I have a secured debt and have been paying off arrears each month in an arrangement for the past three years, including a large lump sum. My statements are split in two with a separate "default fee account" My extra payments have not been going into this account and the "payment received" column is empty though I have made over 38 overpayments.
The extra money appears to go straight into the capital repayment.
I have rung the administrators today who have, as is their usual practice, a completely different set of accounts and can't answer my question.
I have a number of complaints bumbling along with the FSO and will refer this to them but I would like some help with the legal side of things. Is there any legal requirement to produce accurate and non-misleading accounts? Clearly there is a moral duty to treat the customer fairly but can anyone point me to a legal requirement to use an extra payment for the purpose it was intended?
Last year although we were in an arrangement we were told that the arrears were not going down and they needed more money. We refused and said we would pay the amount we had been paying. They applied to repossess our house as we had failed to reach agreement with them. It seems now that the reason the arrears were not going down was because they were not crediting our default account and were adding penalty charges although we were keeping to our side of the agreement.
The extra money appears to go straight into the capital repayment.
I have rung the administrators today who have, as is their usual practice, a completely different set of accounts and can't answer my question.
I have a number of complaints bumbling along with the FSO and will refer this to them but I would like some help with the legal side of things. Is there any legal requirement to produce accurate and non-misleading accounts? Clearly there is a moral duty to treat the customer fairly but can anyone point me to a legal requirement to use an extra payment for the purpose it was intended?
Last year although we were in an arrangement we were told that the arrears were not going down and they needed more money. We refused and said we would pay the amount we had been paying. They applied to repossess our house as we had failed to reach agreement with them. It seems now that the reason the arrears were not going down was because they were not crediting our default account and were adding penalty charges although we were keeping to our side of the agreement.
Comment