We all know Banks can not be arsed to manage their defaulted accounts..Keen as they are to suck you in, increase your credit limit, charge you for anything and everything and then come down on you like a ton of bricks soon as you really need them to provide some support....
but what is that says when they decide to 'offload' the nuisance accounts...(and by offload I mean they write them off against the provisions they have already made in their accounts)...often at something like 10p in the £ of the face value...what is it that says they are allowed to prohibit who is allowed to buy the account ?
I mean, surely in a 'free market' where goods are traded without restriction, the purchasers of such accounts should include the individual who's account it is ?
I know all about the rules whereby DCA's have to be licensed, but do the bad accounts always have to be sold only to organisations that have a license to continue to implement the conditions that remain within the contract ? What is it that says these accounts have to continue to be subject to the provisions within the contract ? I mean, DCA's can (and sometimes do) write off accounts...so why can't Joe Bloggs buy his own account , effectively writing it off too ?
Isn't there some EU law somewhere that states this is a restrictive practice ?
I know I'm dreaming, but has anyone actually been into this and have a definitive reason which states there is a law which stops this ?
It's not like the Banks are bothered either way, they'd get their 10% anyway...it's just a profit making business for DCA owners. The daft thing is you can write to your Bank and offer 15% (say), which they turn down, then sell to a DCA for 10%....nuts isn't it ?
Banks don't get commission from the DCA's, but I suppose if they were known to allow debtors to pay off their debts at 10% of the value then many more creditors would default maybe...but would they ? Would they risk a black mark on their credit file for 6 years, and the hassle that brings ? I doubt it..
Don't banks have a duty to their shareholders to maximise profits..? Are they not compromising that duty by not getting the best price they can for bad debts ? In fact not even prepared to enter into negotiations on many occasions...
but what is that says when they decide to 'offload' the nuisance accounts...(and by offload I mean they write them off against the provisions they have already made in their accounts)...often at something like 10p in the £ of the face value...what is it that says they are allowed to prohibit who is allowed to buy the account ?
I mean, surely in a 'free market' where goods are traded without restriction, the purchasers of such accounts should include the individual who's account it is ?
I know all about the rules whereby DCA's have to be licensed, but do the bad accounts always have to be sold only to organisations that have a license to continue to implement the conditions that remain within the contract ? What is it that says these accounts have to continue to be subject to the provisions within the contract ? I mean, DCA's can (and sometimes do) write off accounts...so why can't Joe Bloggs buy his own account , effectively writing it off too ?
Isn't there some EU law somewhere that states this is a restrictive practice ?
I know I'm dreaming, but has anyone actually been into this and have a definitive reason which states there is a law which stops this ?
It's not like the Banks are bothered either way, they'd get their 10% anyway...it's just a profit making business for DCA owners. The daft thing is you can write to your Bank and offer 15% (say), which they turn down, then sell to a DCA for 10%....nuts isn't it ?
Banks don't get commission from the DCA's, but I suppose if they were known to allow debtors to pay off their debts at 10% of the value then many more creditors would default maybe...but would they ? Would they risk a black mark on their credit file for 6 years, and the hassle that brings ? I doubt it..
Don't banks have a duty to their shareholders to maximise profits..? Are they not compromising that duty by not getting the best price they can for bad debts ? In fact not even prepared to enter into negotiations on many occasions...
Comment