GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Roger UE Diary - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roger UE Diary

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Egg(formaly) Barclaycard
    Type of account : Credit Card
    Date commenced : Nov 2007
    Approx balance : £3,200
    Date last paid : March 2013
    Are you on arrangement or not paying: Was on an arrangement
    Status (default/in arrears/up-to-date) : Default
    Account owner (who is writing to you, a DCA or the lender): Asset Link Capitol (No 5) Limited [FCA lapsed] Appointed LINK Financial Outsourcing
    Barclaycard moved account from Egg Nov 2011 and changed Account No.
    I have a printed copy of the Egg Agreement which I had kept! Curiously the Egg signature dated day before Customer signature date
    I used templates available elsewhere on the Internet with Barclaycard
    I have never asked for nor received a s.78 from Barclaycard!
    Nov 2011 "We want to make sure you have all the important details and dates you need to know as we finish moving your account to Barclaycard. As previously notified you we're unable to issue you a new Barclaycard due to the condition of either your existing Barclaycard or migrating Egg account. "
    DEC 2011 Statement "Your account is closed" "Please note your account is now closed. You'll continue to receive statements until the balance and any interest is fully paid. As your account is now closed, if anyone requests payement from your account, it may be automatically returned to that company."
    MERCERS Default Notices June 13 and Nov 13 No NOA from Barclaycard
    Barclaycard Letter AUG 14 " Failure to Report to Credit Agencies. Will be dated from Nov 13 .."
    Barclaycard last letter was August 14 . "We've identified that we have been reporting inaccurate information about your account to Credit Referemce Agencies. We apologise for this error and we're now correcting it.."
    OCT 16 ASSET LINK "We are writing to confirm that Barclaycard has assigned your account to Asset Link ..it is important you contact Link to discuss your intentions regarding this account"
    MAR 17 LINK "We have not written to you for some time as we have had to validate your address. We would like you to contact us..to confirm your intentions regarding...your account"
    (LF001 & D34_4)
    APR 17 LINK "Statement of Account- Notice of sums in Arrears" Curiously LINK Now describes this as Barclaycard Loan Agreement under Account Number: ???????????"
    OCT 17 LINK "Statement of Account" now Statement 2 described as Credit Agreement under Account Number: ???????????"
    OCT 17 LINK
    "..We give you 14 days notice that the account will be passed to Kearns Solicitors.."
    OCT 17 Posted Recorded s.78 request with £1 PO to Link
    JAN 18 LINK Phone Call JAN 18 LINK "..We need to speak to you to discuss this account.." Various SMS. Calls RECORDED APR 18 LINK "Statement of Barclaycard Account" JUN 18 LINK (LF001 & D17F) "..entitled to immediate repayment..." ; JUN 18 LINK (LF001 & D34_4) "..had to validate your address..." CALLS (again)
    JUN 18 SAR requested posted to BARCLAYCARD : JUL LINK Harassment Letter sent : JUL LINK .".dealing with your complaint." :
    JUL LINK ."we have not harassed you.. letters only .but only if you talk to us.." CCA Outstanding:
    JUL SAR received
    NOV 2018 Link S.78 CCA received (Link have had this for a year!) Have sent copy to Niddy for review

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied

    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    Intelligent Finance (Halifax)
    Type of account : Credit Card
    Date commenced : Apl 2006
    Approx balance : £2,100
    Date last paid : Feb 2012
    Are you on arrangement or not paying: Was on an arrangement
    Status (default/in arrears/up-to-date) : Default
    Account owner (who is writing to you, a DCA or the lender): was Halifax from JUL 2017 CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) LIMITED

    I used templates available elsewhere on the Internet with Halifax
    Apr 2014 Halifax sent me s.78 CCA (at their instigation) which Niddy has seen
    It's
    I have a letter dated 2014 " I can confirm when we receive your signed credit agreement, we scan it and keep a copy electronically. We then destroy the original."
    All has been quiet apart from year statements till now.
    Halifax Oct 2015 "However I have just received a letter saying they have instructed Wescot Credit Services Ltd to arrange collection of the outstanding balance"
    Wescot's letter 18 / 11/ 2015 ".. we have been instructed by our client, Halifax Credit Card.."
    AAD advised "Not to respond, see what they send next, keep Us updated"
    Wescot reminder (undated) arrived 26/11 "We wrote to you recently.." Have NOT replied.
    Wescot letter arrived Dec 2015 "our enquiries have confirmed you are resident at the address above but we have not yet had contact from you". Have NOT replied
    Wescot letter arrived Dec 2015 ""We have written to you on several occasions asking you to contact us, however to date we have not received a response. In an attempt to close this matter our client has agreed we can offer you a discount to settle this account .." ".. We have previously outlined the benefits of contacting us, however should you choose not to our client has instructed us to continue seeking recovery of the full balance".
    "..If we are unable to discuss this matter with you and agree a way forward on your account it will be returned to our client.."
    DEC 2015 Recorded Delivery s.78 Request
    to WESTCOT
    JAN 2016 2F (WESCOT)
    "Confirmation of Residency"
    JAN 2016 2F at phone won't prove ID

    MAR 2016 HALIFAX " ..we've transferred your HALIFAX debt to debt collection agency. Moorcroft.." There is an Outstanding s.78 with WESCOT
    MAR 2016 MOORCROFT ".. We have been instructed by HALIFAX.." ".. Both our client and we do not wish to take further debt recovery action but if agreement cannot be reached by 28/03/16 we may have no alternative.."
    APR 2016 MOORCROFT " Automated phone calls (2) ."

    APR 2016 MOORCROFT ".. To prevent possible further debt recovery action.." ".. If you do not contact us..we may .. recommend to our clients that they consider possible further debt recovery action against you .."
    APR 2016 MOORCROFT ".. MONTHLY INSTALMENT OFFER .."
    MAY 2016 MOORCROFT ".As no agreement has been reached we have now been asked to review your account to consider the steps which MAY be taken.."
    # "..Continue in our attempts to contact you by letter and phone"
    # "..arrange to call at your home address.."
    # "..continued adverse reporting on your credit file"

    MAY 2016 MOORCROFT "..Account passed to Home Collections Division .."
    # "..MAY involve a local rep calling.."
    # "..MAY offer a substantial discount.."
    # "..if can't afford MAY still help.."
    JUN 2016 MOORCROFT "..DISCOUNT OFFER.. Our client MAY be able to offer a substantial discount .."
    AUG 2016 HALIFAX "2016 Statement " Had these in the past will just file
    SEP 2016 HALIFAX (but posted by ROBINSON WAY) "..we have transferred your Halifax Credit Card to..Robinson Way..We've instructed Robinson Way to arrange collection of the outstanding amount.. "

    SEP 2016 ROBINSON WAY"..Your account details have been passed to us from HALIFAX... contact within next seven days.. "
    OCT 2016 ROBINSON WAY "..Contact Required. ."

    NOV 2016 ROBINSON WAY "..Help Available - Balance Reduction Offer. ."
    JUL 2017 ASSIGNMENT - CABOT FINANCIAL (UK) LIMITED
    CABOT Phone Calls commence and ongoing (recorded and blocked by BT)
    AUG 2017 CABOT FINANCIAL (EUROPE) LIMITED - current creditor CABOT FINACIAL (UK) LIMITED - Letter now received (dated over week ago) . It looks and reads innocous.

    SEP 2017 CABOT Letter ".. If we do not hear from you we will continue to contact you.."
    SEP 2017 CABOT letter
    ".. your account has been reviewed for legal action. contact with 28 days so we can prevent this from happening.." .. " We can help you to avoid this."
    OCT 2017 SWID sent
    OCT 2017 CABOT letter
    ".. consequences of your not contacting us.. What Legal Action could mean? if you don't contact within next 14 days we will proceed as highlighted above.." But what are their words? POTENTIAL LEGAL ACTION! WE COULD! OUR TYPICAL APPROACH WOULD BE TO INSTRUCT A SOLICTOR ." Nothing of a LBA here!
    My SWID and Their Letter have crossed in the post! So have just filed and will do nothing.

    OCT 2017 CABOT letter ".. dealing with my complaint.." OCT 2017 CABOT letter "..have not been able to resolve your complaint as quickly as .. would have liked...."
    NOV 2017 CABOT letter response to SWID "..Resolved your complaint and that there wasn't a Dispute with Halifax whom they quote as having "Complied with CCA request on May 2014 and passed to another department to send out to customer - unable to provide info on when this was sent out, .."

    Originally posted by Pixie View Post
    This is where I'm different as I liked to send a letter such as SWID pretty much on first contact from a dca then I ignored further letters unless they were really threatening court action etc. IMO if you later sent a SWID they could come back with "so why didn't you tell us that at the start?"
    I have updated the Diary entry as above. I followed the excellent advice of the MODS and sent a SWID. Cabot sent reconstituted statements and CCA . It doesn't change Niddy's UE opinion..
    My response from now on will be in accordance with Pixie's recommendation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by vaper View Post
    Sorry, no help, but have just enjoyed catching up with your diary
    I to am an avid reader of all the diary's on this Site and the MODS wonderful contributions and the help and good advice given. It has helped me and I hope helps you.

    Originally posted by Still Waving View Post
    If I understand your diary correctly you haven't ever sent a CCA request to Barclaycard, so I'm not sure what reason you would put in a SWID letter (which usually says there is an unfulfilled CCA74 request). Maybe now send a CCA request to LInk, and if Kearns do write, you can refer them to your CCA request to LInk.
    Thank you Still Waving for your help and reasoning!
    The letters previously sent to Barclaycard and Mercer requested confirmation of the CCA (without the £1). Both Barclaycard and MERCER knew that the Account was disputed hence sending a SWID.
    However now that Link have upped the stakes with threatening to refer to Kearns then the CCA74 request (with £1) does look a better tactical choice at this moment and for the reasons you have given

    Leave a comment:


  • Still Waving
    replied
    Originally posted by Roger View Post

    Previously discussed considered s.78 or SWID




    There has been little communication with Link till now. They have jumped straight to threatening with refering to Kearns Solicitors!
    My thinking is to now send a SWID but without mentioning Egg. Otherwise a section 78/77 .
    Any thoughts?
    If I understand your diary correctly you haven't ever sent a CCA request to Barclaycard, so I'm not sure what reason you would put in a SWID letter (which usually says there is an unfulfilled CCA74 request). Maybe now send a CCA request to LInk, and if Kearns do write, you can refer them to your CCA request to LInk.

    Leave a comment:


  • vaper
    replied
    Sorry, no help, but have just enjoyed catching up with your diary

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Egg(formaly) Barclaycard
    Type of account : Credit Card
    Date commenced : Nov 2007
    Approx balance : £3,200
    Date last paid : March 2013
    Are you on arrangement or not paying: Was on an arrangement
    Status (default/in arrears/up-to-date) : Default
    Account owner (who is writing to you, a DCA or the lender): Barclaycard
    Barclaycard moved account from Egg Nov 2011 and changed Account No.
    I have a printed copy of the Egg Agreement which I had kept! Curiously the Egg signature dated day before Customer signature date
    I used templates available elsewhere on the Internet with Barclaycard
    I have never asked for nor received a s.78 from Barclaycard!
    Their letter dated Nov 2011
    "We want to make sure you have all the important details and dates you need to know as we finish moving your account to Barclaycard. As previously notified you we're unable to issue you a new Barclaycard due to the condition of either your existing Barclaycard or migrating Egg account. "
    DEC 2011 Statement "Your account is closed"
    "Please note your account is now closed. You'll continue to receive statements until the balance and any interest is fully paid. As your account is now closed, if anyone requests payement from your account, it may be automatically returned to that company."

    Two Default Notices issued by MERCERS and No NOA
    Barclaycard last letter was August 2014.
    "We've identified that we have been reporting inaccurate information about your account to Credit Referemce Agencies. We apologise for this error and we're now correcting it.."
    OCT 16 ASSET LINK "We are writing to confirm that Barclaycard has assigned your account to Asset Link ..it is important you contact Link to discuss your intentions regarding this account"
    MAR 17 LINK "We have not written to you for some time as we have had to validate your address. We would like you to contact us..to confirm your intentions regarding...your account"
    APR 17 LINK "Statement of Account- Notice of sums in Arrears" Curiously LINK Now describes this as Loan Agreement under Account Number: ???????????"
    OCT 17 LINK "Statement of Account"
    now Statement 2 described as Credit Agreement under Account Number: ???????????"
    OCT 17 LINK "..We give you 14 days notice that the account will be passed to Kearns Solicitors.."
    Previously discussed considered s.78 or SWID
    Barclaycard moved account from Egg Nov 2011 and immediately CLOSED the A/c without any Notice nor reason.
    The A/c No was changed to a BC No and neither terms nor a Credit Card was ever sent.
    Originally posted by Still Waving View Post
    Personally, I think I would await their next letter, as presumably your 'intention' is not to pay.

    Later a SWID letter could be the next option (I assume you were in dispute correspondence with BC). It seems to me that the relevant (and only) Agreement would be the one with Egg. With the passage of time that may not be available, but I think I would delay a CCA request for the time being.

    Others may have different ideas.
    Thank you!
    Thats my thinking putting time before requesting CCA. My credit was good so the only reason for BC closing the Egg Account would be that the Egg Agreement was suspect!!!
    Will wait for their next move!
    There has been little communication with Link till now. They have jumped straight to threatening with refering to Kearns Solicitors!
    My thinking is to now send a SWID but without mentioning Egg. Otherwise a section 78/77 .
    Any thoughts?
    Last edited by Roger; 29 October 2017, 16:28. Reason: spelling typos

    Leave a comment:


  • Spud
    replied
    Looking along your Diary, Unless I have got it wrong, It would appear that since the time that this account has been assigned to cabot you have not written to or contacted them......not that I am knocking that mind....

    As much as it pains me to say this, and believe me it does not come easily........But to be fair to them if you have not told them there is an issue with the account then how can they be expected to know? From their point of view they will just proceed as normal and follow their set route as they periodically review the account

    You do have to remember that they are probably thinking " No contact so we can go for a claim and win by default because the debtor will not bother to respond" etc like they do in many cases

    Yes I know there is a school of thought that says they should be aware what they have bought but we know in reality it does not work that way.

    That's why I am thinking the SWID route may be in order

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    do not rush

    Leave a comment:


  • Spud
    replied
    Agreed, I would say it is too early to go sending a LBA response

    I received the same letter ( from the sound of it) and was in two minds whether to reply or not as until then all they had sent me was non threatening letters BUT in the end decided on a slightly modified SWID/harassment letter which has resulted in no more contact since ( approx 8 weeks ago)

    Whether you reply or not is down to your circumstances, With me it came down to tactics and playing the long game and by not advising them now that there was a problem ( SWID) I would not be able realistically to rely upon ( and maximise) other failings that could stop their actions dead in the water.

    In short I have been more than reasonable in bringing to their attention that there are issues.......If they choose to ignore them.......They are free to do so......at their peril

    Sorry that is a bit vague but obviously don't want to say too much


    I would not be sending any reply until closer to the 28 day timescale

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by Still Waving View Post
    I think it's too early for a LBA, as you have not received a solicitors letter. You could consider the SWID, but you have around 3 weeks to make a final decision about sending it. I have had several letters from Cabot since they bought one of my accounts, but not that particular one yet.

    Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View Post
    wait for a threat letter that states or indicates letter before action
    This is what makes this site so good!! Because its where experience is so valuable
    Thank you will file this and await their next letter!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    wait for a threat letter that states or indicates letter before action

    Leave a comment:


  • Still Waving
    replied
    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    SEP 2107 CABOT letter received .. your account has been reviewed for legal action. contact with 28 days so we can prevent this from happening.."
    We can help you to avoid this.


    My previous comments on this https://www.all-about-debt.co.uk/for...92#post1499692
    Niddy's original advice was on a CCA plus correspondence sent by Hallifax (UE but you must do a formal CCA in order to use it in any defence) hence the S.78 to WESTCOT.
    As reminder its been 2 years since the S.78 was sent to WESTCOT and 3 years since Halifax sent their version. But this raises the question of timing the issue of the SWID letter to CABOT. There is no direct threat at this moment

    Now the question is whether to send a LBA now rather than SWID - Possibly with a harassment letter re Phone Calls?
    I think it's too early for a LBA, as you have not received a solicitors letter. You could consider the SWID, but you have around 3 weeks to make a final decision about sending it. I have had several letters from Cabot since they bought one of my accounts, but not that particular one yet.
    Last edited by Still Waving; 23 September 2017, 22:28.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by Roger View Post
    Re: Roger UE Diary

    Intelligent Finance (Halifax)
    Type of account : Credit Card
    Date commenced : Apl 2006
    Approx balance : £2,100
    Date last paid : Feb 2012
    Are you on arrangement or not paying: Was on an arrangement
    Status (default/in arrears/up-to-date) : Default
    Account owner (who is writing to you, a DCA or the lender): was Halifax from JUL 2017 CABOT

    I used templates available elsewhere on the Internet with Halifax
    Apr 2014 Halifax sent me s.78 CCA (at their instigation) which Niddy has seen
    It's
    I have a letter dated 2014 " I can confirm when we receive your signed credit agreement, we scan it and keep a copy electronically. We then destroy the original."
    All has been quiet apart from year statements till now.
    Halifax Oct 2015 "However I have just received a letter saying they have instructed Wescot Credit Services Ltd to arrange collection of the outstanding balance"
    Wescot's letter 18 / 11/ 2015 ".. we have been instructed by our client, Halifax Credit Card.."
    AAD advised "Not to respond, see what they send next, keep Us updated"
    Wescot reminder (undated) arrived 26/11 "We wrote to you recently.." Have NOT replied.
    Wescot letter arrived Dec 2015 "our enquiries have confirmed you are resident at the address above but we have not yet had contact from you". Have NOT replied
    Wescot letter arrived Dec 2015 ""We have written to you on several occasions asking you to contact us, however to date we have not received a response. In an attempt to close this matter our client has agreed we can offer you a discount to settle this account .." ".. We have previously outlined the benefits of contacting us, however should you choose not to our client has instructed us to continue seeking recovery of the full balance".
    "..If we are unable to discuss this matter with you and agree a way forward on your account it will be returned to our client.."
    DEC 2015 Recorded Delivery s.78 Request
    to WESTCOT
    JAN 2016 2F (WESCOT)
    "Confirmation of Residency"
    JAN 2016 2F at phone won't prove ID

    MAR 2016 HALIFAX " ..we've transferred your HALIFAX debt to debt collection agency. Moorcroft.." There is an Outstanding s.78 with WESCOT
    MAR 2016 MOORCROFT ".. We have been instructed by HALIFAX.." ".. Both our client and we do not wish to take further debt recovery action but if agreement cannot be reached by 28/03/16 we may have no alternative.."
    APR 2016 MOORCROFT " Automated phone calls (2) ."

    APR 2016 MOORCROFT ".. To prevent possible further debt recovery action.." ".. If you do not contact us..we may .. recommend to our clients that they consider possible further debt recovery action against you .."
    APR 2016 MOORCROFT ".. MONTHLY INSTALMENT OFFER .."
    MAY 2016 MOORCROFT ".As no agreement has been reached we have now been asked to review your account to consider the steps which MAY be taken.."
    # "..Continue in our attempts to contact you by letter and phone"
    # "..arrange to call at your home address.."
    # "..continued adverse reporting on your credit file"

    MAY 2016 MOORCROFT "..Account passed to Home Collections Division .."
    # "..MAY involve a local rep calling.."
    # "..MAY offer a substantial discount.."
    # "..if can't afford MAY still help.."
    JUN 2016 MOORCROFT "..DISCOUNT OFFER.. Our client MAY be able to offer a substantial discount .."
    AUG 2016 HALIFAX "2016 Statement " Had these in the past will just file
    SEP 2016 HALIFAX (but posted by ROBINSON WAY) "..we have transferred your Halifax Credit Card to..Robinson Way..We've instructed Robinson Way to arrange collection of the outstanding amount.. "

    SEP 2016 ROBINSON WAY"..Your account details have been passed to us from HALIFAX... contact within next seven days.. "
    OCT 2016 ROBINSON WAY "..Contact Required. ."

    NOV 2016 ROBINSON WAY "..Help Available - Balance Reduction Offer. ."
    JUL 2017 CABOT ASSIGNMENT
    CABOT Phone Calls commence and ongoing (recorded and blocked by BT)
    AUG 2017 CABOT Letter now received (dated over week ago) . It looks and reads innocous.

    SEP 2017 CABOT Letter ".. If we do not hear from you we will continue to contact you.."
    SEP 2107 CABOT letter received .. your account has been reviewed for legal action. contact with 28 days so we can prevent this from happening.."
    We can help you to avoid this.


    My previous comments on this https://www.all-about-debt.co.uk/for...92#post1499692
    Niddy's original advice was on a CCA plus correspondence sent by Hallifax (UE but you must do a formal CCA in order to use it in any defence) hence the S.78 to WESTCOT.
    As reminder its been 2 years since the S.78 was sent to WESTCOT and 3 years since Halifax sent their version. But this raises the question of timing the issue of the SWID letter to CABOT. There is no direct threat at this moment

    Now the question is whether to send a LBA now rather than SWID - Possibly with a harassment letter re Phone Calls?
    Last edited by Roger; 23 September 2017, 21:59. Reason: Spelling

    Leave a comment:


  • Roger
    replied
    Originally posted by SaltnVinegar View Post
    It's nice that Cabot are so caring and want to keep in touch! Agree that it sounds like the usual threat-o-gram mailshot.
    Originally posted by Still Waving View Post
    I think you could let a few more letters pass before responding (dependent on content, obviously).
    Thank you S&V and Still Waving. Will take your advice
    I have a list of their phone calls time and dates.

    Others in my Diary are quiet at the moment

    Leave a comment:


  • Still Waving
    replied
    I think you could let a few more letters pass before responding (dependent on content, obviously).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X