Re: Spud's UE Diary
Paul makes sense of this in his latest blog which should help
http://paulatwatsonssolicitors.wordpress.com/
Basically a creditor can send you rubbish in response to a s.77-79 request and tell you that they believe they have satisfied your CCA request. Only a court can tell them if they are wrong.
If the court decides that they have satisfied your CCA request (sent appropriate documents however illegible or lacking in information) that doesn't stop the court dismissing the claim if the CCA was improperly executed.
In my case Santander vs Mayhew I lost the legal argument on s.78 compliance but won the legal argument on s.61 not properly executed. There are loads of reasons why a credit agreement can be UE.
I hope this makes sense
Originally posted by Spud
View Post
http://paulatwatsonssolicitors.wordpress.com/
Basically a creditor can send you rubbish in response to a s.77-79 request and tell you that they believe they have satisfied your CCA request. Only a court can tell them if they are wrong.
If the court decides that they have satisfied your CCA request (sent appropriate documents however illegible or lacking in information) that doesn't stop the court dismissing the claim if the CCA was improperly executed.
In my case Santander vs Mayhew I lost the legal argument on s.78 compliance but won the legal argument on s.61 not properly executed. There are loads of reasons why a credit agreement can be UE.
I hope this makes sense
Comment