Re: Greymatter's ue Diary
Originally Posted by greymatter
Barclaycard Gold Visa
Type of account (credit card)
Date commenced (Pre 2000)
Approx Balance (£10600)
Last made a FULL payment (June 2003)
Paying by arrangement with DCA(CSL)
Default Notice issued by Mercers acting as agents for BC(Sep 2003)
Account run by CSL
I will be requesting CCA by recorded delivery tomorrow and will update my diary when I receive anything.
Thanks to Niddy and you all.
Key:sent
received
other information
16.12.11 Recorded delivery sent today
19.12.11 Signature obtained
10.01.12 No response to my CCA request.Am I too early to send :CCA request Final Demand.Or should I ignore and stop payment now.
10.01.12 Payment stopped
12.01.12 Letter received(In fact 2 identical) from CSL, they are referring back to client for copy docs.
26.01.2012 Received a letter direct from BC stating that they no longer hold a copy of my executable agreement.They go on further to state that they accept that they are therefore prevented from enforcing the agreement.
This therefore makes it in their own wordsThanks AAD
21.03.2012 Hi Niddy I received the following 2 letters :
19.03.2012 Barclaycard(Posted from Stockport 2nd Class)informing me that the account has been passed to Moorcroft who are now handling the account and I should correspond with them
19.03.2012 Letter (!st class fro Stockport)Moorcroft threatening me with intended litigation(in bold letters!)
Please advise best course of action for me to take here.
Thanks
GM
21.03.2012 I2D^^^^^CCA Query - Letter Previously Confirming No CCA-----<send this with a copy of the letter you have......
21.03.2012 . Letter and attachments sent recorded today.
Thanks I2D
29.03.2012Letter received today from Moorcroft obviously ignoring ny letter with the enclosure.
This letter came in a yellow envelope(Piss coloured)with bold ref:IMPORTANT INFORMATION-POSSIBLE LITTIGATION.It shows a grid with costs if they were successful in entering a judgement.
What would be the response here please Niddy/I2D?
Thanks
GM
29.03.2012 Niddy says: send this:---> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Threat by Creditor - Threat-o-Gram Letter Before Action
Thanks Niddy
29.03.2012 Letter: Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Threat by Creditor - Threat-o-Gram Letter Before Action
going to get recorded del now.
Hi Niddy/I2D
06/07/2012 Received the repeat possible litigation from Moorcroft this is after they said its on hold whilst investigating.
Should I resend Threat by Creditor - Threat-o-Gram Letter Before Action , or ignore ?
Thanks
GM
6/07/2012 I2D .I Would re send this if it were me-----> CCA Query - Letter Previously Confirming No CCA
6/07/2012 Recorded and sent.
8/07/2012 They have received and signed
12/07/2012 Hi Niddy/I2D
12/07/2012 Received letter from Moorcroft,obviously ignoring my 2nd letter attaching BC cannot enforce letter.They are quoting CCA 78a re: true copy of their credit agreement on request.need not be an exact copy or photocopy etc etc.It goes on to remind me of Carey vs HSBC Bank the Judge agreeing that this is the correct interpretation.
They are therefore looking forward to my proposals within the next 14 days to discharge my liability.
They are clearly ignoring the BC letter 'currently unable to provide a copy of the t/c's...and therefore prevented from enforcing.........' this was back in Jan this year.
Plus they have also ignored the fact that they(BC)never sent any Tc's(didn't have any) and yet their opening para states that the docs sent by their client meets the requirements under Sec 78 CCA.
What response should I use or is it an ignore and wait and see?
Many thanks
GM
12/07/2012PEPE 2008 I would ignore them and save my postage. Had them trying exactly the same with me.
Or send them another copy of the BC letter with just a short note inviting them to, this time, read it and understand it and then come back to you with THEIR proposals.
It may well not be a reply to the letter that you recently sent as there are only 4 days separating this letter from Moroncroft and them having recieved the Recorded letter.
12/07/2012
Hi pepe2008
I think that ignoring them at this stage seems favourite as they clearly have not read what they have sent me and what I responded to(2)!!
I think that they are hoping that my knowledge of UE is about the same as theirs.
This is their reply to my recent letter as they had sent a 2nd 'Possible Litigation'letter last time(2nd time)and this is what I replied to(again).
Interesting to see they tried the same tact with you and no doubt many more besides.
Thanks pepe2008
23/07/2012
Hi Niddy/I2D
23/07/2012 Received letter from Moorcrap Headed in very large caps indeed-MONTHLY INSTALENT OFFER
Letter then goes on to threat -o-gram- style:
''As we have not received any communication from you re your o/s account...... In order to stop our recommending our clients that solicitors commence legal proceedings we are prepared to accept payments of £x per month.
failure to respond may leave us with no option but to recommend to our clients that theyconsider taking legal action against you.bla blah blah.
They have continually ignored my responses,'Account U/E see attached letter'
Whats the best response here as previously I ignored their request for my proposals to clear the account?
Thanks Niddy and I2D
GM Quote:
08/08/2012
Hi Niddy/I2D
Just received a letter from 'midas credit services' part of the Moorcroft Group.
Letter has big bold 'LITIGATION WARNING' It states that they are now reviewing the account prior to any possible legal action by external solicitors etc etc.
To prevent further action.......contact Moorcroft or failure to contact Moorcroft by 13th of this month may mean that a decision to proceed with legal action will be made.
What response should I now send as its clearly Moorcroft and trhey just keep ignoring my response?
Thanks
GM
8/08/2012 In2DeepI would send this now if it were me-----> Threat by Creditor - Enough is Enough Response
8/08/2012 Hi I2D Letter done and now going to record the delivery.
Thanks
GM [QUOTE]
Hi Niddy/I2Deep
11/08/2012 Letter in response from Moorcroft,basically confirming that 'Barclays are unable to comply with my request due to age of account.They mention ICO has confirmed that whereas a Debtor is not obliged to repay the account due to the provisions of the CCA,this does not mean there was no enforceable agreement.We look forward to hearing from me etc etc with my proposal for dishcharging this liability.'
As I have written many times(see above)and finally with 'enough is enough' template do you agree that should I now ignore .?
It will no doubt get moved on.
GM
Originally Posted by greymatter
Barclaycard Gold Visa
Type of account (credit card)
Date commenced (Pre 2000)
Approx Balance (£10600)
Last made a FULL payment (June 2003)
Paying by arrangement with DCA(CSL)
Default Notice issued by Mercers acting as agents for BC(Sep 2003)
Account run by CSL
I will be requesting CCA by recorded delivery tomorrow and will update my diary when I receive anything.
Thanks to Niddy and you all.
Key:sent
received
other information
16.12.11 Recorded delivery sent today
19.12.11 Signature obtained
10.01.12 No response to my CCA request.Am I too early to send :CCA request Final Demand.Or should I ignore and stop payment now.
10.01.12 Payment stopped
12.01.12 Letter received(In fact 2 identical) from CSL, they are referring back to client for copy docs.
26.01.2012 Received a letter direct from BC stating that they no longer hold a copy of my executable agreement.They go on further to state that they accept that they are therefore prevented from enforcing the agreement.
This therefore makes it in their own wordsThanks AAD
21.03.2012 Hi Niddy I received the following 2 letters :
19.03.2012 Barclaycard(Posted from Stockport 2nd Class)informing me that the account has been passed to Moorcroft who are now handling the account and I should correspond with them
19.03.2012 Letter (!st class fro Stockport)Moorcroft threatening me with intended litigation(in bold letters!)
Please advise best course of action for me to take here.
Thanks
GM
21.03.2012 I2D^^^^^CCA Query - Letter Previously Confirming No CCA-----<send this with a copy of the letter you have......
21.03.2012 . Letter and attachments sent recorded today.
Thanks I2D
29.03.2012Letter received today from Moorcroft obviously ignoring ny letter with the enclosure.
This letter came in a yellow envelope(Piss coloured)with bold ref:IMPORTANT INFORMATION-POSSIBLE LITTIGATION.It shows a grid with costs if they were successful in entering a judgement.
What would be the response here please Niddy/I2D?
Thanks
GM
29.03.2012 Niddy says: send this:---> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Threat by Creditor - Threat-o-Gram Letter Before Action
Thanks Niddy
29.03.2012 Letter: Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Threat by Creditor - Threat-o-Gram Letter Before Action
going to get recorded del now.
Hi Niddy/I2D
06/07/2012 Received the repeat possible litigation from Moorcroft this is after they said its on hold whilst investigating.
Should I resend Threat by Creditor - Threat-o-Gram Letter Before Action , or ignore ?
Thanks
GM
6/07/2012 I2D .I Would re send this if it were me-----> CCA Query - Letter Previously Confirming No CCA
6/07/2012 Recorded and sent.
8/07/2012 They have received and signed
12/07/2012 Hi Niddy/I2D
12/07/2012 Received letter from Moorcroft,obviously ignoring my 2nd letter attaching BC cannot enforce letter.They are quoting CCA 78a re: true copy of their credit agreement on request.need not be an exact copy or photocopy etc etc.It goes on to remind me of Carey vs HSBC Bank the Judge agreeing that this is the correct interpretation.
They are therefore looking forward to my proposals within the next 14 days to discharge my liability.
They are clearly ignoring the BC letter 'currently unable to provide a copy of the t/c's...and therefore prevented from enforcing.........' this was back in Jan this year.
Plus they have also ignored the fact that they(BC)never sent any Tc's(didn't have any) and yet their opening para states that the docs sent by their client meets the requirements under Sec 78 CCA.
What response should I use or is it an ignore and wait and see?
Many thanks
GM
12/07/2012PEPE 2008 I would ignore them and save my postage. Had them trying exactly the same with me.
Or send them another copy of the BC letter with just a short note inviting them to, this time, read it and understand it and then come back to you with THEIR proposals.
It may well not be a reply to the letter that you recently sent as there are only 4 days separating this letter from Moroncroft and them having recieved the Recorded letter.
12/07/2012
Hi pepe2008
I think that ignoring them at this stage seems favourite as they clearly have not read what they have sent me and what I responded to(2)!!
I think that they are hoping that my knowledge of UE is about the same as theirs.
This is their reply to my recent letter as they had sent a 2nd 'Possible Litigation'letter last time(2nd time)and this is what I replied to(again).
Interesting to see they tried the same tact with you and no doubt many more besides.
Thanks pepe2008
23/07/2012
Hi Niddy/I2D
23/07/2012 Received letter from Moorcrap Headed in very large caps indeed-MONTHLY INSTALENT OFFER
Letter then goes on to threat -o-gram- style:
''As we have not received any communication from you re your o/s account...... In order to stop our recommending our clients that solicitors commence legal proceedings we are prepared to accept payments of £x per month.
failure to respond may leave us with no option but to recommend to our clients that theyconsider taking legal action against you.bla blah blah.
They have continually ignored my responses,'Account U/E see attached letter'
Whats the best response here as previously I ignored their request for my proposals to clear the account?
Thanks Niddy and I2D
GM Quote:
08/08/2012
Hi Niddy/I2D
Just received a letter from 'midas credit services' part of the Moorcroft Group.
Letter has big bold 'LITIGATION WARNING' It states that they are now reviewing the account prior to any possible legal action by external solicitors etc etc.
To prevent further action.......contact Moorcroft or failure to contact Moorcroft by 13th of this month may mean that a decision to proceed with legal action will be made.
What response should I now send as its clearly Moorcroft and trhey just keep ignoring my response?
Thanks
GM
8/08/2012 In2DeepI would send this now if it were me-----> Threat by Creditor - Enough is Enough Response
8/08/2012 Hi I2D Letter done and now going to record the delivery.
Thanks
GM [QUOTE]
Hi Niddy/I2Deep
11/08/2012 Letter in response from Moorcroft,basically confirming that 'Barclays are unable to comply with my request due to age of account.They mention ICO has confirmed that whereas a Debtor is not obliged to repay the account due to the provisions of the CCA,this does not mean there was no enforceable agreement.We look forward to hearing from me etc etc with my proposal for dishcharging this liability.'
As I have written many times(see above)and finally with 'enough is enough' template do you agree that should I now ignore .?
It will no doubt get moved on.
GM
Comment