Hi, I hope this is the right place to post this. I would like to hear your opinions on whether this is a justified use of 'arrangement to pay' marker.
I went over my credit agreement by £35ish. They rang and offered to increase my credit card limit temporarily and asked if i would pay twice my usual monthly payments over the next four months - £25 to £50.I thought fine, it will push me to reduce the balance anyway. This lasted for four months in which it reverted back to normal.
Not once did they inform me this would have any adverse effect on my credit and definitely didn't mention an 'arrangement to pay'. I have looked up the arrangement to pay definition on the ICO website. It states:
"An ‘arrangement to pay’
This involves a temporary, short-term (up to six months) arrangement
where the lender agrees to accept reduced payments. "
Now, i didn't ask them to reduce payments and in fact i paid twice as much! I didn't ask them to halt any interest and they came to me to suggest this arrangement and did not inform of any adverse implications it would have on my credit report.
Do you think this is something i could successfully contest and have it removed from my credit report? I appreciate any feedback.
I went over my credit agreement by £35ish. They rang and offered to increase my credit card limit temporarily and asked if i would pay twice my usual monthly payments over the next four months - £25 to £50.I thought fine, it will push me to reduce the balance anyway. This lasted for four months in which it reverted back to normal.
Not once did they inform me this would have any adverse effect on my credit and definitely didn't mention an 'arrangement to pay'. I have looked up the arrangement to pay definition on the ICO website. It states:
"An ‘arrangement to pay’
This involves a temporary, short-term (up to six months) arrangement
where the lender agrees to accept reduced payments. "
Now, i didn't ask them to reduce payments and in fact i paid twice as much! I didn't ask them to halt any interest and they came to me to suggest this arrangement and did not inform of any adverse implications it would have on my credit report.
Do you think this is something i could successfully contest and have it removed from my credit report? I appreciate any feedback.
Comment