Hi,
A Charging Order was set against my home in late 2011 for the sum of approx 3K by HFO Capital for a Credit Card debt of £1600 (for a credit card which was allegedly taken out in 2002 and used up until early 2006).
I honestly knew nothing of the 2011 Charging Order or HFO Capital's debt proceedings for this CC debt until November this year (2013), as a result of receiving a Land Registry document as a result of trying to sell my house. I did not reside at the address where HFO Capital sent letters/charging order documents back in 2011. A paying tenant lived at the property instead and claimed Housing and Council Tax benefit for their tenancy whilst I resided 85 miles away to care for someone as their full-time, daily carer. Because I didn't live at the property, I didn't receive notification of the charging order or any HFO Capital debt documents back in 2011, I was therefore unable to contest the Charging Order or debt and the Charging Order was thus approved and applied.
As soon as I found out about the 2011 Charging Order in November of this year, I immediately contacted HFO Capital's legal representatives Turnbull Rutherford explaining I did not reside at the address they sent documentation to in 2011 and also requested information about the debt and credit agreement under Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Card. Despite sending several request letters over the past 5 weeks, they have yet to produce a reconstituted copy of the credit agreement (or any other document referred to in it). They have also not produced any documentation which proves they purchased the alleged debt from the CCC. Do they need to produce this?
I also requested information under Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act from the credit card company directly.
They replied with a photocopy of a small 1-page signed credit card application leaflet and a 'reconstituted copy' of the CCA. The signed application form is not 100% eligible. However, the CCC said in an accompanying letter they are: "currently unable to provide a copy of the terms of your credit agreement as varied in accordance with section 82(1) of the Act. We accept that we are therefore prevented from enforcing our agreement with you while this state of affairs continues. Notwithstanding that we cannot currently enforce the agreement, our rights continue to exist under the agreement. You should therefore continue to pay the debt that has accrued on your account. We can and will continue to take any action short of enforcement."
If I had known about the Charging Order back in 2011, I would have contested it, asked for all of the CCA documentation and would have asked the court to consider a monthly repayment plan instead. I would never have wanted a Charging Order to be set against my home!
To date, HFO Capital Limited/Turnbull Rutherford have failed to provide any of the CCA documents requested. I have not taken responsibility for the CC debt or made any instalment payments to either HFO Capital or the CC company. To date, I have merely confirmed to both parties that I didn't receive any Charging Order court documents and made a request for information under Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
Is a Charging Order an 'enforced' method of debt recovery? If so, is this debt and Charging Order unenforceable? If the credit card company say they are "prevented from enforcing the agreement" - where do I stand legally with HFO Capital/Turnbull Rutherford in regards to the CC debt and the Charging Order they've secured against my home?
I don't know where I stand or what I can do next. HFO Capital's legal reps Turnbull Rutherford are not being very helpful!! Ideally I'd like to get the Charging Order set aside... Any advice would be greatly appreciated about where I stand legally.
Thank you so much!
A Charging Order was set against my home in late 2011 for the sum of approx 3K by HFO Capital for a Credit Card debt of £1600 (for a credit card which was allegedly taken out in 2002 and used up until early 2006).
I honestly knew nothing of the 2011 Charging Order or HFO Capital's debt proceedings for this CC debt until November this year (2013), as a result of receiving a Land Registry document as a result of trying to sell my house. I did not reside at the address where HFO Capital sent letters/charging order documents back in 2011. A paying tenant lived at the property instead and claimed Housing and Council Tax benefit for their tenancy whilst I resided 85 miles away to care for someone as their full-time, daily carer. Because I didn't live at the property, I didn't receive notification of the charging order or any HFO Capital debt documents back in 2011, I was therefore unable to contest the Charging Order or debt and the Charging Order was thus approved and applied.
As soon as I found out about the 2011 Charging Order in November of this year, I immediately contacted HFO Capital's legal representatives Turnbull Rutherford explaining I did not reside at the address they sent documentation to in 2011 and also requested information about the debt and credit agreement under Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Card. Despite sending several request letters over the past 5 weeks, they have yet to produce a reconstituted copy of the credit agreement (or any other document referred to in it). They have also not produced any documentation which proves they purchased the alleged debt from the CCC. Do they need to produce this?
I also requested information under Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act from the credit card company directly.
They replied with a photocopy of a small 1-page signed credit card application leaflet and a 'reconstituted copy' of the CCA. The signed application form is not 100% eligible. However, the CCC said in an accompanying letter they are: "currently unable to provide a copy of the terms of your credit agreement as varied in accordance with section 82(1) of the Act. We accept that we are therefore prevented from enforcing our agreement with you while this state of affairs continues. Notwithstanding that we cannot currently enforce the agreement, our rights continue to exist under the agreement. You should therefore continue to pay the debt that has accrued on your account. We can and will continue to take any action short of enforcement."
If I had known about the Charging Order back in 2011, I would have contested it, asked for all of the CCA documentation and would have asked the court to consider a monthly repayment plan instead. I would never have wanted a Charging Order to be set against my home!
To date, HFO Capital Limited/Turnbull Rutherford have failed to provide any of the CCA documents requested. I have not taken responsibility for the CC debt or made any instalment payments to either HFO Capital or the CC company. To date, I have merely confirmed to both parties that I didn't receive any Charging Order court documents and made a request for information under Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
Is a Charging Order an 'enforced' method of debt recovery? If so, is this debt and Charging Order unenforceable? If the credit card company say they are "prevented from enforcing the agreement" - where do I stand legally with HFO Capital/Turnbull Rutherford in regards to the CC debt and the Charging Order they've secured against my home?
I don't know where I stand or what I can do next. HFO Capital's legal reps Turnbull Rutherford are not being very helpful!! Ideally I'd like to get the Charging Order set aside... Any advice would be greatly appreciated about where I stand legally.
Thank you so much!
Comment