Re: Walsh1's UE Diary
I would personally send it next time Lowells write to me, as by then it will have gone beyond 7th September and any minor arguments about the statute barring date should be irrelevant.
If they want to argue at that point, they would need to find “evidence” of a written acknowledgement or a payment which does not appear on the original statement. It is not impossible that they would try to fake something, but they could also just admit SB and let this one go. They did that in a similar case recently (scarednshakin).
SH
I would personally send it next time Lowells write to me, as by then it will have gone beyond 7th September and any minor arguments about the statute barring date should be irrelevant.
If they want to argue at that point, they would need to find “evidence” of a written acknowledgement or a payment which does not appear on the original statement. It is not impossible that they would try to fake something, but they could also just admit SB and let this one go. They did that in a similar case recently (scarednshakin).
SH
Comment