GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Could they be UE? - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Could they be UE?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Have you CCA'd them?
    Who, Simply Be & Fashion World or Reliable?

    I CCA'd SB & FW a while back and they stated that as the accounts were opened post, was it 2009 they were 'digitally signed' so they said they dont need to provide an 'physically' signed agreement therefore they say they are still .

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Originally posted by pooky2483 View Post
    Could you explain please!
    No! Lol

    Basically their agreement is unlikely to be enforceable and they're also unlikely to take action.

    That DCA (reliable) is their in-house collection. Think HSBC/Metropolitan etc

    Get the CCA's.....sorry if you already have. Just read last post and not history

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Originally posted by pooky2483 View Post
    They have been handed the accounts (Fashion World & Simply Be) to try and get the money.
    Have you CCA'd them?

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
    Sadly the name error is de minimis but anyway; they've not performed adequate checks regardless.

    This is N Brown debt (ie jd williams group) - they're rarely enforceable. Why are you communicating with them, Reliable?
    Could you explain please!

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    They have been handed the accounts (Fashion World & Simply Be) to try and get the money.

    Leave a comment:


  • Never-In-Doubt
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Sadly the name error is de minimis but anyway; they've not performed adequate checks regardless.

    This is N Brown debt (ie jd williams group) - they're rarely enforceable. Why are you communicating with them, Reliable?

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Well, I have got a reply to my last letter I sent. They are asking if Mrs Pooky is the same person who holds both accounts as one is under her real name and the other is a nickname she uses. They are asking for proof they are both her.
    We don't have any proof as such so, could she get out of one of the accounts as the other person does not really exist?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Well, they're not going to phone as they do NOT have our new phone number.
    And if they DO turn up at the door I will give them a copy of the letter I previously sent them AND a copy of the template - Our Templates | Harassment & Intimidation Templates | Harassment Follow-Up & Threat of Injunctive Relief

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Originally posted by ken100464 View Post
    They want you to panic and therefore phone them to try and stop this visit.

    Perhaps they will perhaps they wont come but would bet a large number of people would panic pick the phone up and hey presto they have phone contact again with you to try and manipulate you.

    And appointment could mean they intend to pick up the phone and ring.


    Just like the old RMA card - we will call between 8 a.m 9.p.m. signed C.Green. = telephone.

    Leave a comment:


  • ken100464
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    They want you to panic and therefore phone them to try and stop this visit.

    Perhaps they will perhaps they wont come but would bet a large number of people would panic pick the phone up and hey presto they have phone contact again with you to try and manipulate you.

    And appointment could mean they intend to pick up the phone and ring.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Tech Clerk
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    or What! the annoying tactic?

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    I have just received this letter telling they are going to do a doorstep visit TODAY - AFTER I have sent them a letter Recorded Delivery, telling not to as it was the template letter I sent. Seems they have just ignored it.
    I will be looking forward to them coming....
    They even go on to say in the letter to phone them, I have also said before that I do NOT want to be contacted by any other means than by post... are they thick or what!...
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Well, I've recently received two letters from them, one from Simple and the other from UnReliable.

    The one from Simple was dated 29 Dec 2012; 'Take notice if we do not receive your payment we intend to pass your account to a Debt Collection company, Reliable Collections Ltd within the next few days.'

    Are they STUPID... over the Christmas/New Year period they are giving me just DAYS...

    The other one from UnReliable, I just received today;'We have been instructed by our client Fashion World to consider passing your account to a nationwide doorstep debt collection company who may arrange to visit you at your address to collect the above debt'

    ...Sounds like they want a fight. Right, where’s that template...
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    Just got another 'statement' from Simple. It's dated 20th December, I received it 27th December. love the fact that it was posted over Christmas and took a week to get to me, normal post would have got to me well before now - you just gotta love their tackticks.

    They mention passing the account onto Reliable Collections at first and then further down they mention as from 3rd January, the account with Candid Collections transfers to J D Williams & Co Ltd trading as Simply Be.

    What! Who are Candid Collections? If they’re anything like Reliable Collections, what are they doing with the account in the first place and why does it say they are passing the account onto the people who own it in the first place???

    Also, they’re not giving me much notice at all about passing the account over - 3rd January. It's the Christmas period, post will not get there in time, after all, it took their letter ONE WEEK to get to me!

    I'm going to throw another CCA request at them.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • pooky2483
    replied
    Re: Could they be UE?

    They've just sent letters regarding the accounts;
    FINAL NOTICE
    I owe £287.64 & £277.57.
    They’re threatening to hand them over to a DCA (Reliable Collections)

    I cant remember as it has been rather a long time but I don’t remember DCA's immediately slapping a charge on the debt, but that’s exactly what RC do, can they do that?

    I think it's about time I hit them with another CCA request. As the accounts were opened post Apr 2009 it was by Digital Sig so theres NO 'real' signature. I have just remembered, last time I CCA'd them, they didn’t give me ANY CCA documents.

    They wrote and told me, as it was done on-line, there’s no signature and that’s it, no other documentation. Because of this, isn’t there some way I could attack them at another angle and gain more stalling time this way?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X