Re: Heading the Right Way!
Thanks Niddy,
I think a dissection at this stage is perhaps premature. It is a subject I spent a lot of time on prior to even mentioning the matter to our solicitors as I was so unsure.
We have won significantly with their help and control hence I would and always have advised that it is not for the faint hearted and a good litigation lawyer is really needed. Which is definitely not expensive if significant sums are involved.
I reiterate : Lloyd LJ made the distinction between F & F s dealt with by lawyers and those dealt with directly between debtor/creditor. ( Stour Valley Builders) in the Court of Appeal.
In the same case he also said in his judgment (or words to this effect):
"It matters not what the creditor intends but by by his words and actions what he has led the debtor to believe"
That quote in a judgement in the Court of Appeal and in a case which went eventually against the debtor to boot. He made much of the time frames/limitations as well.
There is also a later case "Cantor Index" which removes much ambiguity which puts more emphasis on " Conduct". "Fry" I believe as you know fell for other reasons as well.
This is not the place to debate such issues and I keep saying that this is DECEPTIVELY simple. It is NOT.
regards
Garlok
Thanks Niddy,
I think a dissection at this stage is perhaps premature. It is a subject I spent a lot of time on prior to even mentioning the matter to our solicitors as I was so unsure.
We have won significantly with their help and control hence I would and always have advised that it is not for the faint hearted and a good litigation lawyer is really needed. Which is definitely not expensive if significant sums are involved.
I reiterate : Lloyd LJ made the distinction between F & F s dealt with by lawyers and those dealt with directly between debtor/creditor. ( Stour Valley Builders) in the Court of Appeal.
In the same case he also said in his judgment (or words to this effect):
"It matters not what the creditor intends but by by his words and actions what he has led the debtor to believe"
That quote in a judgement in the Court of Appeal and in a case which went eventually against the debtor to boot. He made much of the time frames/limitations as well.
There is also a later case "Cantor Index" which removes much ambiguity which puts more emphasis on " Conduct". "Fry" I believe as you know fell for other reasons as well.
This is not the place to debate such issues and I keep saying that this is DECEPTIVELY simple. It is NOT.
regards
Garlok
Comment