22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

[frublet]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

My late dad was also a brave solider having served the maximum 27 yrs in the Royal Marines, however he remained true to what he was taught and was a credit to local society and did not resort to the unhand and illegal tactics of this guy.

I expected people to be angry but I just felt the need to mention his past.

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

I expected people to be angry but I just felt the need to mention his past.

Why? Are we meant to be impressed that a "once gentleman" is now a prick? (disclaimer - this is my opinion and not an official response from AAD)

Sorry. No can do.

[pompeyfaith]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

Frublet,

I am not angry far from it, however there needs to be some defining lines here.

[frublet]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

Why? Are we meant to be impressed that a "once gentleman" is now a prick? (disclaimer - this is my opinion and not an official response from AAD)

Sorry. No can do.

I don't recall saying that he was a gentleman, nothing could be further from the truth! I simply stumbled on this forum and, after having read the posts about J Boast, felt compelled to mention his past and I repeat from my original post, I in no way condone his actions.
I won't trouble you guys further.

[CleverClogs (RIP)]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

I expected people to be angry but I just felt the need to mention his past.

When one considers his manifest dishonesty and thoroughly unpleasant attitudes, one might believe that he never even soiled an army uniform.

Had he indeed been as courageous as has lately been reported, he should have been awarded at least one 'gong', but a search of the London Gazette reveals nothing. Was he working 'under cover', using the name of "W. Mittie"?

[frublet]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

Had he indeed been as courageous as has lately been reported

Do I take it that you don't believe me or are you just throwing mud around?

[CleverClogs (RIP)]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

Do I take it that you don't believe me or are you just throwing mud around?

I refuse to respond directly to that false dichotomy and merely declare that I had stated the fact that there is no record in the London Gazette of someone called 'John Boast' having been awarded a medal for gallantry.

Please do check for yourself, at link

You may also find the Guildhall Library Guide (PDF link) to be helpful.

[CleverClogs (RIP)]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

I won't trouble you guys further.

Do I take it that you don't believe me or are you just throwing mud around?

Hmm.

[garlok]

Re: 22.35 on ITV1 Exposure:Bailiffs

Hi frublet,

The simplest answer here is to provide publicly the direct link to the London Gazette entry for this hateful despicable man's "honours".

Then, based upon his wilful lawbreaking so expertly placed on film by professional investigators, we can then campaign to have his honours removed from him or expose him further for what he really is.

It is a very brave man indeed that preys upon the most vulnerable in society and perhaps you and he should be mindful of a quotation from John Ruskin:-

"truly great people are most noticable for their humility" or words to that effect.

I have been fortunate to have met world wide some truly great minds and the people that own those minds and the quotation is oh so true.

regards
Garlok