Re: Which Way to Go?
Third update - similar to the other account in my previous post above.
Update:
Nov 2016 - - Late reply from Arrow to CCA74 request. In the heading they include "ASSIGNED BY Idem ..." (notwithstanding their NoA said they had purchased the account). They go on to say that they don't accept they are the creditor as envisaged by CCA74, however they will assist in obtaining the agreement, and confirm all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents. They returned my postal order. - Filed until they make contact again.
Dec 2016 - Arrow letter - They still await copy documentation from originating creditor. - Filed.
Jan 2017 - Shoosmiths letter - Enclosing copy of the Default Notice. They say statements not available and they await copy of the Agreement and NoA. - Filed.
Mar 2017 - Arrow letter - They still await copy documentation from originating creditor. - Filed.
Third update - similar to the other account in my previous post above.
Originally posted by Still Waving
View Post
Nov 2016 - - Late reply from Arrow to CCA74 request. In the heading they include "ASSIGNED BY Idem ..." (notwithstanding their NoA said they had purchased the account). They go on to say that they don't accept they are the creditor as envisaged by CCA74, however they will assist in obtaining the agreement, and confirm all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents. They returned my postal order. - Filed until they make contact again.
Dec 2016 - Arrow letter - They still await copy documentation from originating creditor. - Filed.
Jan 2017 - Shoosmiths letter - Enclosing copy of the Default Notice. They say statements not available and they await copy of the Agreement and NoA. - Filed.
Mar 2017 - Arrow letter - They still await copy documentation from originating creditor. - Filed.
Comment