Could they be UE?

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

...Along with copies of the previous letters in question - I can do it with the word 'COPY' in the background in red lol

[ScabHunter]

Re: Could they be UE?

"Your conduct in this matter is unacceptable and will not be tolerated"

I remember that phrase from one of the first cases I got involved in on the Coherent Advice Gone site in 2008. Four and a half years later, and they are still singing off the same perforated hymn sheet. Maybe they haven't had a literate employee since then who could dream up some new phrases.

Yawn.

I would write a letter similar to the post you have just made, pointing out their failings in no uncertain terms.

SH

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Just had another letter from RC today;
Who the hell do these numpties think they are -
"Your conduct in this matter is unacceptable and will not be tolerated"
I could say the same about them, I have sent a CCA and got nothing back, they have threatened me with not 1 but TWO doorstep visits, after being told they have had that right removed. They say little effort has been made to pay for the goods, bo****ks, they have been getting paid for the goods since the account was opened until sometime last year, about 4 years. And now they are threatening court proceedings... for a measely £363.53...

I'm NOT paying the charges that have been piled on.

What do you think the next letter should be to them Niddy, one of your lovely 'specials'

[SA Gold]

Re: Could they be UE?

On a separate note: love this letter, and particularly this bit: "Can you get this into your thick skulls" PSML

[Deepie]

Re: Could they be UE?

It mentions about having had the doorstep visit but I haven’t, they have sent the same 'doorstep threat' letter out as last lime but they did not actually turn up. Is there anything along the lines of getting a repeated threat of a doorstep visit when I have sent them the first few templates before it, the 'only communicate by letter' and 'doorstep revocation'.

Just edit the letter.......

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

------> Harassment Follow-Up & Threat of Injunctive Relief

It mentions about having had the doorstep visit but I haven’t, they have sent the same 'doorstep threat' letter out as last lime but they did not actually turn up. Is there anything along the lines of getting a repeated threat of a doorstep visit when I have sent them the first few templates before it, the 'only communicate by letter' and 'doorstep revocation'.

[Deepie]

Re: Could they be UE?

I have just had another doorstep visit letter as per Could they be UE? - Page 3 - allaboutFORUMS
What's the next template I should send as its clear they do not listen, I know they're just idle threats but I want to send it to warn them that they cant continue to send threats like this and get away with it.

------> Harassment Follow-Up & Threat of Injunctive Relief

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

I have just had another doorstep visit letter as per Could they be UE? - Page 3 - allaboutFORUMS
What's the next template I should send as its clear they do not listen, I know they're just idle threats but I want to send it to warn them that they cant continue to send threats like this and get away with it.

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Just got this from UnReliable (crossed post as I sent the 'Missing Prescribed' on the same day they wrote this)
Note: This is the account that Mrs pooky used an alias and not her real name...
Oh and they didn’t supply a SAE as stated in the letter.

[Deepie]

Re: Could they be UE?

Can do.... Missing PT's would be the template.

Is this the one...?
Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Final Response - Unenforceability (CCA Received)

This ---------> CCA Query - Missing Prescribed Terms

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Can do.... Missing PT's would be the template.

Is this the one...?
Our Templates | Unenforceability Templates | Final Response - Unenforceability (CCA Received)

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Could they be UE?

Can do.... Missing PT's would be the template.

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Ok sorry. But they should still comply with s.78 - tick in the box copy.

I'd ignore then for now.

I'll ignore for now but I just had a thought, you say they should still comply with s.78 but they haven’t, how about if I send them a the failed to comply template?

[pooky2483]

Re: Could they be UE?

Ok sorry. But they should still comply with s.78 - tick in the box copy.

I'd ignore then for now.

OK, willdo.
They've just sent another doorstep threat letter for the FW account, they sent one about 2 weeks ago for SB. Limp threats.

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: Could they be UE?

Ok sorry. But they should still comply with s.78 - tick in the box copy.

I'd ignore then for now.