GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script New and confused - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New and confused

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • diddlydee
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    I once found some really awful music, and when I picked up the receiver to a known "kitchen sales" number, said "your call will be answered shortly, thanks for holding" and then placed the receiver by my pc speaker and played the music.........

    I'm not sure how long they held on for, but they didn't call back!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pixie
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    "Velly solly, lestaulant not open now; caw back rayter!"
    That's actually funny Cloggy!

    Samsmum, send Our Templates | Harassment & Intimidation Templates | Harassment by Telephone or you could have fun with them a la Cloggy

    Leave a comment:


  • samsmum
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    You do cheer my days Mr Clog

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    "Velly solly, lestaulant not open now; caw back rayter!"

    Leave a comment:


  • samsmum
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Originally posted by samsmum View Post
    CATALOGUE SIMPLY BE
    £1300
    04/2011
    SENDING TOKEN BUT NOT ACCEPTED
    ARREARS
    RELIABLE COLLECTIONS

    09/09/2011 CCA Request sent
    23/09/2011 Letter received. Niddy says
    03/10/2011 Letter received re home contact 05/09.Ignore
    03/10/2011..harassment and threat of doorstep visit letter sent
    14/10/2011..Letter from JD Williams accepting account is unenforceable

    28/10/2011...Letter from Reliable threat of court action
    28/10/2011.. letter received saying my conduct is not acceptable and will not be tolerated
    11/11/2011..threat of court action letter received, must pay in 24 hours
    25/11/2011.. Letter saying account is being reassigned.May result in court acvtivity or debt collector calling at my home if i dont pay toward debt in 7 days. DO NOT IGNORE
    28/11/2011.. Niddy special sent (see post 389)
    10/12/2011..Letter titled Residency Confirmed received. Says they've failed to contact us so have undertaken investigations to trace us and confirmed we still live here. The debt will not go away!! Must make immedite payment
    04/01/2012..2nd Niddy special sent (see post 567)
    21/01/2012.. Letter from Simply Be saying account is being transferred to legal adviors re ccj,warrant of execution by bailiffs or attachment of earnings.If i dont pay in 7 days a solicitor will call at my home. Failure to respond will result in a default on my credit file. Admin charge for each missed payment reminder. DO NOT IGNORE
    11/02/2012..list of dca's that may be acquiring my account,rights title and interest in the next 2 weeks
    15/02/2012..Letter from Reliable apologising for comments made and stating all collection activity will cease. Account now closed.Thank you so much to Niddy and everyone.
    26/03/2012...Letter from Fredericksons. Been instructed to collect £1731 immediately
    27/03/2012..Letter sent informing them account is closed
    Morning. Getting phone calls from Fred's now. Shall i just ignore or answer and stick the phone in a drawer? Let them waste money chasing a debt that's written off
    Last edited by samsmum; 11 April 2012, 09:33.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pixie
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    You must have clicked on the multiquote button.

    You can delete the quote you don't want

    Leave a comment:


  • samsmum
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    Yes, of course. There'd be bugger all point in it existing if some judgements were missing.


    You could, if you wished, but I'd be more inclined either to tell Howard, Cohen and Fagin lekh tiz'da'yen (if you'll pardon my Yiddish ) or that you'll be reporting them to the Solicitors' Regulatory Authority for sending a letter threatening action that cannot be taken.
    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    Dear Sirs,

    Thank you for your most entertaining letter which I received today, in which you were kind enough to list the ways an alleged County Court Judgement would be enforced against me if I did not pay you a large sum of money at once.

    I do feel I should point out to you a flaw in your plans which I believe you may find significant: the alleged County Court Judgement does not exist.

    Do you bother to think in your company? If you did, you would surely have checked with the Registry Trust before making threats of impossible enforcement action. You might even have wondered why a judgement that was allegedly given in 2009 had not been enforced already, or considered the likely effect on the reputation of the law profession as a whole as well as yourselves to make such threats in writing.

    Yours Faithfully,

    Clever Clogs
    Like it. You're getting very good at these letters. You taking lessons from a certain Mr Niddy??

    Oops. Don't know why i've quoted 2 posts. Wouldn't know how to if i wanted to :-)
    Last edited by samsmum; 10 April 2012, 16:29.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pixie
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Sorry to hear that the op doesn't seem to have worked

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Dear Sirs,

    Thank you for your most entertaining letter which I received today, in which you were kind enough to list the ways an alleged County Court Judgement would be enforced against me if I did not pay you a large sum of money at once.

    I do feel I should point out to you a flaw in your plans which I believe you may find significant: the alleged County Court Judgement does not exist.

    Do you bother to think in your company? If you did, you would surely have checked with the Registry Trust before making threats of impossible enforcement action. You might even have wondered why a judgement that was allegedly given in 2009 had not been enforced already, or considered the likely effect on the reputation of the law profession as a whole as well as yourselves to make such threats in writing.

    Yours Faithfully,

    Clever Clogs

    Leave a comment:


  • samsmum
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    Yes, of course. There'd be bugger all point in it existing if some judgements were missing.


    You could, if you wished, but I'd be more inclined either to tell Howard, Cohen and Fagin lekh tiz'da'yen (if you'll pardon my Yiddish ) or that you'll be reporting them to the Solicitors' Regulatory Authority for sending a letter threatening action that cannot be taken.
    Thanks. In that case then it definitely doesn't exist and i've got a letter stamped by the court proving it. If they'd asked for proof when i told them the CCJ didn't exist i would've sent it but as they didn't i'll send it now and see what they have to say

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Originally posted by samsmum View Post
    Checked on there and nothing was registered. Does everything show up on there do you know?
    Yes, of course. There'd be bugger all point in it existing if some judgements were missing.

    Not sure if you can ring the court to check..
    You could, if you wished, but I'd be more inclined either to tell Howard, Cohen and Fagin lekh tiz'da'yen (if you'll pardon my Yiddish ) or that you'll be reporting them to the Solicitors' Regulatory Authority for sending a letter threatening action that cannot be taken.

    Leave a comment:


  • samsmum
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Checked on there and nothing was registered. Does everything show up on there do you know? Not sure if you can ring the court to check..

    Leave a comment:


  • CleverClogs (RIP)
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    I know you have a letter saying the CCJ was set aside or whatever, but have you checked that this actually happened?

    Trust Online

    Leave a comment:


  • samsmum
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    Very true Pixie.
    Could've done with some good news today...Physio's passing me back to the surgeon again. Looking like this op hasn't worked either. Who needs a right arm anyway?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pixie
    replied
    Re: New and confused

    They might think it's not relevant if they believe there's already a ccj against you for that account.

    Send them the proof that the ccj was set aside.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X