Re: TTC v Very
will await to see their next letter contents, then maybe reiterate to them outstanding non response to their original investigation - then maybe at some stage a full and final at a very lower amount as charges Very are over £500+ after all this time.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TTC v Very
Collapse
X
-
Re: TTC v Very
could send copy of the e-mail to Capquest??? as they have never come back to me by Jimmy about the queries in 2014, might stop them for now or with them sometimes they just wake up bombard then quiet for a while = still no annual statement from them may be a clue?????????????????? Niddy? have you come across the situation of no annual statements and consequence for them//
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
10/10/2016 = another letter to contact capquest or they may consider court within 14 days, 2nd letter within 3 weeks stating the same but this says as I have failed to correspond_ have 14 days again.
LBA or just sit out see what next . thought to send spreadsheet again updated to Very as the charges etc are £500+ now??? any ideas
10/10/2016 = have update penalty charges spreadsheet and sent to very, . may send copy to capquest as their rep never ever got back to me in 2014 up till present time he also was investigating the non record of payments made and the issue showing credit/immediate debit of charges then immediately sold debt to capquest. just await any response next few days from very (as before sorry account not with us etc contact capquest).>>
10/10/22016 = sent e-mail with updated charges etc to CEO shop direct stating negative response in 2014 and told to contact capquest as they sold account off without crediting certain payments. will see what response may get?
14/10/2016 =I am currently away from the office on business, returning Monday 17th October. I will respond to your emails upon my rreturn.Dixon, Matt via shopdirect.onmicrosoft.com 09:59 (14 minutes ago)
to me
Thank you
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View PostNew call blocker phone on way - got refund on the last one
Silence is Golden this last week or two!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View Post27/04/2016 - Capquest Answer machine 15.26 (Bally Call blocker useless) GFo Pro Blocker = (03339997246)
29/04/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 13.30 Call blocker going back
03/05/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 15.30 = 07718107752 Capquest ring (0333999
05/05/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 14.09 = 012527655 to ring (03339997246)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View Postsent call blocker back - rubbish, will get a combined unit i.e. answer machine/blocker/phone unit
must be due a Crapquest call later to-day = every 2 days it seems
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
sent call blocker back - rubbish, will get a combined unit i.e. answer machine/blocker/phone unit
must be due a Crapquest call later to-day = every 2 days it seems
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View Post- 07718107752 Capquest
19-04-2016 - Capquest answer machine 16.00 to-day
21/04/2016 - Capquest Answer machine 17.00+
25/04/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 14.44. = 01252765512
29/04/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 13.30 Call blocker going back
03/05/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 15.30 = 07718107752 Capquest ring (03339997246)
05/05/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 14.09 = 012527655 to ring (03339997246)Last edited by The Tech Clerk; 5 May 2016, 13:25.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Michael.Lenora@vanquisban k.co.uk - Vanquis MD
Peter.Crook@providentfina ncial.com - Provident Group CEO
My reference for Vanquis
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
- 07718107752 Capquest
19-04-2016 - Capquest answer machine 16.00 to-day
21/04/2016 - Capquest Answer machine 17.00+
25/04/2016 - Capquest Answer Machine 14.44. = 01252765512Last edited by The Tech Clerk; 25 April 2016, 13:52.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View Post13/04/2016 - Capquest seems to have left message to ring them, this is regarding VERY account no doubt!
Note:-Re: TTC v Very
24/11/2014 - letter from Capquest stating that Very cannot find Default notice but state they confirm that the date of default is 14 May 2014 - NOTE:- the debt Sale date = idiots, last year is the default notice date. no mention of two payments not recorded or their charges refund NOT!
Charges up to 01/05/2016 £479.94 @ 39.70% = their balance they state £900.00 -= difference £420.25.
(very default notice dated 2nd September 2013 - not allowed for posting times = for ref )
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
13/04/2016 - Capquest seems to have left message to ring them, this is regarding VERY account no doubt!
Note:-Re: TTC v Very
24/11/2014 - letter from Capquest stating that Very cannot find Default notice but state they confirm that the date of default is 14 May 2014 - NOTE:- the debt Sale date = idiots, last year is the default notice date. no mention of two payments not recorded or their charges refund NOT!
Charges up to 01/05/2016 £479.94 @ 39.70% = their balance they state £900.00 -= difference £420.25.
(very default notice dated 2nd September 2013 - not allowed for posting times = for ref )
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
A thought - no yearly statement received from capquest since they took Very account over
no yearly statement received from Vanquis either! never received anyLast edited by The Tech Clerk; 13 April 2016, 14:36.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View PostIs the entire balance made up of errors or is there a part of the debt you do owe?
part balance which would leave about £430.00,
overall they reckoned £900.00 at start
Leave a comment:
-
Re: TTC v Very
Originally posted by The Tech Clerk View PostLook at a calendar i.e. sat/sun non business days = 4, Monday 1st April is a Bank holiday.
23/24 march is sat/sun.
25 - 29 is business days. = 5 days
30/31 is sat/sun.
01/04/2012 = Bank holiday.
02 - 05 april business days. = 4 days
06/07 april sat/sun.
08-11 april business days.= 4 days then + 1 day?
refers to vanquis for refLast edited by The Tech Clerk; 14 February 2016, 07:03.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: