Could they be UE?

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Could they be UE?

But the recon agreements have current address on them and NOT the address that we were at when Mrs Pooky took them out.

So, if the falsely addressed recon won't get Mrs Pooky out of it then were screwed...

well no, as a recon means they can utilise any details at their disposal. As I say, carry on blagging it, you'll be fine.....

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

You sent me agreements for these but I have already seen them above, and as they are both post 04/07 they are both enforceable..... read up this thread.

But the recon agreements have current address on them and NOT the address that we were at when Mrs Pooky took them out.

remember you're simply blagging them as they can easily provide a recon, and then an electronic tick in the box....

So, if the falsely addressed recon won't get Mrs Pooky out of it then were screwed...

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Could they be UE?

You sent me agreements for these but I have already seen them above, and as they are both post 04/07 they are both enforceable..... read up this thread.

remember you're simply blagging them as they can easily provide a recon, and then an electronic tick in the box....

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Could they be UE?

Please email me. I can't read that as too small (on phone)...

Thanks

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Just got this back from them this morning.

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Could they be UE?

(same ones I sent for my acc's - AW & JD, yes?)

---> Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | CCA Query - Missing Prescribed Terms

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Point here, they'll be enforceable as far as s.127 goes (based on it being repealed) however I would blag these and send the missing PT's - worth a go

That's what I was hoping you’d say
Cranking up the printer
(same ones I sent for my acc's - AW & JD, yes?)

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Could they be UE?

If the above accounts were opened after 04/07 then forget UE - they can create a recon and use any info available to do so. The name is de minimis as well unfortunately - easy to rectify and thus never worth fighting on unless they started action against the wrong named person....

Point here, they'll be enforceable as far as s.127 goes (based on it being repealed) however I would blag these and send the missing PT's - worth a go

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Well, Finally today, the CCA's got here.
BUT....
The address on them is out CURRENT address and NOT the one we were at when the accounts were' allegedley' opened
AND one one of them is an ALIAS that Mrs Pooky uses and NOT her real first name. And NOT signed by Mrs Pooky
Note: these were opened after that year, what was it, 2007/08/09? over the net!

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Just a quick update, still got no CCA back in the post...

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Just sit back and relax.......no need to send any letter just yet

TA, Willdo

[Deepie]

Re: Could they be UE?

Is there a template to send them saying it's by default as they have failed to comply? ... Nothing sent and it's over the prescribed 12+2...

Just sit back and relax.......no need to send any letter just yet

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Is there a template to send them saying it's by default as they have failed to comply? ... Nothing sent and it's over the prescribed 12+2...

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

There is, however, the (improbable) possibility that they did comply, at least to the extent imagined by wacky Waksman, by sending a 'reconstituted' agreement cobbled together from whatever was lying about in the office and/or hung on a nail in the staff karzi - and for their creative efforts to have been lost in the post.

It might be worthwhile chasing it a little.

Bubble Burster

[CleverClogs (RIP)]

Re: Could they be UE?

There is, however, the (improbable) possibility that they did comply, at least to the extent imagined by wacky Waksman, by sending a 'reconstituted' agreement cobbled together from whatever was lying about in the office and/or hung on a nail in the staff karzi - and for their creative efforts to have been lost in the post.

It might be worthwhile chasing it a little.