Re: Flossy UE Diary & YB Hassle
Who has being tying Niddy up? I thought this was a respectable forum
Who has being tying Niddy up? I thought this was a respectable forum
We're a FREE consumer debt and legal forum offering help, support and debate in many areas of day-to-day life. You will need to Register a Free Account before you can join in with the discussion and contribute with your own posts. Remember to also check out the FAQ's so you can get to grips with how the forum works ready to start posting your new topics. Read about the new GDPR 2018 Rules and how it affects you as a member of AAD.

It looks very nice and tidy. 
- Blag this, why not? Obviously don't pay and respond with this - see what happens, keep us updated --> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | CCA Query - Missing Prescribed Terms
- Blag this, why not? Obviously don't pay and respond with this - see what happens, keep us updated --> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | CCA Query - Missing Prescribed Terms
Have you sent them the harassment letter? If not you should send it ---> Our Templates | Harassment & Intimidation Templates | Harassment & Threat of Doorstep-Visit
is about you can shove it to him.
-
- Niddy - "Respond with this --> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Threat by Creditor - Threat-o-Gram Letter Before Action"
- Niddy "This is weird I don't see how they can send two versions of CCA's and more so why I missed this and said one was UE and one was EN. Yea they can remedy a s.78 but they cannot falsify a document if they have previously stated that X is the actual original. It then puts into doubt their claim that agreement Y was actually correct, based on their previously stating agreement X was an original (if any of that makes sense)... hence I would like to see both copies again please with a brief explanation as to why you got two versions etc - please email me one email with the first agreement and terms etc plus the cover letter and the same in another email for the second version. I'll clarify this later once I see documents again, I think this would be UE regardless so want to check - thanks".

- Niddy "This is weird I don't see how they can send two versions of CCA's and more so why I missed this and said one was UE and one was EN. Yea they can remedy a s.78 but they cannot falsify a document if they have previously stated that X is the actual original. It then puts into doubt their claim that agreement Y was actually correct, based on their previously stating agreement X was an original (if any of that makes sense)... hence I would like to see both copies again please with a brief explanation as to why you got two versions etc - please email me one email with the first agreement and terms etc plus the cover letter and the same in another email for the second version. I'll clarify this later once I see documents again, I think this would be UE regardless so want to check - thanks".Website Built & Managed by SimpleServe Web Design.
Comment