Re: Lending Stream
That's good about your dad and the silence!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lending Stream
Collapse
X
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by SaltnVinegar View PostLong may the current situation continue! Hopefully you've been put in the 'Too difficult to deal with' pile and that'll be the end of things for a while
I hope you are well.
Still no response from the FOS.
I must still be in the "Too difficult to deal pile" as still not heard from P2P
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Hi Natty just popping in to ask about dad , hope he is well xxxx
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by Natty View PostNo update or contacts from P2P! Remember they sent me their complaint procedure and advised they will update me within 8 weeks. Still not heard a word!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by SaltnVinegar View PostNP - what I'll do over the next few days will be a little 'Mystic Meg' and suggest some options on what may happen after that point and your options. I expect that LS will end up selling your accounts to a debt collection agency and you'll start the process all over again (just not involving the FOS).
The only problem you may have is that they will use the FOS decision as a stick to beat you with, but ultimately the FOS cannot (and as you've discovered will not) rule on the legal aspects, and this will be your counter argument.
Good morning SnV,
I sent the email to the FOS yesterday.
I was thinking that the FOS decision will make LS stand firm with me more! I guess that was always going to happen.
No update or contacts from P2P! Remember they sent me their complaint procedure and advised they will update me within 8 weeks. Still not heard a word!
Mamy thanks for your continued guidance.
Natty
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by Natty View PostWill get an email sent over the weekend. Thanks SnV.
The only problem you may have is that they will use the FOS decision as a stick to beat you with, but ultimately the FOS cannot (and as you've discovered will not) rule on the legal aspects, and this will be your counter argument.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by SaltnVinegar View PostWell it has been known for an Ombudsman to overull an Adjudicator, just very unlikely. It will certainly give you another few weeks so in for a penny in for a pound...
I'd suggest emailing the adjudicator back, thanking them for their email, and stating that you'd like your case to be refered to the Ombudsman and leave it that.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by Natty View PostThe Ombudsman is not going to over rule the adjudicator. However this will give me more time letting the case be reviewed. ( what is your opinion on this)
I'd suggest emailing the adjudicator back, thanking them for their email, and stating that you'd like your case to be refered to the Ombudsman and leave it that.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Hi Natty - I'm away due to work at the moment but back tomorrow so will help you put something together for the FOS then.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by Natty View PostThanks SnV,
For bringing me back down and lessening the stress. I certainly will not bury my head and will continue with your guidance, and knowledge.
Warmest wishes
Natty
Stressing really doesn't get you anywhere except for giving you sleepless nights and a headache!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by SaltnVinegar View PostThey are rare. To give you an idea of odds:
- After recieving a formal 'Letter before Action' letter - where a creditor formally informs you that they WILL (not may), issue court proceedings
Probably 95% you'll get something that looks like a LBA. Almost always though its bluster and intended to frighten and harass, but a formal letter before action should always be responded to just to cover your back. The wording is important, and we know how to respond to these on here.
- Getting a threat of a Statutory Demand
Around 0.00000000000001%. I've never seen a debtor served with a SD for a payday loan debt. And with the changes in BR rules that are being brought in later this year raising the current £750 threshold to £5k, none of your accounts will qualify anyway.
- Receiving a Court Claim
Around 0.00001%. In 5 years on AAD we've only had ONE person receive a court claim for a PDL. They buried their head in the sand, didn't respond to letters, didn't take advice, and after they received the court claim didn't respond to our efforts to help them by not providing information, not responding to help putting together a witness statement until it was too late, and we don't even know the outcome of the court case as they never updated us.
Its a big risk for PDL companies to take someone to court, as if there is a ruling around anything such as irresponsible lending, unfair relationship provisions (e.g. extortionate interest rates), or on anything else, then it will hurt them big time and potentially even shut down their business.
For bringing me back down and lessening the stress. I certainly will not bury my head and will continue with your guidance, and knowledge.
Warmest wishes
Natty
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by Natty View PostThe rare handful situations that you mention scare the hell out of me. However I have noted the word RARE.
- After recieving a formal 'Letter before Action' letter - where a creditor formally informs you that they WILL (not may), issue court proceedings
Probably 95% you'll get something that looks like a LBA. Almost always though its bluster and intended to frighten and harass, but a formal letter before action should always be responded to just to cover your back. The wording is important, and we know how to respond to these on here.
- Getting a threat of a Statutory Demand
Around 0.00000000000001%. I've never seen a debtor served with a SD for a payday loan debt. And with the changes in BR rules that are being brought in later this year raising the current £750 threshold to £5k, none of your accounts will qualify anyway.
- Receiving a Court Claim
Around 0.00001%. In 5 years on AAD we've only had ONE person receive a court claim for a PDL. They buried their head in the sand, didn't respond to letters, didn't take advice, and after they received the court claim didn't respond to our efforts to help them by not providing information, not responding to help putting together a witness statement until it was too late, and we don't even know the outcome of the court case as they never updated us.
Its a big risk for PDL companies to take someone to court, as if there is a ruling around anything such as irresponsible lending, unfair relationship provisions (e.g. extortionate interest rates), or on anything else, then it will hurt them big time and potentially even shut down their business.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Lending Stream
Originally posted by SaltnVinegar View PostNo I'm not remotely offended
Everyone who is into their 'debt journey' learns a couple of important things:
1) Never speak to a creditor on the phone- always keep all communication in writing
2) The end goal is getting a debt to become statute barred - therefore time is your friend
3) YOU control the situation NOT the creditor
Your post didn't come across demanding, more that you'd forgotten 2 & 3 and were stressing about things and I don't want you to be stressed!
Now things with the FOS are coming to their predicted close, you have a loooong way to go now and need to preserve your energy!
There are only a rare handful of situations where you need to respond urgently:
- After recieving a formal 'Letter before Action' letter - where a creditor formally informs you that they WILL (not may), issue court proceedings
- Getting a threat of a Statutory Demand
- Receiving a Court Claim
Anything else, while it may require a response, can always wait, try to aim to allow roughly 14 days for a response to arrive at a creditors offices.
Hi SnV,
I certainly did forget those important steps! Yes I did go into stress overdrive.
I have until the 1 July to get back to the FOS, however I have to agree with you. The Ombudsman is not going to over rule the adjudicator. However this will give me more time letting the case be reviewed. ( what is your opinion on this)
The rare handful situations that you mention scare the hell out of me. However I have noted the word RARE.
Thanks again fior sticking with me.
Warmest wishes
NattyLast edited by Natty; 21 June 2015, 16:55.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: