Hi All
I think I'm on to something here that may take down a couple of payday loan lenders, but need smarter brains than mine regards the legalities!
Looking at the PDL industry it is frequently the case that most of these lenders operate in the US and then set up UK subsidiaries, or have a forwarding address for correspondence.
What I have noticed is a lot of these UK subsidiaries, according to Companies House, are no longer trading, or have failed to submit accounts.
Now what is interesting is that Section 24 of the CCA1974 states the following:
"A standard licence authorises the licensee to carry on a business under the name or names specified in the licence, but not under any other name".
So lets take the case of Quickquid. Their license authorises them to carry on a business under the following name:
Casheuronet UK LLC
However, according to companies house this company was closed in May 2010,
Section 36 (5) of CCA 1974 then goes on to state the following:
"Where a change in a partnership has the result that the business ceases to be carried on under the name, or any of the names, specified in a standard licence the licence shall cease to have effect"
So have I understood this correctly?
As Casheuronet UK LLC has ceased to be carried on under that name (according to companies house) that their CCL should cease to have any effect?
Is this is the case, then these guys are going to have a real problem!
Any feedback on this welcome, as if I am taken to court by this lot I am wondering if this could be used in a defense!
Best
SnV
I think I'm on to something here that may take down a couple of payday loan lenders, but need smarter brains than mine regards the legalities!
Looking at the PDL industry it is frequently the case that most of these lenders operate in the US and then set up UK subsidiaries, or have a forwarding address for correspondence.
What I have noticed is a lot of these UK subsidiaries, according to Companies House, are no longer trading, or have failed to submit accounts.
Now what is interesting is that Section 24 of the CCA1974 states the following:
"A standard licence authorises the licensee to carry on a business under the name or names specified in the licence, but not under any other name".
So lets take the case of Quickquid. Their license authorises them to carry on a business under the following name:
Casheuronet UK LLC
However, according to companies house this company was closed in May 2010,
Section 36 (5) of CCA 1974 then goes on to state the following:
"Where a change in a partnership has the result that the business ceases to be carried on under the name, or any of the names, specified in a standard licence the licence shall cease to have effect"
So have I understood this correctly?
As Casheuronet UK LLC has ceased to be carried on under that name (according to companies house) that their CCL should cease to have any effect?
Is this is the case, then these guys are going to have a real problem!
Any feedback on this welcome, as if I am taken to court by this lot I am wondering if this could be used in a defense!
Best
SnV
Comment