Hi all,
Another thread already and I've only been on here a week
Can someone have a look at the following I'm about to send Barclays aka Sharkleys
This stems from my comments on the Financial Ombudsman Service - SuperComplaint - Page 2 - allaboutFORUMS
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to you today with regard to two complaints I made back in 2008 & 2010 but before I begin I would like to make you fully aware that I completed a SAR (Subject Access Request) back in January 2012 which took Barclays nearly 6 months to comply with. Legally you are only permitted 40 days. This will be the basis for another compliant to ICO (Information Commissioners Office)
As you are aware I took my complaints to the Financial Ombudsman.
Since I received the final response from FOS I have taken it upon myself to investigate these complaints and given the information that I have come across, it is not surprising that FOS rejected my claim.
I have now completed my own investigation and some surprising information has been brought to light with regard to the communication between Barclays & FOS. This makes for some interesting reading to say the least but comes as no surprise given the bias shown by FOS (Financial Ombudsman) towards financial institutions.
Given the information that I now have in my possession I require you to answer the following questions:
On a separate not it has also been brought to my attention that Barclays was taking Overdraft PPI premiums from our account while we were in CREDIT
Can you please explain as to WHY?
I find Barclay’s unprofessional and lackadaisical approach towards my original complaints & FOS investigation totally beyond belief . It is a further mystery but doesn’t come as a surprise as to how and why FOS allowed Barclays to just fob them off.
What I require now as follows:
Please do not try and tell me that there is a 6 year limit on any claims made as I am fully aware of the “The Limitation Act 1980”
The Limitation Act 1980 is quite clear ( see section 32 ) that in cases of fraud, deliberate concealment or the consequences of a mistake the period of limitation does not begin to run until the Claimant has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. Please also note that I only became aware of the unlawful charges applied to the account upon auditing my statements after your continued telephone harassment and threats of legal action.
I will allow you 28 days to respond to my questions, refund unlawfully taken funds from our account & remove all defaults.
Given all the new information I have in my possession, if you fail to respond within this timeframe further complaints will be made to FOS, ICO and I WILL start legal proceedings against Barclays.
I am also considering reporting you to the SFO (Serious Fraud Office) for further investigation.
Kindest Regards
Scrappy Coco
Another thread already and I've only been on here a week
Can someone have a look at the following I'm about to send Barclays aka Sharkleys
This stems from my comments on the Financial Ombudsman Service - SuperComplaint - Page 2 - allaboutFORUMS
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to you today with regard to two complaints I made back in 2008 & 2010 but before I begin I would like to make you fully aware that I completed a SAR (Subject Access Request) back in January 2012 which took Barclays nearly 6 months to comply with. Legally you are only permitted 40 days. This will be the basis for another compliant to ICO (Information Commissioners Office)
As you are aware I took my complaints to the Financial Ombudsman.
Since I received the final response from FOS I have taken it upon myself to investigate these complaints and given the information that I have come across, it is not surprising that FOS rejected my claim.
I have now completed my own investigation and some surprising information has been brought to light with regard to the communication between Barclays & FOS. This makes for some interesting reading to say the least but comes as no surprise given the bias shown by FOS (Financial Ombudsman) towards financial institutions.
Given the information that I now have in my possession I require you to answer the following questions:
- Why did Barclays fail to answer specific question “Can you clarify what benefits are associated with the additions account and whether the consumers have made us of any of these?” that FOS ask on 3 separate occasion but instead chose to ignore FOS?
- Why did Barclays eventually respond to the above question with the following “"this would mean contacting each provider individually and is too onerous? We can confirm mobile phone cover was never taken out."
- Why did Barclays fail to confirm to FOS that the additions fee had been cancelled back in January 2001 and added back onto our account in March 2003 without our expressed permission?
- Why did Barclays fail to inform FOS that I had requested the “Reserve Fee” be cancelled?
On a separate not it has also been brought to my attention that Barclays was taking Overdraft PPI premiums from our account while we were in CREDIT
Can you please explain as to WHY?
I find Barclay’s unprofessional and lackadaisical approach towards my original complaints & FOS investigation totally beyond belief . It is a further mystery but doesn’t come as a surprise as to how and why FOS allowed Barclays to just fob them off.
What I require now as follows:
- Barclays to refund all Additions & Reserve Fees with compound interest for the period in question as per my original complaint. Please see attached.
- Barclays to remove the Defaults they have placed on our credit files within 28 days.
Please do not try and tell me that there is a 6 year limit on any claims made as I am fully aware of the “The Limitation Act 1980”
The Limitation Act 1980 is quite clear ( see section 32 ) that in cases of fraud, deliberate concealment or the consequences of a mistake the period of limitation does not begin to run until the Claimant has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. Please also note that I only became aware of the unlawful charges applied to the account upon auditing my statements after your continued telephone harassment and threats of legal action.
I will allow you 28 days to respond to my questions, refund unlawfully taken funds from our account & remove all defaults.
Given all the new information I have in my possession, if you fail to respond within this timeframe further complaints will be made to FOS, ICO and I WILL start legal proceedings against Barclays.
I am also considering reporting you to the SFO (Serious Fraud Office) for further investigation.
Kindest Regards
Scrappy Coco
Comment