SXGuy's UE Diary

[Deepie]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Update.

GPB Solicitors on behalf of IQOR and Lloyds have written.

They have been contacted by iQor in relation to monies owed to lloyds.
If full payment or proposal isnt made within 10 days, they may be instructed to commence legal proceedings.

Says they are instructed NOT to enter into correspondance with you at this stage but to refer the matter to iQOR.

So will send threat 0 gram, letter before action, to iQor.

Should i send a copy to GPB as well?

I would if it were me............

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Update.

GPB Solicitors on behalf of IQOR and Lloyds have written.

They have been contacted by iQor in relation to monies owed to lloyds.
If full payment or proposal isnt made within 10 days, they may be instructed to commence legal proceedings.

Says they are instructed NOT to enter into correspondance with you at this stage but to refer the matter to iQOR.

So will send threat 0 gram, letter before action, to iQor.

Should i send a copy to GPB as well?

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

little update

Triton RBS inhouse puppets are now dealing with the Mint agreement, So have replied with account sold in dispute.

See what happens.

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

LOL well. if it goes the same way as last time, ill reply with my er you dont need a sig letter, and they will reply with, a SAR is £10 not £1.

The CCA Request Merry go round.

[ScabHunter]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Forgot to say earlier, Natwest returned my letter i sent them previously, and they have circled around the bit that says section 77-79 and they have put a big cross over CCA1974.

I dont know what twats they have working for them, but they seem to think that it doesnt apply from the way they have crossed it out.

Sounds like someone in the Chief Executive office learning to play noughts and crosses.

SH

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Forgot to say earlier, Natwest returned my letter i sent them previously, and they have circled around the bit that says section 77-79 and they have put a big cross over CCA1974.

I dont know what twats they have working for them, but they seem to think that it doesnt apply from the way they have crossed it out.

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Little update.

Rockwell re M&S have replied to previous letter, on hold while they investigate.

Natwest have again said, that they require a signature to complete the CCA Request. The standard tick box template they sent previously.

So i will send back a 1 liner saying refer to my previous letter and enclose a copy of the no signature template.

They can keep this up as long as they like lol.

Wish they would learn from the other Natwest account and just confirm no CCA and move on, wasting postage stamps here.

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Niddy confirms Barclaycard is

The prescribed terms they sent, are not those that came with the agreement.

So will send missing prescribed terms tomorrow.

Cheers your Nid-Ship!

[SA Gold]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

So will send to Niddy for a look, but i have a feeling i know the answer (hopefully).

fingers crossed!

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Update, Link Financial Re Barclaycard have finally sent something.

Application form / Agreement. Looks like it was a microfisure or something because its so small i can barely read it without a magnifying glass.

Appears to have prescribed terms (not sure if it shows all the PT's) but no past or current terms and conditions, which they did state they would send in their original letter.

So will send to Niddy for a look, but i have a feeling i know the answer (hopefully).

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Update, Rockwell re M&S have replied to my Account sold in dispute letter, sent weeks ago.

Enclosed application form, and a letter saying they wont get into corespondance regarding enforceability, and will take further recovery action if payment proposal isnt made.

Well, M & S sent all the stuff last time, Niddy confirmed Enforceable, but what Rockwell sent, isnt.

So will treat as UE for now, and send Missing prescribed terms tomorrow.

[The Tech Clerk]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

ain!t that HSBC excuse?

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

If they posted an envelope of ashes it would at least be something LOL

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

And i should imagine they "accidently" had a fire that burnt a lot of bad debts just before the bailout as well lol

[SXGuy]

Re: SXGuy's UE Diary

Nope they gave that one up.

When i sent them the no signature template, they wrote back and returned my letter and wrote in red biro "SAR", and added a letter basically saying, please send £10 not £1.

So i ignored it, then they sent a letter saying how disapointed they were with non payment, so i wrote back with UE Final Response, which they ignored.

Then got a letter saying, they cant enforce, but im under obligation to repay debt, a day later, triton letter turns up.

Im not really worried about it, i have all the proof i need to set aside anything they try on, what annoys me is their total incompetence.

EDIT: gonna wait and see what their in-house monkeys do next, ive blocked their number (funny how its a london number yet based in basildon lol) if they send anything else ignoring what ive written previously, do you think a complaint should be my next move? or should i just ignore the idiots until they send something of value?