GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script SXGuy's UE Diary - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SXGuy's UE Diary

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    Thanks for that Paul. I would need to re word it slightly, as they did provide an agreement last month after 11 months, but you may recall the recon terms are not those from the account due to missing paragraphs. So it would need to read something like, i received documents which were not a true copy as they ommit paragraphs mentioned within the prescribed terms, and without a true copy i am prejudiced.

    On a side note, if I wanted to at least try and put them off from issuing any court papers at all, do you think i still have an opportunity to offer a monthly repayment?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul.
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    I think the most important thing to do, is to ask for a copy of the credit agreement upon which they will rely in the course of proceedings.

    You have to remember that the CPR requires exchange of docs BEFORE Proceedings.

    I would also say, something like, i made a request under s78(1) CCA 1974 on ...... no reply was recieved. The purpose of my request was to consider the excessivly high rate of interest applied to my account. At a time when i told MBNA i was in financial difficulties they increased the rate of interest by over 50% . Without my documents i could not consider if they were allowed to do this.

    Also i would like you to provide me with the Default notice you intend to rely upon along with statements of account covering the period of the default notice too. I do not recall recieving a default notice in any event, although i was told by MBNA that this would be issued in any event and that i should ignore it in any event.
    I believe the manner in which MBNA dealt with my account at a time i was vulnerable was unfair and gives rise to an unfair relationship and clearly without the agreement i am prejudiced.


    I will draw the courts attention to this letter should you issue proceedings without disclosing the necessary documents which i have requested.


    Something like the above could be worked into the letter i did for the other user, but do make sure you arent making yourself look a tit by quoting irrelevent parts of the CPR or saying they havent complied with the CPR iof they have

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    Hi Paul, have you managed to have a think regarding how i should word my reply to their letter of claim?

    Sorry to bug you, im just really anxous to get something sent off.

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    Originally posted by Paul. View Post
    ok then there is a challenge that can be made to their letter.

    Non compliance with the CPR Pre action protocols leaves the claimant in difficulty with costs.

    let me have a think, ive got relatives over from australia so my time is very limited at present
    Thank you very much Paul. Your advice is always much apreciated, i understand you are busy.

    I need to serve them with a reply by 22nd December, so idealy, recorded delivery, i should send it out by 20th?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul.
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    Originally posted by SXGuy View Post
    Just a quick question, whats the likelyhood of an admission and an offer of repayment in reply being accepted with no further action?

    Have i missed the boat now, or do you think they would still consider it?

    Would it need to be some sort of consent order at this stage?

    The more questions paul asks, the more my replies seem abit weak for a good defence. The only defence i have is s78, which we all know, can be remedied in court, by which time, there will be costs added.

    My mother can not afford to repay the whole lot, over 8k, she hasnt really got a lump sum to offer either, but she could afford a repayment of some sort.

    Really, i need to weigh up her chances of success against her chance of defeat, and if its more likely she will be defeated, id rather sort some sort of repayment now before costs start to be added.
    ok then there is a challenge that can be made to their letter.

    Non compliance with the CPR Pre action protocols leaves the claimant in difficulty with costs.

    let me have a think, ive got relatives over from australia so my time is very limited at present

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    Just a quick question, whats the likelyhood of an admission and an offer of repayment in reply being accepted with no further action?

    Have i missed the boat now, or do you think they would still consider it?

    Would it need to be some sort of consent order at this stage?

    The more questions paul asks, the more my replies seem abit weak for a good defence. The only defence i have is s78, which we all know, can be remedied in court, by which time, there will be costs added.

    My mother can not afford to repay the whole lot, over 8k, she hasnt really got a lump sum to offer either, but she could afford a repayment of some sort.

    Really, i need to weigh up her chances of success against her chance of defeat, and if its more likely she will be defeated, id rather sort some sort of repayment now before costs start to be added.
    Last edited by SXGuy; 15 December 2012, 13:11.

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    All she remembers, is her min monthly payment was around 250 a month, interest was something like 34%, she wrote to them and asked if she could lower the amount. they replied and said they would agree £150 a month.

    After around 6 months, her situation changed again, she wrote again asking to pay token £1 per month until her situation improved, the wrote back saying, they cant accept an arrangement for that amount but would freeze interest and charges and would accept whatever she could afford.

    around 6 months later, they sent a letter saying, regarding our previous letter, your account is terminated and will be assigned to DLC. Dont remember if she ever got the previous letter or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    Originally posted by Paul. View Post
    ok MBNA

    when you were in difficulties, did MBNA up the interest rate ?

    Did they increase it to a high level? in many cases they go from like 12% to 34%
    I will have to ask if my mother remembers, but yes as far as i know, interest did go up very high at one point.

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    No default notice, not sure if one was ever sent.

    My mother was in arrangements to pay all her creditors token amounts, this was Pre AAD, they all told her DN's would be issued as a matter of normal collection procedures and to ignore it.

    She did, but didnt keep all of them. Im unsure if she ever received one from MBNA or she threw it away.

    I have a termination letter from MBNA, and a notice of assignment from DLC, dated a few weeks apart, so no cross over there.

    I am unsure whether it was assigned during the DN period or not for reasons above.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul.
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    ok MBNA

    when you were in difficulties, did MBNA up the interest rate ?

    Did they increase it to a high level? in many cases they go from like 12% to 34%

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul.
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    default notice?

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    I dont know if this is a valid issue, but initially, we explained that the previous arrangement with MBNA was all we could afford, they declined, said it was unrealistic and would apply for a charging order to secure the debt. letter followed the next day.

    That was when a request was made, to establish where we stand.

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    no unfair charges, no unfair telephone contact, they removed the number as soon as we said all communication in writing.

    The only issue is the failure in s78.

    (i can prob guess what you will say!)

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul.
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    do you have any issues other than 78 (1) CCA?

    Do you have say an unfair charges issue?

    Unfair telephone contact?

    Any other issues at all?

    Leave a comment:


  • SXGuy
    replied
    Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

    Originally posted by Paul. View Post
    no, i wouldnt send that as it stands.

    Im going out now, taking my son out so ill be out for a while, but that letter would not satisfy a preaction protocol reply
    Thanks for the input Paul.

    If you could kindly advise the best response to make when you get a chance that would be great.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X