Originally posted by swanfan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Swanfan's UE diary
Collapse
X
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Response from Moorcroft to the above, 'Cos of the age of the account our client is unable to produce a copy of your document, but please pay anyway etc etc.'
Last edited by AAD-LinkEditor; 15 January 2012, 17:32.
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Another threat of possible litigation from Moorcroft. Gonna send out this just in case--> Unenforceability Templates - Section 5Originally posted by swanfan View PostMINT
Last payment- Jul 2010
Status- 6 months in arrears
Balance- 4.6K
CCA request to Mint- 23/08/10
CCA app form to Mint- 24/09/10
Threat of doorstep visit to Resolvecall- 19/11/10
Threat to commence litigation to Triton- 26/01/11
Threat of doorstep visit to Triton- 18/03/11
Threatogram lba to Triton- 26/03/11
Threat to commence litigation to Green- 10/05/11
Threat to commence litigation to RMA- 12/07/11
Final response UE (general) to RMA- 21/07/11
Threatogram lba to Moorcroft- 9/12/11
Last edited by AAD-LinkEditor; 15 January 2012, 17:31.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
something like this maybe?Originally posted by swanfan View PostLetter from Moorcroft
Sending this plus christmas card
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
You'll probably get a "FINAL WARNING" from them first though and then bye bye!
l

regards
Garlok
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Response from Westcot, account on hold while they investigate.Originally posted by swanfan View PostLetter from Wescot re LTSB account.
Gonna send this as LTSB admitted they don't have the CCA--> Unenforceability Templates - Section 2
Bye bye westcot.
Last edited by AAD-LinkEditor; 15 January 2012, 17:39.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Hi Swanny,
I suppose this has come from the "Pre Litigation Division" at Moorcroft Towers? They have a "Division" for everything. This one actually is the "Pre School Potty Training Group" located in the basement toilets of The Towers. We had a "problem" with them and sent them a threatening letter with a counterclaim and they ran away. next we heard was from another DCA.
regards
Garlok
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Letter from Moorcroft re Mint account:-Originally posted by swanfan View PostMINT
Last payment- Jul 2010
Status- 6 months in arrears
Balance- 4.6K
CCA request to Mint- 23/08/10
CCA app form to Mint- 24/09/10
Threat of doorstep visit to Resolvecall- 19/11/10
Threat TCL to Triton- 26/01/11
Threat of doorstep visit to Tiriton- 18/03/11
Threat LBA to Triton- 26/03/11
Threat TCL to Green- 10/05/11
Threat TCL to RMA- 12/07/11
Final response UE (general) to RMA- 21/07/11

'Notice of intended litigation, to prevent this contact us immediately or a claim may be issued by our solicitors instructed to act on behalf of our client
'
Sending this plus christmas card as well
--> Unenforceability Templates - Section 5
Last edited by AAD-LinkEditor; 15 January 2012, 17:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Letter from Wescot re LTSB account.
Gonna send the piss off back to the cesspit letter as LTSB admitted they don't have the CCA--> Unenforceability Templates - Section 2Last edited by AAD-LinkEditor; 15 January 2012, 17:40.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Cheers CC - was just an off the cuff remark, you know we don't pursue slander/libel etc on hereOriginally posted by CleverClogs View PostOne might make that threat but, without the ability to back it up with a claim - even as a Litigant In Person - it remains an empty threat. I know just how expensive it can be to bring a libel case to trial. The cases brought by my celebrated (and learned) friend Dr Godfrey against Demon Internet Ltd cost him a sum in the region of £500,000 and, whilst he recovered most of that from Demon after they capitulated, he still ended up being out of pocket by a few thousands.
I have no intention whatsoever of seeking any form of borrowing in the foreseeable future, so the financial impact of those inaccurate data on me is likely to be minimal; however, they do shew that RBS seems incapable of even running a whelk stall satisfactorily.
For reference, this is the specific case (Wiki version) suitable for the layman (of the Godfrey trial):---> Godfrey v Demon Internet Service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
BBC Link ---> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/695596.stm
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Nice oneOriginally posted by swanfan View PostLetter today, 'Fairfax have put the account on hold while they seek instruction from their clients.'
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Letter today, 'Fairfax have put the account on hold while they seek instruction from their clients.'Originally posted by swanfan View PostLetter from Fairfax Sols:-
"We are sols instructed by Experto to obtain immediate payment or take appropiate recovery action. If payment is not received by 29th Oct we have authority to commence legal proceedings through the court. Please do not underestimate the seriousness of this
"
Gonna send this--> Unenforceability Templates - Section 5
Last edited by AAD-LinkEditor; 15 January 2012, 17:37.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
One might make that threat but, without the ability to back it up with a claim - even as a Litigant In Person - it remains an empty threat. I know just how expensive it can be to bring a libel case to trial. The cases brought by my celebrated (and learned) friend Dr Godfrey against Demon Internet Ltd cost him a sum in the region of £500,000 and, whilst he recovered most of that from Demon after they capitulated, he still ended up being out of pocket by a few thousands.Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View PostAre you serious? I would say a quick threat of Libel is in order, especially if you apply for some credit so others can see this incorrect data - ahem

I have no intention whatsoever of seeking any form of borrowing in the foreseeable future, so the financial impact of those inaccurate data on me is likely to be minimal; however, they do shew that RBS seems incapable of even running a whelk stall satisfactorily.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swanfan's UE diary
Letter from Fairfax Sols:-Originally posted by swanfan View PostMBNA
Last payment- Aug 2009
Status- Defaulted
Balance-12.8K
CCA request to Experto-15/02/10
CCA reminder to Experto-13/03/10
CCA sect 10 to Experto-14/04/10
CCA query to Experto-26/04/10
Harassment by Phone ToLAT to Experto- 03/09/10
TLA & RDV to CMC- 18/05/11
TBL TCL to CMC- 7/06/11
TOG LBA to CMC- 12/07/11

"We are sols instructed by Experto to obtain immediate payment or take appropiate recovery action. If payment is not received by 29th Oct we have authority to commence legal proceedings through the court. Please do not underestimate the seriousness of this
"
Gonna send this--> Unenforceability Templates - Section 5
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: