GDPR Cookie Consent by SimpleServe Privacy Script CPUTR 2008 chat thread... - AAD Consumer Forum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CPUTR 2008 chat thread...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    Originally posted by PriorityOne View Post
    Oh well.... there you go.

    If they can't find any info. on CAG, then they'll come here for it..... so CAG may have shot themselves in the foot with that one.

    The funny thing is, I never did have a clone account and never sent a link via CAG directing anyone here. They've just assumed so. People have been directed here via other means outside of CAG.

    Threads can be built up again, if need be. Many people who contributed to that thread now know about AAD anyway..... but the UE system on here is so tight, that it's not needed as much as it was on CAG; it's just an extra weapon in the armoury.

    Happy days.....
    Indeed, I don't know what has happened over there. There seems to be no fight left, although there are 2 or 3 still battling on.

    Not sure what has frightened them, or who.

    Vint

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    Originally posted by Flowerpower

    May have been because last week there were some new posts on it wondering where you had gone and people saying they wanted to PM you but 'the facility had been removed'. They could have just removed those posts if they wanted to but it looks like, as long as the thread was there, people would keep wondering, posting and asking.


    It looks like they are following the old Soviet style where the believe if they manage to hide the fact that there are alternatives to their system, the people will happily put up with it and even defend it and admire it (out of ignorance), however, should anyone find out there is an alternative out there, there would be a massive exodus and the system would collapse.

    This site is clearly as much of a threat to those guys as The West was to the Soviet system - and we know what happened to the old Soviet Union, don't we?


    ...and that was 20 years ago, in the dark ages, without internet or phantom spammers!

    For the consumer, the future is bright, the future is Orange

    Leave a comment:


  • vint1954
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    Originally posted by PriorityOne View Post
    My CPUTR thread appears to have been removed from CAG....

    OMG!!! How fecking stoopid can you get?!!

    Hi P1,

    No, it is still there as a sticky.

    Vint

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: PriorityOne & CPUTR 2008

    Are there phantom spammers on Cag...well who would believe that anyone would do that

    Leave a comment:


  • PriorityOne
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    Oh well.... there you go.

    If they can't find any info. on CAG, then they'll come here for it..... so CAG may have shot themselves in the foot with that one.

    The funny thing is, I never did have a clone account and never sent a link via CAG directing anyone here. They've just assumed so. People have been directed here via other means outside of CAG.

    Threads can be built up again, if need be. Many people who contributed to that thread now know about AAD anyway..... but the UE system on here is so tight, that it's not needed as much as it was on CAG; it's just an extra weapon in the armoury.

    Happy days.....
    Last edited by PriorityOne; 20 May 2012, 10:54.

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    Just because they are paranoid doesn't mean we aren't all out to get them! It seems to me that a lot of threads are being removed. Anything that might give the consumer the upper hand. I wonder if bank fodders mortgage has gone up?

    Leave a comment:


  • PriorityOne
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    My CPUTR thread appears to have been removed from CAG....

    OMG!!! How fecking stoopid can you get?!!

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    I am glad you would never comment BBoo as I do have a reputation to uphold and being kissed by random men doesn't fit with it. However just so yo uknow, it was a manly continental style kiss.

    Leave a comment:


  • BBoo
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    I would. Never dream of commenting on Niddy kissing Jon on open forum, so I sincerely hope others don't either. Backs to the wall boys!

    Only joking Niddy, just remembered what you did to my profile last time.lol
    Last edited by BBoo; 13 May 2012, 06:24. Reason: Try to dig my way out of a hole. Pmsl

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    So do I

    Leave a comment:


  • nightwatch
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    the t word TONKA??
    you will find i laugh at most things
    I have a sick sense of humor

    Leave a comment:


  • jon1965
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    What are you laughing at Mutley?

    Leave a comment:


  • nightwatch
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    Originally posted by jon1965 View Post
    Yes Niddy has checked it out and says enforcable. Cap1 says it is a scanned copy of my original agreement and has my signature on it.

    The T word is what Niddy called me yesterday in my ESA thread T**T lol

    I have sent a missing prescribed terms though

    Leave a comment:


  • PriorityOne
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    Originally posted by thechippy View Post
    "Andy" seems to be quite helpful to those in the legal section.

    Out of curiosity, would you say his advice is generally good?
    From what I know of Andy, he is a good sort.... yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • thechippy
    replied
    Re: CPUTR 2008 Thread

    "Andy" seems to be quite helpful to those in the legal section.

    Out of curiosity, would you say his advice is generally good?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X