The FOS staff member looking at my complaint against Barclays sent me a pdf of this letter today, which I have never seen before incidentally, and told me that this was their default notice for my overdrawn account...
Now for starters, that looks to me like a Termination Notice, not a Default Notice (the clue is in the title). I thought a Default Notice was supposed to contain a deadline of the form "If you do not do ABC within two weeks [or other set period of time] from the date of this letter, we will do XYZ." I checked the law on this and found Schedule 2 of The Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1...chedule/2/made Now I am not a lawyer, of course, but there seem to be some quite tight regulations on what constitutes a default notice. And if we go by that, this isn't a valid default notice as far as I can see. Unless of course the fine legal minds on here know different...
Plus I never actually received this notice anyway, due to Barclays playing silly buggers with my address (the main body of my FOS complaint).
The reason I'm raising this is that I'm about to pay off this piddling amount (now that I've been back in work for quite a while - it wasn't a sum I could afford to pay off when I was on JSA) in order to start rebuilding my credit. As things stand, the default will of course stay on the CRAs' files with a "satisfied" marker. But my next port of call is going to be the CRAs to argue that the default is void because a valid Default Notice was never served, following this advice on Experian's own website: http://www.experian.co.uk/consumer/q...kjames282.html
Now for starters, that looks to me like a Termination Notice, not a Default Notice (the clue is in the title). I thought a Default Notice was supposed to contain a deadline of the form "If you do not do ABC within two weeks [or other set period of time] from the date of this letter, we will do XYZ." I checked the law on this and found Schedule 2 of The Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1...chedule/2/made Now I am not a lawyer, of course, but there seem to be some quite tight regulations on what constitutes a default notice. And if we go by that, this isn't a valid default notice as far as I can see. Unless of course the fine legal minds on here know different...
Plus I never actually received this notice anyway, due to Barclays playing silly buggers with my address (the main body of my FOS complaint).
The reason I'm raising this is that I'm about to pay off this piddling amount (now that I've been back in work for quite a while - it wasn't a sum I could afford to pay off when I was on JSA) in order to start rebuilding my credit. As things stand, the default will of course stay on the CRAs' files with a "satisfied" marker. But my next port of call is going to be the CRAs to argue that the default is void because a valid Default Notice was never served, following this advice on Experian's own website: http://www.experian.co.uk/consumer/q...kjames282.html
Comment