Re: lorings UE Diary
Hi Niddy
Thanks Niddy I will get copies of that letter off and see what happens.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
lorings UE Diary
Collapse
X
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Originally posted by loring View PostHi Niddy
The drop off date for the original drop off date was 14/08/2011, that is well past. I submitted a complaint to the ICO on 6th October 2011. I also spoke to Equifax and they have said that it the creditor who puts the information on the credit file and only the creditor can remove it. I also sent Equifax a copy of my complaint to the ICO.
send this to the CRA's - they'll then sort it for you: ---> http://forums.all-about-debt.co.uk/s...53&postcount=5
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Hi Niddy
The drop off date for the original drop off date was 14/08/2011, that is well past. I submitted a complaint to the ICO on 6th October 2011. I also spoke to Equifax and they have said that it the creditor who puts the information on the credit file and only the creditor can remove it. I also sent Equifax a copy of my complaint to the ICO.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Originally posted by oldyboy View PostI hope the ICO gives them a good Spanking!!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Yes that is a dodgy practice as Garlok has said. I'll remember that tactic.
I hope the ICO gives them a good Spanking!!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Hiya
This is a simple breach of s.87 and easy to rectify, you can send a letter to the CRA's demanding removal of the duplicate entry or you can contact them that added the default again.
I'd wait until after the automatic drop-off date before raising any queries though, just to be safe...... it's not the end of the world right now, and easy to fix.... Just send a copy of the old report that shows the old default date then attacha copy of the new report - they cannot add duplicate defaults for the same dabt. One default per lifecycle of debt
Niddy :niddy
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Hi
The account was originally defaulted in 2005 and registered with the credit reference agencies, RBS/Mint cancelled the account from my credit file in March 2011 but on the very same day they re registered it as a new account with no default nor was it marked as a "delinquent" account. Then in May 2011 they issued me a new default notice and in July 2011 they marked the account as "delinquent". The matter has been reported to the ICO but they are so busy they have not been able to look at my complaint yet.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
If you check your credit file take a look at the original default date. If that is still marked as 2005 then I don't think you really have a problem, as it should still fall off on time.
If they've updated that, however, then I suggest you get on to the ICO as BBoo has posted.
One of my creditors has continuously marked my CF with defaulted/ delinquent payments every month since defaulting me a few years ago. The original date has stayed the same.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
I don't think they can do that. Its very dodgy practice indeed.
Garlok
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Delinquent is marked when payments are repeatedly missed for an extended period of time.
Their argument sounds pretty flawed on the face of it. My understanding is that whatever the purpose, an account cannot be defaulted twice. I'd report them to the ICO.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
RBS/ Mint visa card account.
I have received a letter from MINT which admits they should not have used monies to credit the account which were sent for the supply of copy documents.
The letter also states the original default issued in 2005 was not served on the account properly so they removed it in March 2011 and issued a new default notice in July 2011 to run for another 6 years. They have said the default is for in house purposes and is not shown on my credit file but I have seen they have marked the account as "delinquent" in July 2011. Is this not the same as saying it is in default. I have sent a copy of the letter to Niddy for his opinion on its content.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Capital One / carter letter.
I have sent a letter to carter which is basically a copy of a Niddy template with a few things added. He has not responded yet but I am sure he will keep trying.
loring
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Hi evenless...
No Fredrickson last wrote to me in June 2011 to say the account was being placed on hold for 28 days. That was after I sent them a letter suggested by Niddy. Prior to that Capquest and HL Collections were doing the chasing and they gave up after about 18 months..
Anything I have read about Carter is negative and he uses underhand methods, so I want to stop Carter in his tracks from day one. I have no wish to send him nice polite letters and I was looking for help in locating the basis of a stern abrupt letter.
thanks
loring
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Hi Loring
is this the first contact from Fred's? (Cap One Visa)
Leave a comment:
-
Re: lorings UE Diary
Mint Visa Card
Hi BBoo
When I said written to the ICO, I meant I had issued a complaint and supplied the back up documentation. I sent Mint a copy of the complaint without attachments. Over the next couple of days I will look out addresses for the credit reference agencies and copy the ICO complaint to them and request they should remove the default.
loring
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: