New and confused

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

CATALOGUE SIMPLY BE
£1300
04/2011
SENDING TOKEN BUT NOT ACCEPTED
ARREARS
RELIABLE COLLECTIONS

09/09/2011 CCA Request sent
23/09/2011 Letter received. Niddy says
03/10/2011 Letter received re home contact 05/09.Ignore
03/10/2011..harassment and threat of doorstep visit letter sent
14/10/2011..Letter from JD Williams accepting account is unenforceable

28/10/2011...Letter from Reliable threat of court action
28/10/2011.. letter received saying my conduct is not acceptable and will not be tolerated
11/11/2011..threat of court action letter received, must pay in 24 hours
25/11/2011.. Letter saying account is being reassigned.May result in court acvtivity or debt collector calling at my home if i dont pay toward debt in 7 days. DO NOT IGNORE
28/11/2011.. Niddy special sent (see post 389)
10/12/2011..Letter titled Residency Confirmed received. Says they've failed to contact us so have undertaken investigations to trace us and confirmed we still live here. The debt will not go away!! Must make immediate payment
04/01/2012..2nd Niddy special sent (see post 567)
21/01/2012.. Letter from Simply Be saying account is being transferred to legal adviors re ccj,warrant of execution by bailiffs or attachment of earnings.If i dont pay in 7 days a solicitor will call at my home. Failure to respond will result in a default on my credit file. Admin charge for each missed payment reminder. DO NOT IGNORE

Update

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: New and confused

Did we not send a special to these tossers at home shopping?

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

Did we not send a special to these tossers at home shopping?

We sent a couple. Post 389 and 567

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: New and confused

Ok I'll come back to this next week.

Just pm me Monday to jog memory please

[CleverClogs (RIP)]

Re: New and confused

21/01/2012.. Letter from Simply Be saying account is being transferred to legal adviors re ccj,warrant of execution by bailiffs or attachment of earnings.If i dont pay in 7 days a solicitor will call at my home.

Really?

Why the buggery might a solicitor do that? Does he need the exercise?

It is, of course, quite a serious offence contrary to section 21 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (link) to pretend to be or to pass oneself off as a solicitor when one is nothing of the sort.

I doubt that they will send anyone, though.

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

Ok I'll come back to this next week.

Just pm me Monday to jog memory please

Will do. Thanks Niddy

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: New and confused

Really?

Why the buggery might a solicitor do that? Does he need the exercise?

It is, of course, quite a serious offence contrary to section 21 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (link) to pretend to be or to pass oneself off as a solicitor when one is nothing of the sort.

I doubt that they will send anyone, though.

they get bloody worse don't they? They've more chance of winning the lottery though, than being paid for this debt

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

Really?

Why the buggery might a solicitor do that? Does he need the exercise?

It is, of course, quite a serious offence contrary to section 21 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (link) to pretend to be or to pass oneself off as a solicitor when one is nothing of the sort.

I doubt that they will send anyone, though.

Me too. They've threatened allsorts but have the memory span of a goldfish so forget to follow it through. Think this is about the third time they've been going to hand the account over. i feel another Niddy special coming on

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

they get bloody worse don't they? They've more chance of winning the lottery though, than being paid for this debt

So glad to hear that

[CleverClogs (RIP)]

Re: New and confused

[MODE="AOL"]Me too.[/MODE]

They've threatened allsorts but have the memory span of a goldfish so forget to follow it through. Think this is about the third time they've been going to hand the account over. i feel another Niddy special coming on

If they do send someone who claims to be a solicitor - and who isn't - at least you now know for what he could be arrested.

It's not for 'soliciting'.

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

If they do send someone who claims to be a solicitor - and who isn't - at least you now know for what he could be arrested.

It's not for 'soliciting'.

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

2nd post at 6.30pm. What's that all about??
Notice of Assignment from Arrow Global. Says MBNA have assigned all its rights, title and interest to them. Account will be managed by Westcott Credit from 7th December 2011!!

Should i send the same letter as Bobo for this Niddy?

[mk_chatham]

Re: New and confused

Should i send the same letter as Bobo for this Niddy?

Hi Samsmum

I followed the discussion on the other thread and think the best reply would be Account sold in dispute

As Wescott will be managing the account this should really be sent to them. Does the notice of assignment give you the contact details for Wescott. Also note that there may be a new reference number for this account from the new owner.

MK

[samsmum]

Re: New and confused

Hi, yes the contact details for Westcott are on the letter along with a new reference number. Thank you

[PlanB]

Re: New and confused

Hi Samsmum

I followed the discussion on the other thread and think the best reply would be Account sold in dispute

As Wescott will be managing the account this should really be sent to them. Does the notice of assignment give you the contact details for Wescott. Also note that there may be a new reference number for this account from the new owner.

MK

My letter is the same as Samsmum and it gives me all Westcot contact details and their own new reference number. I note these letters from Arrow refer to them as having purchased the rights to the debt from 7th December 2011 which probably means they've spent the last six weeks divvying them out between AIC & Wescot, so maybe Wescot are on the brink of writing to me anyway and I should wait for that letter