GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script Threshold introduced for charging orders - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Threshold introduced for charging orders

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

    Actually it's easily 100 times that because guests can sign the petition without logging in as a member because it's posted on the open Forum just like it is here on AAD

    I've signed it twice as *me* and PlanB too
    Last edited by PlanB; 10 April 2013, 12:30. Reason: I messed up quote box :(

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

      I thought you were PlanB
      I'm an official AAD Moderator and also a volunteer, here to help make the forum run smoothly. Any views or opinions are mine and not the official line of AAD. Similarly, any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional - Find a Solicitor or go to the National Probono Centre.

      If you spot an abusive or libellous post then please report it by Clicking Here. If you need to contact me, for instance if I've issued you a warning, moved, edited or deleted your post, please send me a message by clicking my username.

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

        That was the Plan!!!!
        I'm an official AAD Moderator and also a volunteer, here to help make the forum run smoothly. Any views or opinions are mine and not the official line of AAD. Similarly, any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability. If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional - Find a Solicitor or go to the National Probono Centre.

        If you spot an abusive or libellous post then please report it by Clicking Here. If you need to contact me, for instance if I've issued you a warning, moved, edited or deleted your post, please send me a message by clicking my username.

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

          And I thought you were in2deep

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

            Not sure where you've come up with that multiple, but on that basis your forgoing 100m on MSE and 34m on CAG, which is pretty much twice the entire UK population.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

              I'm agreeing with you - the more the merrier

              It's a petition not a competition.

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                Post it wherever guys - i'm happy so long as it gets noticed and signed.

                It's also appearing in most our mods signatures.
                I'm the forum administrator and I look after the theme & features, our volunteers & users and also look after any complaints or Data Protection queries that pass through the forum or main website. I am extremely busy so if you do contact me or need a reply to a forum post then use the email or PM features offered because I do miss things and get tied up for days at a time!

                If you spot any spammers, AE's, abusive or libellous posts or anything else that just doesn't feel right then please report them to me as soon as you spot them at: webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                  I can see the reluctance to post the epetition on CAG as they hate Niddy & his Nidites lol

                  You do know the history between CAG & Niddy don’t you?
                  Also, whenever they find out that anyone on CAG is also on here, they ban them.

                  It will most lekely get deleted anyways if it is posted...
                  Last edited by pooky2483; 10 April 2013, 13:35.
                  I used to be afraid of the post... Now I look forward to it - so I can stick it to the DCA's

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                    I have edited the last 10 or so posts as you're mis-quoting. Please quote the full post or just reply.

                    Thanks
                    I'm the forum administrator and I look after the theme & features, our volunteers & users and also look after any complaints or Data Protection queries that pass through the forum or main website. I am extremely busy so if you do contact me or need a reply to a forum post then use the email or PM features offered because I do miss things and get tied up for days at a time!

                    If you spot any spammers, AE's, abusive or libellous posts or anything else that just doesn't feel right then please report them to me as soon as you spot them at: webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                      Originally posted by pooky2483 View Post
                      I can see the reluctance to post the epetition on CAG as they hate Niddy & his Nidites lol

                      You do know the history between CAG & Niddy don’t you?
                      Also, whenever they find out that anyone on CAG is also on here, they ban them.
                      That's cos they are pretty crap though. They have less than 10,000 active users, the 34,000 or whatever they claim was long before bank reclaims and the OFT test case went tits up.

                      After that, they have hardly any posters. Not surprising really.
                      I'm the forum administrator and I look after the theme & features, our volunteers & users and also look after any complaints or Data Protection queries that pass through the forum or main website. I am extremely busy so if you do contact me or need a reply to a forum post then use the email or PM features offered because I do miss things and get tied up for days at a time!

                      If you spot any spammers, AE's, abusive or libellous posts or anything else that just doesn't feel right then please report them to me as soon as you spot them at: webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                        Originally posted by planB View Post
                        It's already on Legal Beagles so that 74,000 more possible signatures

                        http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...753#post331753
                        LB only have 2147 active members....
                        I'm the forum administrator and I look after the theme & features, our volunteers & users and also look after any complaints or Data Protection queries that pass through the forum or main website. I am extremely busy so if you do contact me or need a reply to a forum post then use the email or PM features offered because I do miss things and get tied up for days at a time!

                        If you spot any spammers, AE's, abusive or libellous posts or anything else that just doesn't feel right then please report them to me as soon as you spot them at: webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                          Originally posted by Never-In-Doubt View Post
                          LB only have 2147 active members....
                          ...And a lot of them are from here lol
                          I used to be afraid of the post... Now I look forward to it - so I can stick it to the DCA's

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                            Just checked the epetition, its got 50 so far.
                            Change Charging Order Bankruptcy Thresholds - e-petitions
                            I used to be afraid of the post... Now I look forward to it - so I can stick it to the DCA's

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                              Stephen Smith

                              At least I managed to get the allaboutFORUMS.co.uk in there
                              I'm the forum administrator and I look after the theme & features, our volunteers & users and also look after any complaints or Data Protection queries that pass through the forum or main website. I am extremely busy so if you do contact me or need a reply to a forum post then use the email or PM features offered because I do miss things and get tied up for days at a time!

                              If you spot any spammers, AE's, abusive or libellous posts or anything else that just doesn't feel right then please report them to me as soon as you spot them at: webmaster@all-about-debt.co.uk

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: Threshold introduced for charging orders

                                Originally posted by pooky2483 View Post
                                I can see the reluctance to post the epetition on CAG as they hate Niddy & his Nidites lol

                                You do know the history between CAG & Niddy don’t you?
                                Also, whenever they find out that anyone on CAG is also on here, they ban them.

                                It will most lekely get deleted anyways if it is posted...
                                Hey Pooky,
                                Whats is the history between CAG and Niddy?
                                adinuff

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X