I had a credit card and current account with a bank (which I stopped using).
The account had a small overdraft (about £111 but that was offset against a refunded overcharge of about £300 from electricity but bank never acknowledged the refund).
When account closed, they also cancelled the credit card and added the balance to the overdraft making overdraft about £5,000.
I received a summons in 2009 for an overdraft of £5,000. Was a bit shocked at the amount as knew it shouldn't have been that amount (didn't know they had added the credit card to it). Phoned bank and they confirmed the closing balance was about £111 and also got copy statements showing this amount.
I also wrote to bank claiming charges of about £1300. I submitted in my defence that I did not recognise the amount being claimed as correct and also the lower amount confirmed by the bank when I phoned them. Also included about the £1300 claimed refund for charges. Case got stayed mainly because the case about the legality of bank charges was still ongoing.
About a year later got a letter from the claimants asking me to withdraw my defence after the case about charges was finalised. Refused as that wasn't the only part of the defence. Heard nothing more until I received a letter saying that the bank had taken the case back to deal internally.
Have since received letters from other DCA's which I have ignored.
As far as I am aware, the case is still stayed so can someone else now attempt to issue me with another CCJ when the previous one is still stayed?
I've read on this forum about "off setting". Am I correct that a bank can only take funds in an account to offset against another debt i.e. is what they done allowable, increasing an overdraft to £5,000 when the agreed limit was only £500?
I have a feeling that this is going to raise its ugly head again as I've been receiving threatening letters from a DCA.
Thanks
The account had a small overdraft (about £111 but that was offset against a refunded overcharge of about £300 from electricity but bank never acknowledged the refund).
When account closed, they also cancelled the credit card and added the balance to the overdraft making overdraft about £5,000.
I received a summons in 2009 for an overdraft of £5,000. Was a bit shocked at the amount as knew it shouldn't have been that amount (didn't know they had added the credit card to it). Phoned bank and they confirmed the closing balance was about £111 and also got copy statements showing this amount.
I also wrote to bank claiming charges of about £1300. I submitted in my defence that I did not recognise the amount being claimed as correct and also the lower amount confirmed by the bank when I phoned them. Also included about the £1300 claimed refund for charges. Case got stayed mainly because the case about the legality of bank charges was still ongoing.
About a year later got a letter from the claimants asking me to withdraw my defence after the case about charges was finalised. Refused as that wasn't the only part of the defence. Heard nothing more until I received a letter saying that the bank had taken the case back to deal internally.
Have since received letters from other DCA's which I have ignored.
As far as I am aware, the case is still stayed so can someone else now attempt to issue me with another CCJ when the previous one is still stayed?
I've read on this forum about "off setting". Am I correct that a bank can only take funds in an account to offset against another debt i.e. is what they done allowable, increasing an overdraft to £5,000 when the agreed limit was only £500?
I have a feeling that this is going to raise its ugly head again as I've been receiving threatening letters from a DCA.
Thanks
Comment