I received my vehicle tax reminder a couple of weeks ago...£230 for a full year, or £126.50 for 6 months (includes a 10% surcharge)
I am told that because of the cost saving measures introduced by the DVLA I will not be receiving a tax disc (no sweat there).
but.........
The cost saving measures introduced from 1st October 2014 haven't seen a reduction in the 10% surcharge, this only comes in from 1st November 2014 when it drops to 5%.
Now I know it isn't THAT much money, but I'm annoyed, and written to the DVLA to ask why. After a couple of weeks of tooing and flowing they now tell me it's HM Treasury that has decided not to reduce the admin surcharge until 1st November.
So, I'm complaing and refusing to pay the surcharge......though willing to pay the vehicle tax..if they allow me to do that.
The question is though, if they write back to me and so I can not pay the vehicle tax without the surcharge (which I'm disputing) can I legally claim they have refused to allow me to pay ? I know if I don't pay anything I can be fined and prosecuted, deported even maybe....
From 1st November 2014 they are introducing a system whereby you can pay by monthly direct debit, instead of paying 'up front'. Now to me that will cost the DVLA more money due to the fact their cash flow will inevitably be worsened. So included in my arguement is why when the cost saving measures are introduced a month before the direct debit option has the surcharge reduction to 5% not been implemented at the same time, to reflect the cost savings ?
In fact I could (and have) argued that the surcharge from 1st October should be less than 5% because the direct debit option must surely be an additional cost but the DVLA say a 5% surcharge will cover that additional cost.
So, apart from you thinking I've too much time on my hands, or just plain barmy...do you think I have a leg to stand on by offering to pay the basic vehicle tax with out surcharge (that would be £115.00) and expect if they prosecute me I have a leg to stand on ?
I am told that because of the cost saving measures introduced by the DVLA I will not be receiving a tax disc (no sweat there).
but.........
The cost saving measures introduced from 1st October 2014 haven't seen a reduction in the 10% surcharge, this only comes in from 1st November 2014 when it drops to 5%.
Now I know it isn't THAT much money, but I'm annoyed, and written to the DVLA to ask why. After a couple of weeks of tooing and flowing they now tell me it's HM Treasury that has decided not to reduce the admin surcharge until 1st November.
So, I'm complaing and refusing to pay the surcharge......though willing to pay the vehicle tax..if they allow me to do that.
The question is though, if they write back to me and so I can not pay the vehicle tax without the surcharge (which I'm disputing) can I legally claim they have refused to allow me to pay ? I know if I don't pay anything I can be fined and prosecuted, deported even maybe....
From 1st November 2014 they are introducing a system whereby you can pay by monthly direct debit, instead of paying 'up front'. Now to me that will cost the DVLA more money due to the fact their cash flow will inevitably be worsened. So included in my arguement is why when the cost saving measures are introduced a month before the direct debit option has the surcharge reduction to 5% not been implemented at the same time, to reflect the cost savings ?
In fact I could (and have) argued that the surcharge from 1st October should be less than 5% because the direct debit option must surely be an additional cost but the DVLA say a 5% surcharge will cover that additional cost.
So, apart from you thinking I've too much time on my hands, or just plain barmy...do you think I have a leg to stand on by offering to pay the basic vehicle tax with out surcharge (that would be £115.00) and expect if they prosecute me I have a leg to stand on ?
Comment