You can see it would of paid off £133.86 of the capital instead of £6.79.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Extended Mortgage term and Buildings Insurance Premiums.
Collapse
X
-
Guest repliedSo it never made the 1991 calculation. It also never made the 1992 calculation either, if it had of done here's how it would look :
You can see it would of paid off £133.86 of the capital instead of £6.79.
-
Guest repliedThe problem with the above is that the £127.07 payment on 31st December is stuck in the ether and not accounted for on either 1991 sheet or 1992 sheet.
I'll demonstrate, here is how the account would of looked had the 127.07 got there before the interest posting:
You can see that if it had made it on time there would of been £101.72 paid off the capital. But that didn't happen.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedSorry i'm not good at explaining stuff. I have redone the sheets in a better explanatory fashion i hope. As you look at the columns you will see "payments made" column which is actually the events of the account and you will see "payments due " column which you can largely ignore as i put it there for a comparison to see how the account should go. The beginning and end of year balances are now marked and i think it shows you things more clearly the way i have laid it out. You will see in 1991, instead of repaying any capital at all the account is infact -£25.35 and in 1992 the capital repayment is only £6.79 :
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedThanks for that i've corrected them now , think i was going boggle eyed . Have you spotted the problem yet ? Its a massive problem for me.......
Leave a comment:
-
Hi
You have some incorrect figures there, which are throwing your calculations out.
Last payment due in '92 was 88.20.
MIRAS in '92 was 358.18.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedLooks like the £127.07 payment on the 31st December got stuck in the ether.............
Leave a comment:
-
The interest computations had no effect on the arrears/credit figure. The account went into arrears because of the unpaid December debit of £104.43. Remember your December payment was late, after the annual computation had been done. As to why you didn't pay just £22.64, who knows? You have at times made payments above what was needed, hence the credit balance at the end of '92.
I expect the end of year interest computations would have been done centrally, hence no branch number, from '93 possibly new system, new coding practice. You'll also note that 454 changed to 042 from '93. I do think that you are deflecting yourself unnecessarily with that detail. How do you account for 160 appearing against the 2nd April payment, and 736 against the 1st November one in '92?
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedAnother curious thing here, just noticed. 4th December the account is £81.79 in credit. The Payment is obviously a late November payment. So next payment due is 23rd December and that is £104.43. But if the account is £81.79 in credit the actual amount needed to pay would be £104.43 - £81.79 = £22.64 ? After the interest computations £22.64 shows as a minus balance, i understand that. But When i paid (late) on 31st December, how come i never had to just pay £22.64 ?Originally posted by marylikes View PostStatement from 1991 :
If you look at the column to the left of the payments you will see it is populated with 3 figure numbers. "454" it would appear is my local branch, so you can see just where i have paid in. When you look at the entries for interest and MIRAS allowance you see no branch number. On later statements1993 onwards you get a branch number?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedThis was puzzling me too as i had never been in any financial hardship, and i used to just go in and pay what i had to pay. So if i had to guess i would say there was some confusion with the account being "in credit", then i'd of had a letter to say otherwise and in March you can see i have paid multiple payments totalling £240 with equated roughly to the three months payments at £80 a pop?Originally posted by Still Waving View Post
What has been puzzling me is why there were apparently no payments made in Jan and Feb '93, then several seeming random payments during March.
Leave a comment:
-
OK, I see what you are saying. If they had carried on with the old system you would have had a carried forward CREDIT arrears of £50.85. But they have reset the account from 1 Jan 93, thereby dispensing with any arrears (or in your case, credit) in the final column. They have set the term to finish in 2023 (but why November?). They should have explained to you what they were doing, and there should have been a record of that in your SAR bundle. Which raised the question you asked in post #184.
What has been puzzling me is why there were apparently no payments made in Jan and Feb '93, then several seeming random payments during March.
Further, looking back at the remainder of '93, as posted by you at #115, the arrears column is not populated. It surely should have been as there was an arrear of £5.80 at end of March which was not cleared until your payments of £80.00 and £5.48 on 30 April.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by marylikes View PostStatements :
Here we see at the end of 1992, we have a balance of £13301.72 . There is an over payment in the arrears column of £50.85 .
The next payment due would be 23rd January 1993 and it would be the MAR (Monthly Payment) of £83.06 . Because of the £50.85 over payment the actual figure needed to be correct on 23rd January 1993 would be £32.21 (£83.06 - £50.85 = £32.21) . But thats not going to happen.
If we look at the 1993 statement, what we can see is we are starting with Zero in the arrears column. £83.06 due on 23rd Jan, not paid. £83.06 due on 23rd Feb, not paid. Gives us an arrears of £83.06 x 2 = £166.12 . A £40 payment on 12th March brings the arrears column to life again and we can see an arrears figure of £166.12 - £40 = £126.12 .
So, what happened ? This should make it easy to work out although its been very difficult to understand.....
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedOk, give me a minute and i'll post up and explain..............Originally posted by Still Waving View Post
I can't make out what happened in '93, there seems to be something amiss at the beginning, as I can't make the credit balance brought forward from '92 tally with the early '93 debit and payment figures. There seems to be something missing. It might be helpful if you could post up again all the '93 statements in their correct order in one post?
Leave a comment:
-
I can't make out what happened in '93, there seems to be something amiss at the beginning, as I can't make the credit balance brought forward from '92 tally with the early '93 debit and payment figures. There seems to be something missing. It might be helpful if you could post up again all the '93 statements in their correct order in one post?Originally posted by marylikes View PostHi again. As i've gone through everything i've come across and understood something i hadn't noticed before. The phrase "term extension " or "extended term" seems to be something of a misdirection of fact. My paperwork shows that its nothing of the sort. It shows an "arranged payment schedule" began on 1st January 1993 with a start balance of £13,301.72 for a term of 370 months. I've Googled "arranged payment schedule" and its something you would have to agree and also you would only do if you where in difficulty ? This may explain how they have been able to correct their initial error in rates/payment amount ?
And it dawned on me i do not have copy of the mortgage terms and conditions within my bundle so i will request them separatley. Does anyone have any thoughts as to how you can go into an arranged payment schedule and not know ?
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedAlso as your document makes clear, although the payment on 31st December shows on the sheet for the year, its not the true picture. The true picture is the year end balance is £13,401.87 . As you said previously, unusually it missed the interest posting and was carried over.Originally posted by Still Waving View PostHi
A while back you couldn't understand what had happened to your credit balance of £209.35 in Jan '91. You may have figured it out by now, but I've set out '91 with the monthly debit amounts showing in addition to repayments. You will note that there were a few late payments (ie missed months). The first month with no payment was Feb. So, if you deduct the Feb and March debit amounts from the credit balance, and add back in the payment made on 1st March, you get a credit balance of £82.42. See attached.
Edit: I forgot to add headings, but columns 3 and 4 are payment dates and amounts.
AAD- ML calcs 2.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedThanks so much for doing that. Yes its took me a while and i have struggled to understand but i have it now.Originally posted by Still Waving View PostHi
A while back you couldn't understand what had happened to your credit balance of £209.35 in Jan '91. You may have figured it out by now, but I've set out '91 with the monthly debit amounts showing in addition to repayments. You will note that there were a few late payments (ie missed months). The first month with no payment was Feb. So, if you deduct the Feb and March debit amounts from the credit balance, and add back in the payment made on 1st March, you get a credit balance of £82.42. See attached.
Edit: I forgot to add headings, but columns 3 and 4 are payment dates and amounts.
AAD- ML calcs 2.pdf
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: