Hi
I've been reading quite a lot and have a couple of questions please ...
Firstly, has anybody ever had any success with arguing un-enforceability on the grounds that the Terms and Conditions aren't easily legible? The printed copy provided has typing so small that it has to be read with a magnifying glass whilst wearing glasses and even then some words are unclear!
Secondly, where can I find information about any rules (if there are any) surrounding the selling on of a debt?
Can the OC sell a debt when a payment arrangement's in place and being maintained and when they haven't proved the amount of the debt?
Reason I ask is that I complained about missing information from a SAR to the OC.
They issued a final response dated 18th June 2014 saying they'd sent all they have. (Still not provided any transaction list or statements from Oct 2010 to date)
Next come two letters dated 16th July which are in the same envelope but say they are from two different companies. One says it's from NewDay Ltd and the account has been sold to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on 12/06/14. (The letter heading doesn't look quite right). The second letter in the envelope says it's from Lowell Portfolio I also saying the debt was sold to them on 12/06/14.
I replied saying account in dispute and referred to FOS. My letter seems to have crossed with another this time from "Lowell Financial" chasing up the 16th July letter and pushing to make a payment arrangement. (The existing payment arrangement hasn't been cancelled and the amounts on both letters show that the payment has been received)
Just wondering what to do next as don't want to do anything to "accept" their amount of debt quoted?
I've also read somewhere that when a debt is sold to a third party like a collection agency it's been paid in law so can't actually be pursued unless the terms stated it could be sold on. Is that true?
It's all a bit confusing
I've been reading quite a lot and have a couple of questions please ...
Firstly, has anybody ever had any success with arguing un-enforceability on the grounds that the Terms and Conditions aren't easily legible? The printed copy provided has typing so small that it has to be read with a magnifying glass whilst wearing glasses and even then some words are unclear!
Secondly, where can I find information about any rules (if there are any) surrounding the selling on of a debt?
Can the OC sell a debt when a payment arrangement's in place and being maintained and when they haven't proved the amount of the debt?
Reason I ask is that I complained about missing information from a SAR to the OC.
They issued a final response dated 18th June 2014 saying they'd sent all they have. (Still not provided any transaction list or statements from Oct 2010 to date)
Next come two letters dated 16th July which are in the same envelope but say they are from two different companies. One says it's from NewDay Ltd and the account has been sold to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd on 12/06/14. (The letter heading doesn't look quite right). The second letter in the envelope says it's from Lowell Portfolio I also saying the debt was sold to them on 12/06/14.
I replied saying account in dispute and referred to FOS. My letter seems to have crossed with another this time from "Lowell Financial" chasing up the 16th July letter and pushing to make a payment arrangement. (The existing payment arrangement hasn't been cancelled and the amounts on both letters show that the payment has been received)
Just wondering what to do next as don't want to do anything to "accept" their amount of debt quoted?
I've also read somewhere that when a debt is sold to a third party like a collection agency it's been paid in law so can't actually be pursued unless the terms stated it could be sold on. Is that true?
It's all a bit confusing
Comment