Re: PRA GROUP (UK) LIMITED ( HOWELL JONES LLP ) v Roger - Issued 1 December 2015
It's because it's before 19/05/85. I've explained why HSBC is likely unregulated.
Read s.78 / s.141 etc. There's too many points to list but the key date is 05/1985. Section 78 wasn't valid before then either so you couldn't do a s.78 request now. It's a chargecard so was unregulated.
s.78 was brought into force on 19.5.1985. Schedule 3 states that "s.78 applies to an agreement made before 19.5.1985 where the agreement would have been regulated agreement if made on that day". Under regulation 9 of the copy documents regulations, it specifies that in the case of an agreement made before 19.5.1985 it is sufficient to supply a copy of the current terms which thus acts as a true copy. Obviously only for s.78, not for court (CPR applies).
However let's stick on track. This is not HSBC on this thread is it?
It's because it's before 19/05/85. I've explained why HSBC is likely unregulated.
Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt
View Post
s.78 was brought into force on 19.5.1985. Schedule 3 states that "s.78 applies to an agreement made before 19.5.1985 where the agreement would have been regulated agreement if made on that day". Under regulation 9 of the copy documents regulations, it specifies that in the case of an agreement made before 19.5.1985 it is sufficient to supply a copy of the current terms which thus acts as a true copy. Obviously only for s.78, not for court (CPR applies).
However let's stick on track. This is not HSBC on this thread is it?
Comment