Re: Help Needed. MBNA redress calculations Do you have two spare stamps
Indeed, Ms. McAusland has, completely missed the point!
Furthermore, one wonders which forum she was referring to by her comment:
"I have taken the opportunity to look at your forum..." Which one AAD, CAG, PAG or LB?
Most members on the above forums, may not be aware of the fact, that our submission was addressed to both the FOS Interim Chief Ombudsman; Tony Boorman (now Caroline Wayman) and Martin Wheatley CEO of the FCA. The submission included at least four detailed actual examples of cases lodged with the FOS and a large amount of documents explaining the calculations and why MBNA had incorrectly calculated the PPI credit card redress in these cases. Ms. McAusland made no mention of the above referenced submission or the detailed explanations proving that MBNA had incorrectly calculated the PPI redress, why not!?
One can only presume that Ms McAusland had not even had sight of same or, could not even be bothered to look, when she dictated her hurried mass mailing letter dated 26 September 2014; mailed out on 29.September 2014; the very day that our patience had run out and that we posted up on CAG that we were going to the press.
In short, it would appear that the letter that Ms. McAusland sent out on 29 September 2014 was not dealing with our detailed submission at all. But simply a knee jerk reaction to the long thread over on CAG about MBNA Interpretive Calculations.
Also, Ms. McAusland states:
"We will of course consider every case on its own merits..."
But she has written her (I have missed the point) letter to many MBNA victims who already have cases lodged with the FOS!
Why send the letter to these already enraged MBNA complainants, doesn't make sense?
The FOS and FCA are clearly not fit purpose.
Originally posted by ken100464
View Post
Furthermore, one wonders which forum she was referring to by her comment:
"I have taken the opportunity to look at your forum..." Which one AAD, CAG, PAG or LB?
Most members on the above forums, may not be aware of the fact, that our submission was addressed to both the FOS Interim Chief Ombudsman; Tony Boorman (now Caroline Wayman) and Martin Wheatley CEO of the FCA. The submission included at least four detailed actual examples of cases lodged with the FOS and a large amount of documents explaining the calculations and why MBNA had incorrectly calculated the PPI credit card redress in these cases. Ms. McAusland made no mention of the above referenced submission or the detailed explanations proving that MBNA had incorrectly calculated the PPI redress, why not!?
One can only presume that Ms McAusland had not even had sight of same or, could not even be bothered to look, when she dictated her hurried mass mailing letter dated 26 September 2014; mailed out on 29.September 2014; the very day that our patience had run out and that we posted up on CAG that we were going to the press.
In short, it would appear that the letter that Ms. McAusland sent out on 29 September 2014 was not dealing with our detailed submission at all. But simply a knee jerk reaction to the long thread over on CAG about MBNA Interpretive Calculations.
Also, Ms. McAusland states:
"We will of course consider every case on its own merits..."
But she has written her (I have missed the point) letter to many MBNA victims who already have cases lodged with the FOS!
Why send the letter to these already enraged MBNA complainants, doesn't make sense?
The FOS and FCA are clearly not fit purpose.
Comment