commons debate on phone hacking

[PlanB]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

Well the next time any of us gets stopped and searched by the police try telling them you won't give them your mobile number in case they sell it to a tabloid paper. Maybe not or you'll kiss goodbye to that harmless caution . . . And I don't think H.M. Prison Service has plans to hire Jamie Oliver to give them a make-over just yet. So maybe scrub that piece of advice and just say "Yes officer" and then give them the number of Wescot, Capquest, Moorcroft, Cabot or Robinson Way :-)

[garlok]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

now that is a real thought for the day PlanB l

regards
Garlok

[PlanB]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

now that is a real thought for the day PlanB l

regards
Garlok

You've just given me an idea. Whenever you fill in an application form for a credit card, bank account or utility supplier put a DCA's phone number on the form instead of yours. That way if ever you default (it happens) that company's DCA will start harassing and bullying another DCA for payment by phone. Brilliant.

[5corpio]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

i don't know if its still true or still current. (A bit off tangent from phone hack)

If you get caught/stopped by a bobby, and is sitting in the back, once they ask you a question example: Can you tell me what speed you were doing? Never Answer them, just say either Not too sure Officer or 69/70 mph (If on motorway), as everything is recorded in the police car, thats why they never tell you how fast you were going at the begining, as they want to catch you out, If you said 71mph (they've caught you, as you've broken the Law)......End

[garlok]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

Seems Conman himself reads AAD! The ginger slapper has been removed from the inquiry/investigation (to oversee shredding the evidence?) and the public inquiry will now be held under the supervision of a judge and all evidence given under oath (oh F**K I've got to tell another lie type of oath?).

Meanwhile in the Land of the Brothers Grimm, the Metropolitan Police will cooking up a special meal of "Reasonable Doubt" so the Chipping Norton Set can carry on riding together. By the way Elizabeth Murdoch (guess whose daughter) is another one of the Chipping,jolly hockey sticks Norton Set as well.

The smell on a hot day at Plymouth Fish Market is better.

regards
Garlok

[pompeyfaith]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

5Corpio, Garlok,

My incident with the Hampshire bill is as follows:

I was on my way back from Devizes due to taking my dog there to see an orthopedic vet as she had an operation on her front leg and was thus still under the anesthetic and confused.

She could not settle in the car coming home and was thus getting up and laying back down again this was understandable because as I the poor girl was recovering from the anesthetic.

Now because of this I was in no rush to get home and thus stayed in the near side lane doing 50 mph throughout on the M27 because my only concern at that point in time was getting my dog home safely.

Now just entering the M27 from the M3 my son who was in the back of the car caring for our Dog said he needed the toilet so I decided to come of the motorway at the next junction which is for southampton airport and continued to southampton airport so he could use there toilets.

We then continued on our journey home, however on Wide Lane (fuck knows why they call it that) it is a single lane and goes into two at the bottom at the exit anyway some nutter in a BMW chose to overtake on the single lane in rush hour, gets busy due to all the employees from ford transit going home.

Anyway my son was not impressed with his driving style so stuck his finger up at him and called him a lol this is wrong I know so had my own words with my son.

Now that should have been the end of the matter and did not need police intervention, however there was a police car behind us so being as he was not motorway cops and did not have the power to stop on a motorway radio through to the traffic cops to stop us on the motorway.

These followed us on the motorway for a considerable distance and at a considerable distance and made no attempt to indicate that we had to stop so I carried on in the nearside lane doing 50 mph this continued for 4 junctions when I said to my son look if he is still behind at the next junction I will come off and if he follows I will stop.

So we where approaching the fareham/gosport junction and with that there were now 4 cop cars and a van behind us this time really close and they forced me onto hard shoulder.

I had nothing at all to hide so asked them what the problem was with that they heavily pulled me out of car slammed me on the bonnet of cop car, cuffed me and arrested me for failing to stop lol

That was the charge failing to stop, however if they made very clear to me that it was I they wanted to stop like driving closer putting there indicator on and flashing there headlights that I would have done.

They impounded my car and took me too Eastleigh Police Station and stuck me in a stinking police cell for 8 hrs.

They took me there in the back of a police car in the back seat with my hands cuffed behind my back with was painful due to the stroke foring my arm into a position it would not go in.

After 8 hrs they asked if I wanted a solicitor to which I said too right I do and a duty doctor.

To cut this story short they released me without charge and with that solicitors help took then to court for wrongful arrest and injury.

It was proved in court without a shadow of doubt that that charge was fabricated and wrongful they knew they could not charge my son for making that hand gesture so tried to pin something else on me.

Hence why they followed for so long btw our dog they said they followed at a distance due to the dog bobbing up and down in the back off the care and said that they did not realize it was a dog at the time and thought it was a person in distress lol

My dog knowing it was recovering from the anesthetic as I told them at the side of the road they just bundled her in the back of a police car and took her to cosham police station for my wife to collect hell we only live a few miles from there so why did they not take her home this caused me distress as no one was watching her indeed a police force that showed no care for an injured animal.

To round off I was awarded £350 for return of car impound fees and £2500 as compensation of wrongful arrest.

The Judge was not impressed with the handling of the incident and was very critical of the way they treat my dog and also awarded her £50.

So you can see why I now have no faith what so ever in the police if they should of stopped anyone it should have been that BMW driver that cut us up on a single lane road approaching a busy roundabout.

BTW that was my best day in court and that solicitor knew from the start how to play it.

Regards

[confused76]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

wow PF that's shocking!! good on you for taking it to court...but what an ordeal to put you, your son and your dog through....x

[garlok]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

Well here in north Wales on Brunstrom's watch we had an appalling case of animal cruelty of their own dogs by two police officers who were found guilty of criminal charges and punished very lightly yet they were allowed to continue in their jobs!!!

Not only that under pressure the police authority were forced to admit that there were some 13 other convicted criminals within the NW force, some with drugs, theft and violence on their records.

How can this be so in a supposedly civilised society? Perhaps the time is coming when we take the law into our own hands and demand the rights under a written constitution to bear arms in our own defence.

regards
Garlok

[pompeyfaith]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

Confused,

Indeed it was a harrowing experience to say the least, however I went to court on the duty solicitors advice and he handled this case extremely well.

The cufflinks caused quiet a bit of pain and I kept pleading with the police to cuff me in front if they really had to cuff me at all and they refused and did not remove them until I was in the cell.

I now have a wrist that is not load bearing. I had a stroke so was hardly a threat to anyone let alone the police.

[pompeyfaith]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

Garlok,

Indeed, there was also those two dogs recently that were left in a car on a hot day, appalling to say the least.

Surely that is common knowledge not to leave any animals inside a hot vehicle, however to the police obviously not.

[PlanB]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

5Corpio, Garlok,

My incident with the Hampshire bill is as follows:
. . . . .
So you can see why I now have no faith what so ever in the police if they should of stopped anyone it should have been that BMW driver that cut us up on a single lane road approaching a busy roundabout.

BTW that was my best day in court and that solicitor knew from the start how to play it.

Regards

If I was the editor of the News of the World I would run your story on the front page. Oh no, silly me, I couldn't do that because it would piss off the police who give me stories and private phone numbers. How many other police corruption and/or misconduct stories have been surpressed by the N.O.W eh?

[5corpio]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

BSkyB shares have fallen for a sixth consecutive day, following the announcement that News Corporation's bid for the company would be referred to the Competition Commission.

News Corp also faces a growing legal problem, after it emerged a group of shareholders had filed a lawsuit in the US against the media group.....R Murdoch suffereing Globally now...News Corp BSkyB Bid Under Scrutiny: Both Companies See Share Price Fall | Business | Sky News

[garlok]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

Well, Well, the ginger tart has gone. What a load of patronising, sycophantic and insulting claptrap she has spoken. She was told to go, must have been, an amoral sleazy despicable piece of humanity like that does not just "resign". Murdoch told her to get her ass out of it before she did any more damage.

At last someone has had the guts to say that the lot of them can be hauled before that Commons Select Committee on a Speaker's arrest warrant by his sheriffs. AND please note flung into the dungeons at the Palace of Westminster. About time the law was imposed on these vile people.

The really sinister thing about all this should be of concern to us all. When it suits the "establishment", this technology does not exist ( to trap terrorists and the like) but they acknolwedge it when something like this happens. It definitely does exist so what are the banks and other agencies really up to?? Anything if the performance of the Metropolitan Police is anything to go by. That dickhead who did appear before the committee, "methinks he doth protest too much" as Willy Shakes wrote" Clearly a suspect, definitely a flight risk your honour, no bail!

regards
Garlok

[pompeyfaith]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

Why did she not go in 2003 when she admitted giving money to the police in a select committee meeting.

[MrsD]

Re: commons debate on phone hacking

because some of these guys think the normal laws don't apply to them
dangerous muppets think they are above the law
makes you wonder what else is going on without a doubt