Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Thanks charity, that has to be good news and bad for the Murdoch coven.
regards
Garlok
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
commons debate on phone hacking
Collapse
X
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/phone-hacke...130047817.html
The News of the World investigator at the heart of Britain's phone hacking scandal has been ordered by a court to reveal who instructed him to illegally access voicemails, lawyers said.
Glenn Mulcaire, who was jailed for six months in 2007 for intercepting messages on royal aides' phones, has until August 31 to provide the information, which could be damning for executives at the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid.
Media law firm Schillings won the disclosure order in February at the request of actor Steve Coogan, who believes his own phone was hacked, but Mulcaire had sought to appeal.
However, the Court of Appeal has now refused him permission, the lawyers said in a statement Friday................
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/mulcaire-su...170915002.html
The private investigator jailed over phone hacking for the News of the World is taking legal action against the newspaper's publisher News International.
Glenn Mulcaire, who was jailed for six months in 2007 for intercepting messages on royal aides' phones, has lodged papers at the High Court.
A spokeswoman for News International, which owned the now-defunct Sunday tabloid, confirmed the action was being taken, adding that "the claim will be vigorously contested"..............
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Do you mean that Jan Ludwig Hoch has teamed up with Shergar's trainer, Richard John Bingham?Last edited by CleverClogs (RIP); 19 August 2011, 09:12.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Or some other persons, perhaps!Originally posted by CleverClogs View PostHere's a thought - could Murdoch have been the Criminal Mastermind behind the riots, using the unrest as a form of camouflage?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Here's a thought - could Murdoch have been the Criminal Mastermind behind the riots, using the unrest as a form of camouflage?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
New arrest in phone-hacking case
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/arrest-phon...141001353.html
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
The more I read & hear of the characters involved in this debacle..........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piW9M...eature=related
"Welcome to the hotel california
Such a lovely place
Such a lovely face
They livin' it up at the hotel california
What a nice surprise, bring your alibis"
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
For a masterclass in that discipline, allegedly NI's tax returns take some beating!Originally posted by CleverClogs View PostI understood that "Lord" Ashcroft was a tax avoider rather than a tax evader.
I'm sure I read that HMRC file them under 'fiction'
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Hi Charity,
Ashcroft being a large donor to the Con party was given a peerage. He was well known for keeping his affars somewhat secret and offshore to be outside the tax jurisdiction of the UK. As this became known more publicly he gave an undertaking that he would bring his affairs back "onshore" and become a full legitimate tax payer. There were serious questions being asked round about the election time and just before if memory serves correctly because he had not it was alleged honoured this undertaking yet had not had the basic decency to relinquish his peerage and please note still has not.
regards
Garlok
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Yes in principle CC, but following the debacle of the IR35 court case a few years ago the bewigged buffoon in his twisted and biased judgement implied that all tax avoiders (perfectly legal) were now to be lumped in with criminal tax evaders then as now a criminal offence. Why should the judgment and ALL of its implications not apply to Ashcroft who has openly boasted of his tax avoidance and his false promises to bring all his affairs back within UK jursidiction if they gave him a peerage. Which he clearly has not honoured.
Until he does then my statements stand.
regards
Garlok
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Originally posted by garlok View PostYes mate,
Its the story which comes up from the link in your own post number 98 above. He's having a go at Ed Milliband's Communications Director. I didn't know anyhting till I read that link.
regards
Garlok




I didn't mean a link to that Telegraph story, I meant any link to the other stuff in your post!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
I understood that "Lord" Ashcroft was a tax avoider rather than a tax evader.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Yes mate,
Its the story which comes up from the link in your own post number 98 above. He's having a go at Ed Milliband's Communications Director. I didn't know anyhting till I read that link.
regards
Garlok
Leave a comment:
-
Re: commons debate on phone hacking
Hi Garlok,Originally posted by garlok View PostBack to the Telegraph's "Ashcroft" story. He's got a fat lot to shout about hasn't he. Lied barefacedly to get his seat in the Lords and remains a criminal tax evader.
A quotation springs to mind. "Don't throw stones if you live in a glasshouse" and "Liars need long memories"
Garlok
Have you got a link?
I done a Google search but didn't see anything specific.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: