GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script bobogosing's UE diary - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

bobogosing's UE diary

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ScabHunter
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    Anyone please?

    Shall I send CCA again?

    Many thanks!!
    Patience, patience! Even I can't type like a whirlwind on amphetamines!

    Be careful with this, as MKDP do head for court far too often.

    I can only state what I would personally do in any given situation, and that may or may not be in line with the official policy of this site. In my opinion. it is probably better to refer them back to the letter you sent on 19th October, rather than just sending the same letter again. Doing that could be construed as ignoring the letter you have just received, and a claimant's solicitor could refer to it as evidence that you were just printing off templates and sending them to be obstructive rather than dealing with actual correspondence.

    I would send something like this -

    "Dear Sir,

    I am in receipt of your letter dated xx November 2014, and note with regret that you have entirely failed to deal with the matters raised in my own letter of 19th October 2014. Please refer to that letter and address the matters raised therein in an appropriate manner.

    Your letter mentions the possibility of litigation, but makes no mention of what you intend to do to comply with the Pre-Action Protocols, which is required in an attempt to avoid unnecessary and expensive legal cases. It is also misleading, in that it mentions possibilities for enforcing a judgment which are dependent upon a defendant defaulting upon a judgment, and not merely receiving one.

    Your letter also mentions the possibility of resolving this matter without the need for litigation, yet it is your own obstructiveness which is preventing this from occurring. You have merely forwarded to me a machine produced template, which does nothing to address any of the issues raised in my own previous correspondence.

    As your letter merely mentions the instructing of a “pre-legal” department, I am not treating it as a formal Letter Before Action. Take note that if you issue a claim on the back of this letter without complying with the Pre-Action Protocols, your conduct will be brought to the court's attention, in addition to the case being vigorously defended.

    Yours Faithfully,"



    SH

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    HI All,

    Received letters from MKDP dated 24/11/14 to both my Barclay accounts.
    Planning to send a copy of CCA Query - Missing Prescribed Terms to both of the accounts that I have already sent on 19/10/13.
    Or should I CCA them again.

    Please advice if I am sending the wrong template.

    Thank you in advance.

    bobo x
    Anyone please?

    Shall I send CCA again?

    Many thanks!!

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    HI All,

    Received letters from MKDP dated 24/11/14 to both my Barclay accounts.
    Planning to send a copy of CCA Query - Missing Prescribed Terms to both of the accounts that I have already sent on 19/10/13.

    Please advice if I am sending the wrong template.

    Thank you in advance.

    bobo x
    I am more worried with the 2nd letter.

    Regarding finding me on the credit agencies for my address....I have been using that address to respond to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    Barclaycard 1 (Mrs bobo's)

    Type of account: Barclaycard
    Date commenced: Before 2004
    Approx balance: £3190
    Date last paid: Nov 2003 then went on DMP with CCCS Dec 2003
    Are you on arrangement or not paying: Was on DMP with CCCS, last paid in Nov 2010
    Status: Default and in arrears
    Account owner: Barclaycard

    http://forums.all-about-debt.co.uk/s...&postcount=314

    8/5/13 Requested CCA again for ignoring creditors letters
    received letter from MKDP dated 20/5/13, advised to file away

    Barclaycard 2 (Mrs bobo's)
    • Type of account: Barclaycard
    • Date commenced: Before 2004
    • Approx balance: £1128
    • Date last paid: Nov 2003 then went on DMP with CCCS Dec 2003
    • Are you on arrangement or not paying: Was on DMP with CCCS, last paid in Nov 2010
    • Status: Default and in arrears
    • Account owner: Barclaycard

    http://forums.all-about-debt.co.uk/s...&postcount=251

    8/5/13 Requested CCA again for ignoring creditor's letters
    received letter from MKDP dated 20/5/13,advised to file away
    bobo x




    HI All,

    Received letters from MKDP dated 24/11/14 to both my Barclay accounts.
    Planning to send a copy of CCA Query - Missing Prescribed Terms to both of the accounts that I have already sent on 19/10/13.
    Or should I CCA them again.

    Please advice if I am sending the wrong template.

    Thank you in advance.

    bobo x
    Attached Files
    Last edited by bobogosing; 28 November 2014, 09:56.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Thank a you all for your advices

    I have typed the one liner letter and sending it today via 1st Recorded Signed For Service

    bobo xx

    Leave a comment:


  • ScabHunter
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    Thank you Grassy_K and Mrs D

    I will take Mrs D's advice as I don't really want to give too much away.

    bobo x
    No need to give anything away. Restons will already be aware of the default of s.77, which is why they are trying to make silly discount offers and con you into giving them your telephone number instead of issuing an LBA and going to court.

    However, they could easily turn nasty if they think you're ignoring them. The paper trail is important, so just refer them to what they already know - the default of s.77.

    SH

    Leave a comment:


  • SaltnVinegar
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    Thank you Grassy_K and Mrs D

    I will take Mrs D's advice as I don't really want to give too much away.

    bobo x
    Yes get that letter sent off today (if you haven't already). Restons do not have a good reputation, and are known for not adhering to the rules, so best to get that paper trail going, and push them onto the back foot early.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Thank you Grassy_K and Mrs D

    I will take Mrs D's advice as I don't really want to give too much away.

    bobo x

    Leave a comment:


  • MrsD
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    I would do a one liner referring them to the CCA that you sent

    head it up COMPLAINT and get it off. Restons are not nice people so don't give them any leeway

    Leave a comment:


  • Grassy_K
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Restons' letter before action is very direct and does not include the word "May". But best to keep well on top of this shower of sharks.

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Very true SH :P

    Ok.....looks like I will need to send a CCA template to Restons.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScabHunter
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Didn't you write to Arrow with a CCA request on 8th May? If so, didn't you put your name at the end of the letter, and address at the top so they knew where to send the papers?

    If the solicitors are writing to you at the correct address, they must already have it.

    I'm not sure there's a lot of mileage in trying to hide an address they're already writing to.

    I've only got limited internet access at the moment, and I'm going offline now. Just don't want you to think I'm ignoring you if I don't reply until tomorrow.

    SH

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Thanks SH!

    Since they are not sure of my whereabouts, as they are asking for confirmation of my name and address,
    can I not leave it and see what happens if this letter is not serious?

    bobo x

    Leave a comment:


  • ScabHunter
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    Hi!

    Received letter from Restons dated 22/8/14 with mandatory form asking for my name and address plus employer details etc etc
    “Mandatory” according to whom?

    Ignore all requests for information which are not required by a court. If a solicitor has actually used the word “mandatory” on a “fishing for information” form, that could be considered a misrepresentation of their legal position and be valid cause for a complaint in the future. I wouldn't push it now, though.

    The letter has plenty of tell-tale signs which tell me it is not serious. Solicitors who are serious about taking legal action do not offer 10% reductions on the balance, they don't include paragraphs designed to trick you into giving them your telephone number, and they don't say that they “may” be instructed. Their attitude may change, but at the moment I don't believe they are serious.

    It appears from the time line as though the account holder is still in default of a valid s.77 CCA request. In the interests of maintaining a paper trail, I would write back to the solicitors informing them of this fact.

    SH

    Leave a comment:


  • bobogosing
    replied
    Re: bobogosing's UE diary

    Originally posted by bobogosing View Post
    EGG LOAN (mrs bobo's)

    Type of account: EGG Loan
    Date commenced: 09/03
    Approx balance: £19,541.94
    Date last paid: September 2010
    Are you on arrangement or not paying: Was on DMP with CCCS and now. not paying
    Status: Default and in arrears
    Account owner: Egg Banking PLC

    http://forums.all-about-debt.co.uk/s...&postcount=229

    8/5/13 Resend CCA request as been ignoring letters
    22/5/13 Received letter from Arrow
    28/5/13 received "address inquiry" letter
    14/6/13 Sent this template as advised by Niddy

    "Dear Sirs,

    Ref: xxxxxxxx

    I write with reference to your letter dated 28th May 2013, the content having been noted.

    Thanks for writing to me, confirming you're not going to write to me. It's fine by me, I am happy for you never to contact me again - after all it's not like you're a nuisance and a drain on society is it?

    Obviously you want paying, I am responding to you but you are playing silly beggars which suits me fine. If you want to discuss this matter like adults then I suggest you use your common sense and update your records or close the account as missing in action.

    Funny that you wrote to me asking me to pay money, yet when I write asking for info you then clam up - so do you want to try and resolve matters or not?

    A copy of my last letter is attached for your action, alternatively I'd like to thank you for agreeing never to contact me again.

    Yours faithfully,"

    15/8/14 Received letter from Arrow dated 7/8/14


    Hi All!

    Received this letter from Arrow.

    Shall I ignore? Seems like they are fishing, and it looks like they not certain where I am resided.


    Thank you in advance for all advise.

    bobo x

    Hi!

    Received letter from Restons dated 22/8/14 with mandatory form asking for my name and address plus employer details etc etc

    Please advice what shall I do.

    But I don't think they know if I have received the letter as in the past Arrow have been asking me to confirm my address and I never got back to them.

    Thank you in advance.

    bobo x
    Attached Files
    Last edited by bobogosing; 30 August 2014, 19:22. Reason: typo

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X