Re: Ten years of Black Horse, help me to end it please ?
Oh FFS!! They're really p*ssing me off now.... Send the letter below to Aplins by rec. delivery....
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your Ref:
With reference to your letter of xx/xx/xx threatening legal action on behalf of your client, please note that I do not acknowledge any debt to your client and suggest that you refer the matter back to them before proceeding any further with this farce.
Your client has already stated, in writing, that they "cannot comment on actions taken prior to acquisition" in response to two direct requests under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPUTR) 2008 for clarification of figures sold to them by Black Horse Finance Limited some time ago. This means that your client; Hillesden Securities, are unable to substantiate any figures that they have "instructed" you to chase because Black Horse Finance themselves have been unable to substantiate any for years, before selling an alleged balance to your client.
I have already pointed out to your client and their agents that this account was clearly disputed before it fell into their hands, is both an unlawful and invalid assignment and that I have no desire to keep on repeating myself, yet here we go again. Only this time, your client seems to have resorted to intimidation tactics through a firm of solicitors instead of through a different set of agents.
Please note therefore, that if you decide to pursue me through the county court for a dubious and unsubstantiated payment on behalf of your clients, regardless of your client's written assertion under CPUTR (2008) that they "cannot comment on actions taken prior to acquisition", then this will be brought before the court as a deliberate and further attempt to mislead and as such, your company will be be held complicit in its actions.
I therefore suggest that you return your "instructions" and start thinking independently before further complaints are lodged with the Office of Fair Trading in relation to CPUTR (2008), as well as the Solicitors' Regulatory Authority.
I await your considered response.
Yours faithfully,
Oh FFS!! They're really p*ssing me off now.... Send the letter below to Aplins by rec. delivery....
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your Ref:
With reference to your letter of xx/xx/xx threatening legal action on behalf of your client, please note that I do not acknowledge any debt to your client and suggest that you refer the matter back to them before proceeding any further with this farce.
Your client has already stated, in writing, that they "cannot comment on actions taken prior to acquisition" in response to two direct requests under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPUTR) 2008 for clarification of figures sold to them by Black Horse Finance Limited some time ago. This means that your client; Hillesden Securities, are unable to substantiate any figures that they have "instructed" you to chase because Black Horse Finance themselves have been unable to substantiate any for years, before selling an alleged balance to your client.
I have already pointed out to your client and their agents that this account was clearly disputed before it fell into their hands, is both an unlawful and invalid assignment and that I have no desire to keep on repeating myself, yet here we go again. Only this time, your client seems to have resorted to intimidation tactics through a firm of solicitors instead of through a different set of agents.
Please note therefore, that if you decide to pursue me through the county court for a dubious and unsubstantiated payment on behalf of your clients, regardless of your client's written assertion under CPUTR (2008) that they "cannot comment on actions taken prior to acquisition", then this will be brought before the court as a deliberate and further attempt to mislead and as such, your company will be be held complicit in its actions.
I therefore suggest that you return your "instructions" and start thinking independently before further complaints are lodged with the Office of Fair Trading in relation to CPUTR (2008), as well as the Solicitors' Regulatory Authority.
I await your considered response.
Yours faithfully,
Comment