Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

[cappo]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

Still waiting for his email to come through.
I know exactly what you mean here, am wondering if you did have the same one as me (Matt)???
My son would do a far better job and he has needs bless him x

you probably had mine as well lol bless her,they really don't seem to have the time to properly investigate a complaint now.

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

I did end up receive the opinion from the Adjudicator last going off, but my vibes were right all along, so it will be going to the ombudsman, who will hopefully have more experience of issues like ours, the Adjudicator just does not get it, sorry to say but this one is so incompetent.

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

As thought.........no email with his decision yet, and I think they finish the day at 5pm

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

Nope mine was Peter, I'm sure he really is a nice chap, but I feel he comes from the never a lender or borrow be camp.

His letters where actually more one sided than the earlier ones I recieved from the bank!!!!

When speaking to ours on the phone, he is nice enough to talk to but it's trying to explain was the problem, he would turn it all back round to the beginning again as such, so it's like starting all over again, it will be 3 years this year.
One sided yes I can recall on that.

[mgfboy]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

Nope mine was Peter, I'm sure he really is a nice chap, but I feel he comes from the never a lender or borrow be camp.

His letters where actually more one sided than the earlier ones I recieved from the bank!!!!

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

If you ajudicator was anything like mine, I wouldn't hold out much hope. Once he had made a decision on the case , he keep on changing his argument to justify his position. Even to the extent of ignoring evidensed legal positions because he didn't like them. I also think he really didn't understand anything to do with consumer law and the banking code!!!

Still waiting for his email to come through.
I know exactly what you mean here, am wondering if you did have the same one as me (Matt)???
My son would do a far better job and he has needs bless him x

[mgfboy]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

If you ajudicator was anything like mine, I wouldn't hold out much hope. Once he had made a decision on the case , he keep on changing his argument to justify his position. Even to the extent of ignoring evidensed legal positions because he didn't like them. I also think he really didn't understand anything to do with consumer law and the banking code!!!

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

Well tomorrow I should be receiving some feedback from my Adjudicator on his opinion of our case, (Hamilton), hope he understands our case by now, but if not it's off to the ombudsman.

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

Same with mine Di,they rarely seem to consider the complainant now, it's certainly going to make the ombudsmans job harder,it's like what i said about capital one the sheer volume of complaints that the fos are getting now about capital one and they reject them nearly every time,we can't all be wrong can we.

That is right Cappo.
And another thing is as well, if the case have been in with the FOS for far too long and they reject - we are out of time to go the court direction, maddening!

[cappo]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

I agree Cappo.
I understand they must do their job in taking into account both sides, but in my opinion I don't think that's the case.
Where we've had to provide concrete evidence, they take the banks etc word for it verbally, well in my case anyway.

Same with mine Di,they rarely seem to consider the complainant now, it's certainly going to make the ombudsmans job harder,it's like what i said about capital one the sheer volume of complaints that the fos are getting now about capital one and they reject them nearly every time,we can't all be wrong can we.

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

I don't think they'll disagree with there own,it all looks a bit fishy,does that sound paranoid guys?

I agree Cappo.
I understand they must do their job in taking into account both sides, but in my opinion I don't think that's the case.
Where we've had to provide concrete evidence, they take the banks etc word for it verbally, well in my case anyway.

[cappo]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

Wasn't they disbanded last year as well?

So basically the Adjudicator has a line Manager where they are an option instead of the SRT perhaps?

Cheers x

I don't think they'll disagree with there own,it all looks a bit fishy,does that sound paranoid guys?

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

Wasn't they disbanded last year as well?

So basically the Adjudicator has a line Manager where they are an option instead of the SRT perhaps?

Cheers x

[di30]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

No the SRT is a dept within the FOS (next floor up i believe) that deals with complaints about the FOS.

I sent them a letter when the adjudicator kept phoning me when I had made it clear that only letters will do due to my inability to absorb phone calls quick enough.

That one letter to the SRT did the trick.

Regards

Thank you PF, that is good to know, much appreciated x

[pompeyfaith]

Re: Am I being Harsh on the FOS?

No the SRT is a dept within the FOS (next floor up i believe) that deals with complaints about the FOS.

I sent them a letter when the adjudicator kept phoning me when I had made it clear that only letters will do due to my inability to absorb phone calls quick enough.

That one letter to the SRT did the trick.

Regards