Re: UE Diary of Susieblings Daughter
Thanks Pixie... what "bothered me a bit was this, that the Lloyds person put in their letter.
Regulation 3 (2)(B) provides that a copy can omit any signature box , signature or date of signature. In summary we are not required to produce a copy with the primary cardholders signature on it.
I don t understand that bit, The agreement page that Niddy states, sort of looked like something was missing... and surely there should be something to indicate she signed and agreed to the terms albeit in the future , being as she took the thing out in 1998 there abouts? Being as I argued over something that hinged on my signature, surely its an important part?
I think this was what was throwing me, that they could issue something dated 2011 with no signature to agree it. like she only just took it out.
Sorry , I just need to understand, and I am doing my homework reading the stickies, ( several times to get them to sink in )
Thanks Pixie... what "bothered me a bit was this, that the Lloyds person put in their letter.
Regulation 3 (2)(B) provides that a copy can omit any signature box , signature or date of signature. In summary we are not required to produce a copy with the primary cardholders signature on it.
I don t understand that bit, The agreement page that Niddy states, sort of looked like something was missing... and surely there should be something to indicate she signed and agreed to the terms albeit in the future , being as she took the thing out in 1998 there abouts? Being as I argued over something that hinged on my signature, surely its an important part?
I think this was what was throwing me, that they could issue something dated 2011 with no signature to agree it. like she only just took it out.
Sorry , I just need to understand, and I am doing my homework reading the stickies, ( several times to get them to sink in )
Comment