Tweet
Re: Pepe2008 Heading for the Sun!
Had a nice yellow and red letter from C.A.R.S today about the Monument Account with a Mailer Reply Card as a 'CCA'. Jokers.
This was their 3rd letter, I have ignored them so far, but today I am feeling playful...... so...
Your letter dated 18th October 2012.
Don’t send me such threatening crap. You are ( or should be ) aware that this matter has been through more Debt Collectors than a dose of Salmonella at the Debt Collectors Ball and now it seems to have hit the blockage in the U-bend that is you.
To this date NOBODY has provided me with a correctly worded, properly executed Agreement that fully Complies with all the relevant Sections of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. That is all I have been asking for…. Nothing more, nothing less…. And I ask for it as I don’t believe that there is such a Document and that all those involved up to this date have striven to hide this fact and attempted to use their size, resources and ( so they think ) apparently superior knowledge to harass and threaten me into giving them money.
Don’t go quoting McGuffey and Carey at me because you know (?) that that just talks about illegible copies and reconstructing a Document from such ( or thin air ) which may in itself satisfy a Section 77-79 Request but it does NOT affect the fact that what is being supplied is , in fact, not enforceable under Law when the ORIGINAL is required to show that the Agreement was AT THE TIME OF MAKING correctly worded, constructed and executed entirely within the bounds of what is required under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Also, don’t start with the Amendments of that Act, nothing has changed .
So, until you have got an Agreement along the above lines ( not just a Reply Card from a Mailshot either ) , do not contact me. I also remind you that when you have confirmed that such a Document is NOT available you are obliged to tell me such and confirm that the matter has been closed.
Just a side-note to save you sending a ‘doorstep collector’. I rent my doorstep, it is not accessible from Public Property, you would need an Easement and/or a Wayleave to do so. Any ‘visitors’ would be immediately reported for Trespass.
Until then, I quote Pressdram V Arkell, Court of Appeal, 1971.
......
Had a nice yellow and red letter from C.A.R.S today about the Monument Account with a Mailer Reply Card as a 'CCA'. Jokers.
This was their 3rd letter, I have ignored them so far, but today I am feeling playful...... so...
Your letter dated 18th October 2012.
Don’t send me such threatening crap. You are ( or should be ) aware that this matter has been through more Debt Collectors than a dose of Salmonella at the Debt Collectors Ball and now it seems to have hit the blockage in the U-bend that is you.
To this date NOBODY has provided me with a correctly worded, properly executed Agreement that fully Complies with all the relevant Sections of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. That is all I have been asking for…. Nothing more, nothing less…. And I ask for it as I don’t believe that there is such a Document and that all those involved up to this date have striven to hide this fact and attempted to use their size, resources and ( so they think ) apparently superior knowledge to harass and threaten me into giving them money.
Don’t go quoting McGuffey and Carey at me because you know (?) that that just talks about illegible copies and reconstructing a Document from such ( or thin air ) which may in itself satisfy a Section 77-79 Request but it does NOT affect the fact that what is being supplied is , in fact, not enforceable under Law when the ORIGINAL is required to show that the Agreement was AT THE TIME OF MAKING correctly worded, constructed and executed entirely within the bounds of what is required under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Also, don’t start with the Amendments of that Act, nothing has changed .
So, until you have got an Agreement along the above lines ( not just a Reply Card from a Mailshot either ) , do not contact me. I also remind you that when you have confirmed that such a Document is NOT available you are obliged to tell me such and confirm that the matter has been closed.
Just a side-note to save you sending a ‘doorstep collector’. I rent my doorstep, it is not accessible from Public Property, you would need an Easement and/or a Wayleave to do so. Any ‘visitors’ would be immediately reported for Trespass.
Until then, I quote Pressdram V Arkell, Court of Appeal, 1971.
......
)
Comment