Re: lorings UE Diary
See here for relevant SAR chase-up letter: Creditor Refusal of SAR
ICO complaint is also necessary, not because they will do anything, but it'll help any possible legal action you may need to take.
Whilist I appreciate the advice above is sound, what you need to remember is the ICO do not have the same powers as a regulator and thus anything they request, that is not adhered to goes unpunished which is why it's a joke.
You can go to the ico and if they find in your favour and the bank piss-about then you'll be able to take action against the bank for the faults, based on that outcome and the history of facts. That said, it's not something we suggest here - ie we NEVER suggest taking action against a lender - it is just too risky.
If the lender takes action against you, so be it - we fight them. We do not start the fight and ergo, I never mentioned half of the above because in your case it simply is not worth it.
So I suggest, as I did previously, resend the SAR using the added template above and inform the ICO and then leave it at that until you get a response from the ICO.
If the ICO do not find in your favour and/or they back up the bank then complain to the FOS.
No need to learn the legislation, put simply they have failed to adequately respond to your s.7 request for personal data. That in itself means all the ICO will do is tell them to expedite the process and deal with you.
I hate the ICO and the body they purport to be.
See here for relevant SAR chase-up letter: Creditor Refusal of SAR
ICO complaint is also necessary, not because they will do anything, but it'll help any possible legal action you may need to take.
Whilist I appreciate the advice above is sound, what you need to remember is the ICO do not have the same powers as a regulator and thus anything they request, that is not adhered to goes unpunished which is why it's a joke.
You can go to the ico and if they find in your favour and the bank piss-about then you'll be able to take action against the bank for the faults, based on that outcome and the history of facts. That said, it's not something we suggest here - ie we NEVER suggest taking action against a lender - it is just too risky.
If the lender takes action against you, so be it - we fight them. We do not start the fight and ergo, I never mentioned half of the above because in your case it simply is not worth it.
So I suggest, as I did previously, resend the SAR using the added template above and inform the ICO and then leave it at that until you get a response from the ICO.
If the ICO do not find in your favour and/or they back up the bank then complain to the FOS.
No need to learn the legislation, put simply they have failed to adequately respond to your s.7 request for personal data. That in itself means all the ICO will do is tell them to expedite the process and deal with you.
I hate the ICO and the body they purport to be.
Comment