GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Niddy vs HSBC - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Niddy vs HSBC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 5corpio
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    them into state

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Originally posted by swanfan View Post
    Haha you've even called them muppets!!
    Ooops, so I did

    Too late now, it's in the post!

    Leave a comment:


  • swanfan
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Haha you've even called them muppets!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Update 29 June 2011

    Update 29 June 2011

    Ok, mini update - still heard nothing from HSBC however I have had a letter from Metropolitan (funny buggers) - as detailed below:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Metro1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	147.2 KB
ID:	1382882

    My response, as you can imagine, doesn't pull any punches ...

    29 June 2011

    Dear Sirs,

    Ref:
    HSBC XXXXXXXX

    I write with reference to your letter dated 19 June 2011, the content of which has been noted and disregarded as the nonsense it is.

    Unfortunately for you, you’ve not only written out to an expert in consumer finance law, but you’ve also broken various Acts with the content of your letter thus a formal complaint has also been registered with the Ministry of Justice, the Financial Ombudsman and the Office of Fair Trading as I want clarity on your suitability to retain a consumer credit licence, after the misleading and unlawful threats made in your ridiculous letter.

    Not only am I extremely familiar with the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collection, but I am also clued up on s.40 MoJ. The guidance set in place to protect me as a consumer clearly states it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question, or that the debt exists. I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable and in not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive and unfair methods. Furthermore ignoring and disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical & psychological harassment.

    As for your wild and presumptuous claim that you’ll “Instruct solicitors to issue legal proceedings and apply for an attachment of earnings order” I strongly suggest you consider employing the countries best litigation expert as you’re going to need him! How dare you be so bold, rude and downright cheeky to presume such actions? Do you understand the legalities, processes and actions involved in trying to obtain an AoE order? Maybe you forget to mention that in order for such an attachment to be made you’d first have to take me to court and successfully obtain a CCJ against me, then you’d have to rely on my missing payments of said CCJ then and only then can you apply for such an order to which on the form N56, I’d request a suspension of the attachment.

    So, as you can see, it’s not quite as plain-sailing as you’d like to hope is it?

    Right, now on to the serious matter of deniability, I am formally in dispute with HSBC regards to the shambolic way I have been treated and am awaiting FOS resolution. I strongly suggest you return this account to HSBC as I am not averse to fighting you Muppets, and will take action against you if these unlawful threats continue. This account is not in arrears nor do you have any legal entitlement to chase me, stay out of things. If you want to start playing clever buggers, please be so kind as to confirm by way of response, a copy of the Notice of Absolute Assignment, particularly in line with the Law of Properties Act 1925 (s.136(1)); which I presume you’ve read and understood?

    I therefore formally give notice that no further contact be made concerning the above account as I shall simply ignore you and/or start legal proceedings against you. As previously noted, a formal complaint about your unlawful and misleading letter has been sent to the relevant authorities as mentioned.

    Yours faithfully,

    Leave a comment:


  • kilasuit
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    on the fence at both


    but swaying more so your way

    make sense?

    Leave a comment:


  • swanfan
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Although my credit file will get trashed, but then it already is with this bloody link arghhhh!!! I'll pay em back, however when I am ready - not at their demand!
    Just wait 3 years, then apply for an account with them again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Harsh what I'm doing or harsh what they done lol

    Leave a comment:


  • kilasuit
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    seems rather harsh to me but oh well.

    time to move onward and upward.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Well yea, my accounts are closed and I'm now refusing to repay £3500 that I spent when I maxed the accounts out.....

    Let's see what HSBC have to say - no reply from them yet. Oh, when I last wrote I said if they closed my accounts I'd max them out and told them they could swing for the money, ie it's fair compo for my hassles. As they closed the accounts and never replied I presume they accepted my "kind gesture".....

    I then sent a follow up saying thanks and goodbye (as you do)! Still no reply - 3 weeks later!

    Leave a comment:


  • kilasuit
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Any news on this niddy?

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Originally posted by pixie View Post
    Sounds fair compo to me.
    Me too

    Although my credit file will get trashed, but then it already is with this bloody link arghhhh!!! I'll pay em back, however when I am ready - not at their demand!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pixie
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Sounds fair compo to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    HSBC accounts all closed and gone!

    I did max them all out though so now owe HSBC £3.5k.

    They can swing for that lol... Its fair compo in my book! For my inconveniences and hassles....

    Lets see how they like (and how they fare) hassling me with debt letters etc!

    Leave a comment:


  • MustGetStraigh
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    I think that somehow, they are going to regret their decision. Go Niddy!

    Leave a comment:


  • confused76
    replied
    Re: Niddy vs HSBC

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    That they have photographic evidence I *used* to have accounts with them, ermm - yep, my passport that was lost!

    So anyway I wrote back and mentioned the fact I had 100's of letters from lenders and proof of my old addresses etc and they're calling me a liar, I will seek legal action.

    See what they say to that! Imagine it, calling me a bloody liar when I have sent them proof I never lived at this incorrect linked address, I mean - unless i'm a magician it'd be impossible to be in two places at once!
    what idiots!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X