A Home Move Order for landline, broadband and TV was placed with BT on 30th October 2013 by my partner, let me call her Mrs Desyduk living in Newcastle Upon Tyne, on behalf of her severely dyslexic daughter xxxxxxxx xxxxxx now aged 25 and living in London.
Yes this is the same lovely, thoughtful, kind and independantly minded daughter who had the problem with another Telecoms supplier detailed in the thread “Phones4U/T-Mobile/BCW Hell”.
In late October 2013 our daughter had just moved flat from one North London address to another thus requiring immediate termination of services at the old address, and, as the new address is served by a different telephone exchange, BT confirmed 25th November 2013 as the earliest date to complete the Order.
The order was crystal clear, BT confirmed the order in writing to Mrs Desyduk; two London addresses and two London landline numbers and our Newcastle Upon Tyne home number as the contact point.
What follows is an absolute BT Customer Service Nightmare cutting the legs off Managing Director of BT Customer Service Warren Buckley’s allegation that BT “deliver a seamless multi-channel approach” to Customer Service, http://www.mycustomer.com/topic/warr...service/158207. BT certainly delivered a multi-channel approach in this case but with yawning chasms between the channels.
At the root of this fiasco was BT erroneously terminating our Newcastle Upon Tyne home landline, given to them as the contact number for the London Home Move Order by Mrs Desyduk, as well as our Infinity 2 Broadband services on 1st November 2013.
It took me 6 weeks, 29 telephone conversations with 17 named (first names only) and very nice BT agents in 10 different BT teams in India and around the UK, 9 emails and 1 letter to Warren Buckley, who tellingly did not reply or take action on the matter, to unravel the mess and persuade BT to carry out the simple act of restoring our Newcastle Upon Tyne BT services and to compensate us for the loss of enjoyment, peace of mind about the service and costs incurred.
However professional, pleasant, patient and sympathetic BT’s agents are, and they are, BT’s “multi-channel” processes confounded and prevented their intelligent application of common sense at every twist and turn to reinstate the service.
I call it ‘Warren’s Rabbit Run’ and the following posts in this thread recall the events......
Yes this is the same lovely, thoughtful, kind and independantly minded daughter who had the problem with another Telecoms supplier detailed in the thread “Phones4U/T-Mobile/BCW Hell”.
In late October 2013 our daughter had just moved flat from one North London address to another thus requiring immediate termination of services at the old address, and, as the new address is served by a different telephone exchange, BT confirmed 25th November 2013 as the earliest date to complete the Order.
The order was crystal clear, BT confirmed the order in writing to Mrs Desyduk; two London addresses and two London landline numbers and our Newcastle Upon Tyne home number as the contact point.
What follows is an absolute BT Customer Service Nightmare cutting the legs off Managing Director of BT Customer Service Warren Buckley’s allegation that BT “deliver a seamless multi-channel approach” to Customer Service, http://www.mycustomer.com/topic/warr...service/158207. BT certainly delivered a multi-channel approach in this case but with yawning chasms between the channels.
At the root of this fiasco was BT erroneously terminating our Newcastle Upon Tyne home landline, given to them as the contact number for the London Home Move Order by Mrs Desyduk, as well as our Infinity 2 Broadband services on 1st November 2013.
It took me 6 weeks, 29 telephone conversations with 17 named (first names only) and very nice BT agents in 10 different BT teams in India and around the UK, 9 emails and 1 letter to Warren Buckley, who tellingly did not reply or take action on the matter, to unravel the mess and persuade BT to carry out the simple act of restoring our Newcastle Upon Tyne BT services and to compensate us for the loss of enjoyment, peace of mind about the service and costs incurred.
However professional, pleasant, patient and sympathetic BT’s agents are, and they are, BT’s “multi-channel” processes confounded and prevented their intelligent application of common sense at every twist and turn to reinstate the service.
I call it ‘Warren’s Rabbit Run’ and the following posts in this thread recall the events......
Comment