Re: Spud's UE Diary
	
		
			
			
				
	
Paul makes sense of this in his latest blog which should help 
 
 
http://paulatwatsonssolicitors.wordpress.com/
 
Basically a creditor can send you rubbish in response to a s.77-79 request and tell you that they believe they have satisfied your CCA request. Only a court can tell them if they are wrong.
 
If the court decides that they have satisfied your CCA request (sent appropriate documents however illegible or lacking in information) that doesn't stop the court dismissing the claim if the CCA was improperly executed.
 
In my case Santander vs Mayhew I lost the legal argument on s.78 compliance but won the legal argument on s.61 not properly executed. There are loads of reasons why a credit agreement can be UE.
 
I hope this makes sense
							
						
					
					Originally posted by Spud
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		http://paulatwatsonssolicitors.wordpress.com/
Basically a creditor can send you rubbish in response to a s.77-79 request and tell you that they believe they have satisfied your CCA request. Only a court can tell them if they are wrong.
If the court decides that they have satisfied your CCA request (sent appropriate documents however illegible or lacking in information) that doesn't stop the court dismissing the claim if the CCA was improperly executed.
In my case Santander vs Mayhew I lost the legal argument on s.78 compliance but won the legal argument on s.61 not properly executed. There are loads of reasons why a credit agreement can be UE.
I hope this makes sense

)
							
						

Comment