GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Hamilton - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hamilton

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Angry Cat
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Name & Registered Office:
    THE MEADS MONEY LIMITED
    CLICK HOUSE, BEAR LANE
    FARNHAM
    SURREY
    GU9 7LG
    Company No. 04547541




    Status: Active - Proposal to Strike off
    Date of Incorporation: 27/09/2002

    Country of Origin: United Kingdom
    Company Type: Private Limited Company
    Nature of Business (SIC(03)):
    6523 - Other financial intermediation
    Accounting Reference Date: 31/05
    Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/05/2009 (TOTAL EXEMPTION FULL)
    Next Accounts Due: 28/02/2011 OVERDUE
    Last Return Made Up To: 27/09/2010
    Next Return Due: 25/10/2011
    Last Members List: 27/09/2010
    Previous Names:
    Date of change Previous Name
    16/09/2003 CLICK FINANCE LIMITED
    18/10/2009 CLICK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED
    23/08/2010 CLICK PETERSFIELD LTD
    07/06/2011 CLICK MONEY LIMITED

    Leave a comment:


  • Angry Cat
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Just found this:
    HSBC plans to close Endeavour Personal Finance - New Model Adviser Edition - Citywire

    Leave a comment:


  • di30
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Thanks PF and Angry Cat.

    I totally agree, and will keep it going, thank you all for the support xx

    Leave a comment:


  • Angry Cat
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Very sorry to hear about this but not surprised.

    Keep going!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • pompeyfaith
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    I am hearing of quite a few claims that are clearly missold not going in the consumers favour, and at a time when they won the court case it is quite strange.

    If they are not going to side with the wrongdoing then why take the financial industry on in court.

    Di I think the correspondance sent to the FOS from HFC/HAMILTON and all would be quite revealing have you considered getting hold of this?

    Regards
    Last edited by pompeyfaith; 22 July 2011, 10:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • di30
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Originally posted by If... View Post
    Round two then Di and Matty.....don't let the bar stewards grind you down

    Cheers so much IF.. x

    Leave a comment:


  • di30
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Originally posted by MattyA View Post
    Bummer - as you say off to the ombudsman now!
    you have fought this long....whats another few months in the scheme of things?

    P.S. I got a knockback letter off 'em as well yesterday....so off I go too(again)

    Good luck

    Matty

    Thanks Matty

    So sorry about your knockback as well.
    They are getting tougher!

    Yet you provide them with what they ask for and it makes no difference.
    That's right, this has been a long old haul but determined all the more now, cheers hon x

    Leave a comment:


  • IF
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Round two then Di and Matty.....don't let the bar stewards grind you down

    Leave a comment:


  • MattyA
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Bummer - as you say off to the ombudsman now!
    you have fought this long....whats another few months in the scheme of things?

    P.S. I got a knockback letter off 'em as well yesterday....so off I go too(again)

    Good luck

    Matty

    Leave a comment:


  • di30
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Sorry about the 2nd part of the letter above, but here is one I just hand copied myself of that actual page.


    I therefore can only base my conclusions on the documents I have on file, of which none provide concrete evidence to suggest Click was an agent of Endeavour and ultimately that the underwriter Hamilton Insurance Company Limited would be responsible for the sale of your policy.

    Because of this, I do not believe we can consider your complaint further. I appreciate that this is likely to come as a disappointment to you. I know that this is not the outcome you were hoping for. But I hope that my explanation has been helpful in settling out clearly why I have taken this view.

    However, if you disagree with how I have reached my conclusions, please write and tell me by 5 August 2011 - setting out your reasons and including any evidence that you have not already provided and that you think is important to your case. Could you please let me know now if you plan to reply fully but do not think you will be able to meet that deadline.

    As we explain in our leaflet, your complaint and the ombudsman, consumers have the right to ask an ombudsman to review the opinion that the complaint cannot be considered further. But if we do not hear from you by 5th August 2011, we assume that you have decided not to pursue the complaint further.

    Yours sincerely


    Adjudicator.
    __________________

    Leave a comment:


  • di30
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    It arrived last minute and not good news as thought, so it will be off to the ombudsman now!

    Email received from him (and yes he is off on his hols for a fortnight now lol) good timing hey?

    Dear Mr & Mrs


    Please find opinion attached.


    Please note I will now be on annual leave till 1 August 2011 and will review any response you make on my return. A copy will be sent in tomorrows post


    Yours sincerely

    M
    Adjudicator | Financial Ombudsman Service
    South Quay Plaza | 183 Marsh Wall | London | E14 9SR T: 020E:
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • di30
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Originally posted by Susie View Post
    I would note well the word "intend" its probably a bit like DCA's putting "may" in their threat letters!! More likely to send a letter tomorrow (being Friday and desk clearing day) and forget to send you an email.
    Your so right Susie.
    Well up to now he have not emailed with his "intended" opinion lol, but as you said, it will more than likely be Friday (tomorrow) now with it being the last day of the week, and the last minute of his day lol.

    I should know him by now though, even with letters he has been the same, he says he sent out then I chase him up only to be told "what letter"? , then I resend him the email where he did say this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Susie
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Originally posted by di30 View Post
    Thank you IF..

    Well I am still waiting.

    I have read his email wrong (posted above) he does say he intends no doing this today doesn't he? (from the email received from my Adjudicator yesterday)?
    I would note well the word "intend" its probably a bit like DCA's putting "may" in their threat letters!! More likely to send a letter tomorrow (being Friday and desk clearing day) and forget to send you an email.

    Leave a comment:


  • di30
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Thank you IF..

    Well I am still waiting.

    I have read his email wrong (posted above) he does say he intends no doing this today doesn't he? (from the email received from my Adjudicator yesterday)?

    Leave a comment:


  • IF
    replied
    Re: Hamilton

    Got my fingers crossed for you Di

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X