would provide the information, and expected to be able to do so within a further 12 days (working days was not mentioned).
After 35 days they wrote and confirmed they had not been able to provide the information "within the relevant time period", but still saying I was "obliged to repay".
292 days later (yes, you read that right!) they finally produced the (photocopied then sent through a fax machine by the looks of it) credit agreement including signature and terms and conditions.
I ignored it as I figured it was all dealt with when they took more than the statutory 12 working days. However, that was 13 months ago, and I am still getting a letter once a month, and now it has been passed to DCA 3!
1. Since I wrote to DCA 2 and they passed the request to DCA 1, am I covered by the 12 working day rule, and what date would it run from?
2. In any case, DCA 1 took almost a year to respond in substance, so should I now write to DCA 1 confirming they did not reply in time? I can see templates for No Response, or Invalid Response, but none of the templates seem to cover a Late Response (especially one after they have already admitted they missed the time limit)? Might they say I am at some sort of fault for taking so long to write back to them after ignoring their subsequent letters?
3. Should I just go straight to the 5 year Statute Barred (Scotland) template? Or am I confusing the matter?
4. Should I have any contact with DCA 3 meanwhile, or just see how DCA 1 responds?
Comment