HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

[Paul.]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

If you look up HFO v Burney thats another darn good ruling

[PlanB]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

What is the significance of Bailii? Is being on there a good thing or a bad thing

[Paul.]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

Its a VERY VERY GOOD thing if you want the judgment to help others, its a BAD thing if youre a bank

[PlanB]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

. . . . because lawyers use it to look up case law before going to court I presume

I hope DJs read Bailii too

[Paul.]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

i think the whole legal profession reads it and litigants in person alike

[PlanB]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

i think the whole legal profession reads it and litigants in person alike

Although probably not good for my CV

[mystery1]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

If you look up HFO v Burney thats another darn good ruling

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/Misc/2011/23.html

M1

[Enforcer]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

Wonderful! Well done! Fair judgment.

[Meerkat Mob]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

Bit mean on the expenses though !

[vint1954]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

Bit mean on the expenses though !

Indeed, however it looks like a possible SJ.

But again, Default Notice and s78, not to mention the NOA.

You have to laugh at the claimants solicitor arguing over £17, when he has to explain to his client that he lost.

The judge would have been wrong allowing deminimis on the DN though: Amex v Barandon appeal and Harrison v Link.

[Paul.]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

HFO Capital Ltd v Roland Wegmuller [2012] EW Misc 19 (CC) (24 January 2012) And now on BAILII

[davidm]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

great result this gives us all hope.

[Never-In-Doubt]

Re: HFO Capital v Roland Wegmuller

I'll email Fribourg and ask him to pop in and say hello