Re: Reform to bankruptcy removes court process for debtor petitions
At first instance the judge had held that Mr
Brandon's defence on this issue could not be
dismissed as "unreal". Further American Express'
argument that the 14 day period in the default
notice ran from the service of the notice as
opposed to the date of the notice could not be
accepted. Mr Brandon had much the better of the
argument on that point. Also if, as a matter of
construction, the default notice did not allow the
minimum statutory period to remedy the breach
then it was (at least) realistically arguable that the
defect could not be overlooked as de minimus.
At first instance the judge had held that Mr
Brandon's defence on this issue could not be
dismissed as "unreal". Further American Express'
argument that the 14 day period in the default
notice ran from the service of the notice as
opposed to the date of the notice could not be
accepted. Mr Brandon had much the better of the
argument on that point. Also if, as a matter of
construction, the default notice did not allow the
minimum statutory period to remedy the breach
then it was (at least) realistically arguable that the
defect could not be overlooked as de minimus.
Comment