Re: Help for a fool
OK, here's my take on this -
We can't possibly know for sure which is the right course of action because we don't have knowledge of all of the facts. We don't know when the last payment or written acknowledgement of the alleged debt was made, and we obviously don't know whether any agreement still exists, and, if so, whether or not it is enforceable.
What we need to do is find the course of action which involves the least amount of risk for the highest possible reward. If I was in this position, I would send the s.78 request off immediately. Here is why -
1) Lying low and waiting for the alleged debt to go statute barred no longer makes any sense if they have come after you demanding money. As of now, they have no knowledge that you are an informed consumer with knowledge of your rights, so they may try to go for a quick court judgment to secure the alleged debt. If they did, crafting a defence would prove extremely difficult as we know virtually nothing of the prevailing circumstances.
If you send an s.78 request, they will have to satisfy that before they could legitimately proceed to court. We have no knowledge of whether a compliant agreement exists, but it would be rare in an account of that age for a compliant agreement to be readily available. If such an agreement did exist, it would worsen your case, but only to the degree which would have happened in any case as the agreement would need to be produced whenever the case proceeded to court.
There is a strong chance that an agreement of this age will not be fully compliant, and the s.78 request may reveal this. If it does, your position immediately strengthens considerably.
2) If the alleged debt is statute barred, sending off a s.78 request will not alter that. In fact, sending anything would not alter it as once a debt is statute barred it cannot be un-statute barred.
3) If the alleged debt is close to being statute barred, the s.78 request may just buy enough time to close the window of opportunity the lender currently has to take action before the time elapses. In any case, the s.78 request will have no bearing on when the time actually does elapse.
For me, the risk involved in sending the request is far lower than the risk involved with not sending it. This is just my opinion, and I am only a new poster to the site, certainly not a moderator nor anyone involved with administration. Get several expert opinions before making a final choice.
SH
OK, here's my take on this -
We can't possibly know for sure which is the right course of action because we don't have knowledge of all of the facts. We don't know when the last payment or written acknowledgement of the alleged debt was made, and we obviously don't know whether any agreement still exists, and, if so, whether or not it is enforceable.
What we need to do is find the course of action which involves the least amount of risk for the highest possible reward. If I was in this position, I would send the s.78 request off immediately. Here is why -
1) Lying low and waiting for the alleged debt to go statute barred no longer makes any sense if they have come after you demanding money. As of now, they have no knowledge that you are an informed consumer with knowledge of your rights, so they may try to go for a quick court judgment to secure the alleged debt. If they did, crafting a defence would prove extremely difficult as we know virtually nothing of the prevailing circumstances.
If you send an s.78 request, they will have to satisfy that before they could legitimately proceed to court. We have no knowledge of whether a compliant agreement exists, but it would be rare in an account of that age for a compliant agreement to be readily available. If such an agreement did exist, it would worsen your case, but only to the degree which would have happened in any case as the agreement would need to be produced whenever the case proceeded to court.
There is a strong chance that an agreement of this age will not be fully compliant, and the s.78 request may reveal this. If it does, your position immediately strengthens considerably.
2) If the alleged debt is statute barred, sending off a s.78 request will not alter that. In fact, sending anything would not alter it as once a debt is statute barred it cannot be un-statute barred.
3) If the alleged debt is close to being statute barred, the s.78 request may just buy enough time to close the window of opportunity the lender currently has to take action before the time elapses. In any case, the s.78 request will have no bearing on when the time actually does elapse.
For me, the risk involved in sending the request is far lower than the risk involved with not sending it. This is just my opinion, and I am only a new poster to the site, certainly not a moderator nor anyone involved with administration. Get several expert opinions before making a final choice.
SH
Comment